Operation Summer Pulse

Witling

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2003
1,448
0
0
The following story originally appeared in Straits Times, a major Singapore paper. The link appears below but that copy of the article has been archieved and is available only to subscribers. This reproduction came from Link.. I've bolded some of the material. This story is essentially unreported in the US press, hence the obscure source. One interpretation of the exercise is that China needs to get prepared to take on seven carrier groups simultaneously. That view is expressed at one point in the article below.

he following story is taken from http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/topstories/story/0,4386,259015,00.html
----
Seven aircraft carriers to move within striking distance of China; Taiwan forces slated to join in drill

The United States is planning a massive show of force in the Pacific Ocean near China to register a point with Beijing.

In an exercise codenamed Operation Summer Pulse 04, it is expected to arrange for an unprecedented seven aircraft carrier strike groups (CSGs) to rendezvous in waters a safe distance away from the Chinese coastline - but still within striking distance - after mid-July.

This will be the first time in US naval history that it sends seven of its 12 CSGs to just one region.

According to a Department of Defence statement, Summer Pulse is to test out a new Fleet Response Plan (FRP) aimed at enhancing the American Navy's combat power and readiness in a time of crisis.

The FRP calls for the despatching of six 'forward deployed' or 'ready to surge' CSGs to a trouble spot within 30 days, and an additional two within 90 days.

Although the statement does not say where the seven CSGs will exercise, the Status of the Navy website said the USS Carl Vinson, Abraham Lincoln, John C Stennis and Kitty Hawk were in the Pacific Ocean as of yesterday.

The USS Enterprise and Harry Truman are in the Atlantic Ocean while USS George Washington is in the Persian Gulf.

According to a posting on Sina.com, an influential website in China, the signs point to a gathering of all seven CSGs in the Pacific.

Sources in Beijing say China's reading is that Summer Pulse is being mounted with it as the target audience, a suspicion reinforced by reports that Taiwanese forces are slated to join in the drill.

Clearly, given Beijing's repeated warning that it will use force, as a last resort and whatever the cost, to stop Taiwanese independence, the US feels it needs to send Beijing a message.

From past deployment patterns, the US usually despatches one CSG to a trouble spot as a reminder of its presence.

It did so several times in the past when tension was high in the Taiwan Strait.

It sends two to indicate serious concern, as was the case when China test-fired missiles over the strait in 1996.

In a combat situation, it deploys three to four, which was what it did in the Gulf War in the early 1990s and the recent Iraqi war.

But never before has it sent in peace time seven CSGs to the same theatre.


The implications for China are grave.

According to Kanwa Defence News, which specialises in Chinese military matters, Beijing can cope with just one CSG currently.

'But in five to 10 years, it can certainly take on seven,' said Mr Chang Hong-yi, head of Kanwa, in an interview with The Straits Times.

'China's military potential is enormous and in terms of military technology, the gap with the US is closing fast,' he added.

However, a Chinese military source who declined to be identified is more sanguine.

'Even now, China can easily take on two CSGs,' he said but conceded that there was no way it could face seven all at the same time.

This means that if China has to wage war over Taiwan, it has to be able to land and seize control of the island within the first 30 days.

Otherwise, under the FRP, six CSGs may well arrive to join in the battle.

'All this leaves China with no choice but to start and end the war with lightning speed,' said the source.

Politically, Summer Pulse is likely to be seen by many Chinese as naked intimidation.


'This is gunboat diplomacy in the 21st century,' the source remarked, adding that it would remind the Chinese people of their century-long deep humiliation by Western powers - and put Sino-US relations at peril.
----
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I've read that all of the carriers are not going to be off of the coast of China or anything like that...instead this is to see if the US can handle this many carrier groups out at sea at the same time.

Either way, it's a very impressive feat.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
Interesting....but I find Strait Times a very pro-CommieChina leading paper
It always posts news articles talking trash about Taiwan and its democracy while glossing over China's problems.


But I remember reading this on Thurs or Friday which is sort of connected:


Pentagon War Game Based on China Threat to Taiwan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A crisis-simulation drill based on a growing Chinese military threat to Taiwan was played out this week by U.S. decision makers, Pentagon officials said on Thursday.

The exercise, called Dragon's Thunder, was held on Monday at the Pentagon's National Defense University, or NDU, even as China prepared to stage a mock invasion of the self-governing island.

Pentagon officials cautioned against reading anything into the timing of the strategy drill or into the deployment of seven U.S. aircraft carrier strike groups worldwide simultaneously.

"Neither the deployment of carrier strike groups worldwide nor this NDU tabletop exercise should be seen as sending a signal to any specific country," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Flex Plexico, a Pentagon spokesman.

The Defense Department announced June 5 it would deploy seven carriers to demonstrate a new Navy plan for "surging" its operations to project force if necessary.

China's state media said on Tuesday the People's Liberation Army was gearing for an amphibious landing in land, sea and air exercises on Dongshan Island, a response to tension across the Taiwan Strait.

The scenario in the U.S. exercises, ninth in a series prompted by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, "specifically examined responses to an increasing possibility of military action by China against Taiwan," the National Defense University said.

Details of the scenario and "lessons learned" were classified, but such crisis-simulation was meant to be as realistic as possible, said David Thomas, a defense university spokesman.

"Participants examined the gravity, complexity and difficulty inherent in responding to a sequence of escalating tensions between China and Taiwan," he added in a statement.

"The exercise sought to understand the full range of policy options and associated consequences available to the U.S. to restore stability to the Taiwan Straits and surrounding region, while avoiding nuclear confrontation with China," NDU said.


Opening the session, Navy Secretary Gordon England noted the value of such games for addressing "some of the complex security problems the nation confronts today," it said.

Participants were from Rumsfeld's office, the Pentagon's Joint Staff, U.S. Pacific Command, White House National Security Council, National Intelligence Council and departments of State and Commerce, according to NDU.

Also taking part were 14 members of Congress, including Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, a Maryland Republican who chairs the House of Representatives Projection Forces Committee.
Text
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
What a waste of resources! Let's be honest . . . if China decides it wants Taiwan . . . they are going to take Taiwan. And there's nothing substantitive that we will do about it other than bitch and moan . . . possibly revoke MFN.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
What a waste of resources! Let's be honest . . . if China decides it wants Taiwan . . . they are going to take Taiwan. And there's nothing substantitive that we will do about it other than bitch and moan . . . possibly revoke MFN.

I read about this a month or two ago.

You have to train anyways so it's probably not that big of a waste of resources.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
What a waste of resources! Let's be honest . . . if China decides it wants Taiwan . . . they are going to take Taiwan. And there's nothing substantitive that we will do about it other than bitch and moan . . . possibly revoke MFN.

I read about this a month or two ago.

You have to train anyways so it's probably not that big of a waste of resources.

yeah, having sailors sit around at port doing nothing is REALLY a waste of resources.