- Aug 24, 2006
- 14
- 0
- 0
Hello,
I'm looking to build a budget system for a dual monitor rig. The purpose of this system is primarily to play online poker. I do some very light video editing light photoshop work but no games will be played on this rig. I have an xbox360 and this is just fine for games. Anyhow getting back on point I'm undecided about what would provide better performance, or if there would be any noticable performance difference.
I currently have a Samsung 204b Syncmaster and have been using it with the vga cable and I'm satisfied with it's performance. I want to purchase another one so I can have a dual monitor display but my computer is sorely outdated so I'm going to build a budget rig.
I was planning on purchasing an AM2 socket motherboard (with AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+) coupled with a dual dvi video card such as X1650PRO. But when looking through some reviews I came across the 690G chipset motherboards that have integrated graphics onboard with DVI + D-Sub video ports, such as the GIGABYTE GA-MA69GM-S2H. Since I don't have any plans to play games I'm curious if there is going to be any obvious advantage to going with the video card rig versus the integrated graphics option?
I wonder if there is any performance advantage when connecting via dual DVI versus using the Vga and dvi link instead?
Since I use the 204b via VGA currently I haven't had any issues as noted by many people when using the DVI input. That really has me concerned since I have had to replace my monitor once when I experienced several rows of dead pixels. My local Best Buy has a LG L246WP-BN for 479.99 plus tax, which is considerably more than the 309.99 (289.99 after rebates) of the Samsung from NewEgg. But it offers a bigger desktop and widescreen if I decide to use it for the Xbox360 when unwinding after a long 8 hour multi-tabling poker session. I know every LCD has pros and cons but maybe the LG would be a better choice?
Hopefully someone can help clarify my concerns ...
Worthwhile to purchase the video card + mobo instead of the mobo with integrated graphics to save a few bucks if I'm not doing any games or 3d rendering?
Also any advantage to using dual dvi with the samsungs versus a mobo with dvi + d-sub video port?
Do the concerns about using the Samsung 204b with dvi concern you enough to consider an alternative (1600x1200 or greater resolution preferred) even if it means paying another $100-150 for a larger 24" screen?
Thanks.
I'm looking to build a budget system for a dual monitor rig. The purpose of this system is primarily to play online poker. I do some very light video editing light photoshop work but no games will be played on this rig. I have an xbox360 and this is just fine for games. Anyhow getting back on point I'm undecided about what would provide better performance, or if there would be any noticable performance difference.
I currently have a Samsung 204b Syncmaster and have been using it with the vga cable and I'm satisfied with it's performance. I want to purchase another one so I can have a dual monitor display but my computer is sorely outdated so I'm going to build a budget rig.
I was planning on purchasing an AM2 socket motherboard (with AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+) coupled with a dual dvi video card such as X1650PRO. But when looking through some reviews I came across the 690G chipset motherboards that have integrated graphics onboard with DVI + D-Sub video ports, such as the GIGABYTE GA-MA69GM-S2H. Since I don't have any plans to play games I'm curious if there is going to be any obvious advantage to going with the video card rig versus the integrated graphics option?
I wonder if there is any performance advantage when connecting via dual DVI versus using the Vga and dvi link instead?
Since I use the 204b via VGA currently I haven't had any issues as noted by many people when using the DVI input. That really has me concerned since I have had to replace my monitor once when I experienced several rows of dead pixels. My local Best Buy has a LG L246WP-BN for 479.99 plus tax, which is considerably more than the 309.99 (289.99 after rebates) of the Samsung from NewEgg. But it offers a bigger desktop and widescreen if I decide to use it for the Xbox360 when unwinding after a long 8 hour multi-tabling poker session. I know every LCD has pros and cons but maybe the LG would be a better choice?
Hopefully someone can help clarify my concerns ...
Worthwhile to purchase the video card + mobo instead of the mobo with integrated graphics to save a few bucks if I'm not doing any games or 3d rendering?
Also any advantage to using dual dvi with the samsungs versus a mobo with dvi + d-sub video port?
Do the concerns about using the Samsung 204b with dvi concern you enough to consider an alternative (1600x1200 or greater resolution preferred) even if it means paying another $100-150 for a larger 24" screen?
Thanks.