I actually like the new Trend Micro a lot, excellent security and very light EXCEPT for this long standing bug that they still didn't fix for a year.....If you're happy with ESET just stay with it. I use their A/V (not Internet Security) and I don't find it to be a "heavy" piece of software.
Trend is worth looking at. Decent piece of software.
I have a 3 year license for Webfruit SecureNowhere AV, as you said, it is plagued with so many false positives, now when I get a virus while using WSA I cannot be sure if it's reall a virus or a false positive so I have to go and research it on virustotal.com, no thanks, I have no time for this junk.You sure it wasn't Firefox's fault? It can be notoriously slow.
As for just sticking with ESET, it's twofold: I've seen a few roundups that seem to indicate NOD32 has slipped, and at $60 I was looking for a cheaper alternative.
Another reason I ask is these tests tend to focus on tests that don't really mirror real world use. I tried Webroot's AV product and it was a gigantic pain in the ass. Constant false positives on harmless Web sites, not letting me override the block, etc. I removed it after a week. You don't get reports like that from AV-Test, you get them from users.
W0w Microsoft Security Essentials is not included in this protection test ... should I worry ? (I'm currently using Security Essentials on my Win 8.1)
They've been disqualified from these tests many months ago as they failed any sort of certification to be even included in these tests. That's the same time which Microsoft advised users that they should rely on a full fledged proper AV rather than just using MSE/Windows PretenderW0w Microsoft Security Essentials is not included in this protection test ... should I worry ? (I'm currently using Security Essentials on my Win 8.1)
W0w Microsoft Security Essentials is not included in this protection test ... should I worry ? (I'm currently using Security Essentials on my Win 8.1)
Worry ... No. Instead find another A/V and periodically scan with your favorite virus/ malware finding programs. My minimum (10 15 minutes) scan is TDSSKiller and AdwCleaner from Bleeping computer.
According to this comparitive test record from June 2014, MSE on XP catches almost nothing. http://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/windows-xp/ You can click on the OS you wish to check on and see the last several test results. Defender on Win8.1 has a zero score and MSE on Win7 has a score of (1/2) one half a point.
My experience with Bit Defender free is that no interaction or payment is needed after install and log-in. I stop auto scan and scan (rarely) as necessary. It is very low impact.
I use Bit Defender on the relatives XP, Vista, Win7, and Win8.1 computers also because any interaction is a poor idea for most of them.
Very g00d choice.Bitdefender Free and Sandboxie here. Throw in NoScrip for good measure. I scan the computer with Malwarebytes and superantispyware, Herdprotect, Freefixer, Adwcleaner and several others. Not to mention I scan all downloaded files with virustotal.
You're one SICK SOB GEEK - I stick with McAfee AVERT Stinger [64] - LOLNot gamer friendly when you're a hacker though. :\ So I don't used anti-virus on the desktop which is more of my gaming computer. Bitdefender messes with debugging. So if you have some mod or whatever that uses debugging Bitdefender will interfere.
