• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Opinion on Boy Carrying Ceremonial Knife to School

NY Times article:

*****************************************************

A Sikh Boy's Little Dagger Sets Off a Mighty Din
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS

ONTREAL ¡X Canada is proud that it is one of the world's most welcoming nations to immigrants, so tolerant that several major cities have populations that are more than one-third foreign born ¡X without producing a political backlash.

But Gurbaj Singh, a 12-year-old Sikh boy who immigrated here from a small village in the Punjab, learned the limits of Canadian tolerance in the schoolyard of his new elementary school last November.

Advertisement




While Gurbaj was playing basketball, his 4-inch kirpan ¡X the ceremonial curved dagger Sikh men are obliged to wear at all times, even while sleeping ¡X jostled loose and fell to the ground. A startled parent noticed the blade, and reported the incident to the principal.

Gurbaj found himself facing his principal, who ordered the boy to hand over his kirpan.

Since the age of 5, Gurbaj said, he has never taken off his kirpan, which in the Sikh faith symbolizes the sovereignty of man and serves as a reminder to go to the defense of others in distress.

So he walked home instead, igniting a legal struggle that has embroiled the working-class neighborhood of Lasalle and tested the limits of religious freedom in this multicultural society.

Gurbaj's act of conscience has caused him to miss months of school, and it has made him a celebrity of sorts here and as far away as India, while igniting months of radio talk show debate and fierce dueling editorials in both French and English language newspapers over minority rights.

The case has been winding its way through the courts. The provincial government of Quebec announced in late May that it would appeal a Superior Court ruling that said Gurbaj could wear his blade to school as long as it was securely enclosed in a wooden sheath tied tightly shut and remained tucked under his shirt.

"The maintenance of security in schools," said the Quebec justice minister, Paul B?mgin, "requires zero tolerance for the carrying of knives."

Gurbaj and his family say that they will go all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary, and that if they lose there they will be forced to move to either Ontario or British Columbia, provinces with large Sikh populations where schools do not prohibit kirpans.

"I cannot part with my kirpan because it is part of the obligation I accepted when I took my baptism," Gurbaj said in an interview. "I am determined to stand up for my rights."

In April, when the court order allowed Gurbaj to return to school with his kirpan, he was met by dozens of angry parents, many of whom kept their children home for several days in protest. Accompanied by a police escort, Gurbaj was forced to endure a shower of racial and anti-immigrant insults from some of the adults.

For a boy of 12 in a new country, Gurbaj appears remarkably composed under all the pressure. He has an easy wide smile and curls his brow thoughtfully before answering questions.

He appears to have blended his native and Canadian cultures, spending his spare time playing basketball and searching the Web on his computer in his bedroom, which has pictures of the sacred Sikh gurus and his kirpan collection. He wears his hair tied up in a scarf called the patka and, under religious law, promises never to shave, drink alcohol or eat meat.

He says he has never gotten into a fight, and would never think of using his kirpan as a weapon. "The kirpan is not a knife, it is a religious symbol," he said.

Gurbaj's defenders say that many Sikh students have been wearing kirpans in schools in the United States, Britain and Canada for years without any violent incident.

The school administration and many parents at the Ste. Catherine Laboure primary school have a very different view. For them, Gurbaj's claim to religious freedom is a potential threat.

"He is a very pacific boy but we are concerned about the dagger," said Danielle Descoteaux, the school principal. "An object like that has no place in a school."

Real Nadeau, a sales manager and parent of two children at the school, noted that dozens of other Sikh children at Ste. Catherine Laboure wore pendants representing the kirpan to fulfill their religious obligations.

"With all the violence that appears in schools these days," Mr. Nadeau said, "why allow a weapon in school?"

Gurbaj said his religious conscience would not allow him to wear a kirpan facsimile.

With the Sikh population in Canada having reached nearly half a million and growing rapidly, the presence of kirpans in schools is not a new issue. The Peel Board of Education in Ontario Province, for instance, was ordered in a 1990 court ruling to allow students to carry kirpans to school, as long as they were no more than seven inches long and thoroughly secured in a sheath.

Only about 12,000 Sikhs live in Quebec Province, a fact that may partly explain why the kirpan is still an issue here. But Quebec Canadians have a different view of multiculturalism than much of the rest of Canada, with many preferring the French republican tradition of the melting pot over the concept of people from separate cultures living in harmony while retaining their differences.

"Quebec believes in a dominant Quebec culture," noted Julius Grey, a civil rights lawyer representing Gurbaj. "Other cultures are welcome but they must move in a constellation around the sun."

**********************************************
 
No I believe he has absolutely no right to carry that knife if others are not allowed to. He can wear a turban or whatever if that's part of his religion but knives pose a potential threat and if other children can't wear them then he can't. An immigrant should be able to keep their culture as long as it doesn't overide laws in the country they are visiting. That's common sense.
 
my religion says i can have a desert eagle .50 in my belt at all times but no one seems to care about my views and beliefs! :disgust::|
 
Dude... a knife is a knife. He knows the rules. Anyone that gets caught knowingly bringing a knife to school needs to get tagged. We can't afford not to.

nik
 
Originally posted by: Garfang
No knives, weapons, or daggers in school. It's the rule, OK?

Freakin whiners.

*Agree* **CONFIRMED** 😉

Who the hell doesn't know/care that you can't take friggin' weapons to school with them?
 
Originally posted by: guapo337
think of it not as a dangerous knife but as a religious relic. if someone told you (if you were a devout christian) that you couldn't wear your crucifix as it was dangerous, would you still want to wear it? it's the same thing.. think of the knife as simply a religious symbol.
But it's against the law to have a knife. That is what is at issue here. As mentioned below what if a desert eagle is somebody's religious symbol? Or a poisonous snake that hangs around their neck? Or a crossbow that they have to carry for religious reasons.


 
Hmmm.. I see both points of view..

I know it has nothing to do with this.. but here in Oregon.. If your religon prohibits you from wearing a helmet (like, for a bike, or motorized scooter).. then you don't have to wear one...

What do you think about that?
 
kirpan

I don't think so..

My religion needs me to drop my pants and moonwalk across the classroom to the theme of Gilligans Island....

Oddly enough, I got suspended too....






I know numerous sikhs and I've never known one to carry a kirpan, btw Anand is sikh isn't he, yet I bet he doesn't carry a sword with him wherever he goes...
 
Originally posted by: guapo337
think of it not as a dangerous knife but as a religious relic. if someone told you (if you were a devout christian) that you couldn't wear your crucifix as it was dangerous, would you still want to wear it? it's the same thing.. think of the knife as simply a religious symbol.


So I can wear a shotgun around my neck, provided it has a bar on it that makes it resemble a cross?

A man wielding a 4 inch blade or a man wielding a crucifix..which would I think could do me bodily harm?



I'd like to see him get that kirpan through the metal detector at JFK airport...
 
What I think is stupid is that this 4" blade is considered a huge danger. hell, you could stab someone with a pencil and get a deeper wound than 4". They've also got a whole PE locker full of baseball bats, but the kids are suppsoed to use those.....
 
As soon as some bully muscles the kirpan away from the Sikh kid, it becomes a weapon. And weapons should not be allowed in school. That?s all there is to it.
 
Originally posted by: Garfang
No knives, weapons, or daggers in school. It's the rule, OK?

Freakin whiners.
No. The whiners are the pople that instated the Zero Tolerance rules in the first place. Zero Tolerance is one of the most ridiculous concepts ever created IMO. Think about it, human beings pride themselves on being able to make rational informed decisions based on a variety of factors, yet with Zero Tolerance, you take this ability out of the equation. People are being expelled from schools for bringing mouth wash. I read about a senior who was expelled 2 weeks before his graduation because he had forgotten that he had left a nunting knife in his locked tool box on his truck, and informed school officials that he had it. The officials promptly expelled him and denied him the opportunity to graduate. He had his full ride scholarship to GeorgeTown revoked BTW. I attend a small private College Preparatory Academy with grades k-12. Last year a Kindergardener was suspended for playing Cowboys and Indians. Since we do not have a Zero Tolerance rule at my school, the Board of Trustees overturned this decision, but still the fact that the decision was made in the first place was ludicrous.
 
Originally posted by: Garfang
As soon as some bully muscles the kirpan away from the Sikh kid, it becomes a weapon. And weapons should not be allowed in school. That?s all there is to it.

If they kept the criminals out of school, it wouldn't be an issue, would it?
 
Originally posted by: Nitemare
kirpan

I don't think so..

My religion needs me to drop my pants and moonwalk across the classroom to the theme of Gilligans Island....

Oddly enough, I got suspended too....






I know numerous sikhs and I've never known one to carry a kirpan, btw Anand is sikh isn't he, yet I bet he doesn't carry a sword with him wherever he goes...
Which religion are you again? Is it a documented religion? Assuming it is, and assuming that you made prior arrangements to do your religious dance so they do not disturb class, you should be entitled to excercise your religious freedom. Of course that is how it is in America. Also your next statement is ridiculous. You are arguing the extremes. Extremes cannot and should not be argued because they do not apply to the area of discussion. If you make some sort of "crude shaped cross" with a shotgun, that is obviously not the same as a crucifix. And being that you made the "cross" yourself and it is not in fact required to carry that exact cross around by your religion, than your point is moot.
 
Zero tolerance is lame. they kicked out a 2nd grader (i think) for drawing a gun.

there have been reports of girls getting kicked out for giving tylanol to others for cramps!

it is going to far. it needs to be redone.

oh and the boy should be able to carry it. hope he wins
 
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Garfang
As soon as some bully muscles the kirpan away from the Sikh kid, it becomes a weapon. And weapons should not be allowed in school. That?s all there is to it.

If they kept the criminals out of school, it wouldn't be an issue, would it?
And just how would you propose to do that?

 
Freakin whiners.
No. The whiners are the pople that instated the Zero Tolerance rules in the first place. Zero Tolerance is one of the most ridiculous concepts ever created IMO. Think about it, human beings pride themselves on being able to make rational informed decisions based on a variety of factors, yet with Zero Tolerance, you take this ability out of the equation. People are being expelled from schools for bringing mouth wash. I read about a senior who was expelled 2 weeks before his graduation because he had forgotten that he had left a nunting knife in his locked tool box on his truck, and informed school officials that he had it. The officials promptly expelled him and denied him the opportunity to graduate. He had his full ride scholarship to GeorgeTown revoked BTW. I attend a small private College Preparatory Academy with grades k-12. Last year a Kindergardener was suspended for playing Cowboys and Indians. Since we do not have a Zero Tolerance rule at my school, the Board of Trustees overturned this decision, but still the fact that the decision was made in the first place was ludicrous.
That's right and I hope we all agree that such cases are stupid, but in this case I still don't think he should be carrying a 4" blade to school.

 
Back
Top