Originally posted by: dullard
A friend complains about personal income and payroll taxes. He owns his own small business. He needs to form an LLC for other reasons, but thinks he might as well form the LLC off-shore to avoid any corporate taxes (several countries will do this with no taxes). All profits would be shown in the other country, and thus the LLC wound have no taxes.
Then, instead of paying himself a salary, he would borrow money from the company with a 0% interest loan. He'd never have personal income, and thus never pay taxes.
I see many likely problems with that situation, but I can't persuade him. So, can ATOT come up with a big list of reasons why that could come back and haunt him?
I'm a tax CPA with international experience. I worked in PriceWaterHouseCoopers European HQ in Paris and in the US/World HQ in NYC etc.
There is a lot of mis-information in this thread. This topic, like many in tax, in quite complicated.
The primary reason not to do this is it is prima facia criminal tax evasion. His likely sentance will be 7 - 8 years in Federal prison. These types of abusive "offshore" scemes have the IRS (and the DoJ as they prosecute, not the IRS) attention and receive top priority. They are constently looking for it.
Even if he sets up an offshore company tax will be due here for two reasons (1) he is a US citizen therefore income from any source (domestic or foreign) must be reported (that has been upheld by the Supreme Court); (2) it sounds like you are performing the work here, as such it is US source income and the tax would be due here, not in the foreign location.
There are two theories or approaches employed world-wide in taxation. One is that the income which arises from activity within a countries borders are taxable by that country. The other is that persons (e.g., companies & individuals) from that country must pay tax to their country on their world-wide income. The USA is the only country that employs both approaches (although I understand that Australia is very close).
I can tell you with a great deal of certainty his sceme will not go unnoticed for very long. There are too many banking requirements and disclosures required, particularly after 9/11.
In short, there is no legal basis for his scheme and it will be prosecuted as criminal (not civil) tax evasion. There is no statute of limitations available to him either.
LMK if you need more information,
Fern