I realized that my opteron 185 with 2GB RAM and Radeon X1950, while certainly not a top performance PC, should give me OK FPS, certainly in the Source engine, if not in Crysis obviously.
My setup isn't OC'ed although I watercool my CPU.
Anyway, so I ran SANDRA and here is what I discovered:
Processor Arithmetic: Exactly where I should be, a couple points above the FX-60
Processor Multi-Media: Exactly where I should be, a couple points above the FX-60
Memory Bandwidth: Holy hell... About 1/3 rd of what I should get... 1890 instead of 5300 / 5400 mb/s
Memory Latency: Hmmm... Up to 256kb data size, I am on par with what I should get. Then at 1mb I am much faster than reference (34 clocks vs about 125 ref), Which makes sense, since the CPU has 1mB of L2 cache per core. Then at 4Mb I am screwed. Getting a latency of about 500 clocks on CPU1 and 620 on CPU2 compared to my reference of 140 clocks. And it stays there at 16Mb data size and 64Mb data size.
Cache and memory bench: A little bit above reference in terms of performance.
So, any idea how to tell if it's the RAM or the chipset?
Thanks!!
My setup isn't OC'ed although I watercool my CPU.
Anyway, so I ran SANDRA and here is what I discovered:
Processor Arithmetic: Exactly where I should be, a couple points above the FX-60
Processor Multi-Media: Exactly where I should be, a couple points above the FX-60
Memory Bandwidth: Holy hell... About 1/3 rd of what I should get... 1890 instead of 5300 / 5400 mb/s
Memory Latency: Hmmm... Up to 256kb data size, I am on par with what I should get. Then at 1mb I am much faster than reference (34 clocks vs about 125 ref), Which makes sense, since the CPU has 1mB of L2 cache per core. Then at 4Mb I am screwed. Getting a latency of about 500 clocks on CPU1 and 620 on CPU2 compared to my reference of 140 clocks. And it stays there at 16Mb data size and 64Mb data size.
Cache and memory bench: A little bit above reference in terms of performance.
So, any idea how to tell if it's the RAM or the chipset?
Thanks!!