• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Optimal number of HDs to winrar?

shira

Diamond Member
I'm building a new system, which I plan to use in part on newsgroups.

So I'll be winraring large amounts of data. I've been told that a single HD can get kind of bogged down. So I'm wondering whether it's optimal to have two HDs, a "source" and a "destination" for winraring. Or is there some reason I should use THREE HDs?

I'm going to be using Hitachi SATA-300 NCQ HDs. Will the NCQ feature help in any way?

Thanks.
 
I didn't know hard drive performance was a limiting factor for winrar performance. I thought that was mainly cpu based. Maybe I'm wrong.
 
Originally posted by: V00D00
I didn't know hard drive performance was a limiting factor for winrar performance. I thought that was mainly cpu based. Maybe I'm wrong.

CPU performance is definitely a factor. But my understanding is that the constant reads and writes that occur during winraring can bring a single HD to its knees.

Or maybe it's the added burden that would occur if a big download were occurring at the same time as winraring.

Or maybe I've been misinformed. Hence this thread.
 
Two drives is enough, one for the source files, one for the target files. It speeds up large file copies a lot compared to a single drive. The drive head seeks is what slows down a single drive.
 
Back
Top