- Sep 10, 2001
- 11,709
- 8
- 81
I'd give our troops today more credit than that. Most probably joined because it was a way for them to either learn a career (including a career in the Serives) or get money for schooling for a career. Of course they are going to be well discliplined and not question orders given to them, what good would they be as an Army if they did.Originally posted by: Zebo
He's assuming most of these "volunteer" force can read. I was in and can tell you 1/2 was illiterate 1/2 are in cause they have no other choice..it's either strave or join up. In veitnam there was a draft, subseqeuntly the troops represented a diverse IQ pool.. I seriously doubt any of this volunteer force would feel the same as he does since they are heavily screaned and court marshalled or discharged for having independent thought. I certainly can't imagine a guy like hackworth a col who said in 1971 we will loose vietnam in a TV interview..probably cost him general even so.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'd give our troops today more credit than that. Most probably joined because it was a way for them to either learn a career (including a career in the Serives) or get money for schooling for a career. Of course they are going to be well discliplined and not question orders given to them, what good would they be as an Army if they did.Originally posted by: Zebo
He's assuming most of these "volunteer" force can read. I was in and can tell you 1/2 was illiterate 1/2 are in cause they have no other choice..it's either strave or join up. In veitnam there was a draft, subseqeuntly the troops represented a diverse IQ pool.. I seriously doubt any of this volunteer force would feel the same as he does since they are heavily screaned and court marshalled or discharged for having independent thought. I certainly can't imagine a guy like hackworth a col who said in 1971 we will loose vietnam in a TV interview..probably cost him general even so.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'd give our troops today more credit than that. Most probably joined because it was a way for them to either learn a career (including a career in the Serives) or get money for schooling for a career. Of course they are going to be well discliplined and not question orders given to them, what good would they be as an Army if they did.Originally posted by: Zebo
He's assuming most of these "volunteer" force can read. I was in and can tell you 1/2 was illiterate 1/2 are in cause they have no other choice..it's either strave or join up. In veitnam there was a draft, subseqeuntly the troops represented a diverse IQ pool.. I seriously doubt any of this volunteer force would feel the same as he does since they are heavily screaned and court marshalled or discharged for having independent thought. I certainly can't imagine a guy like hackworth a col who said in 1971 we will loose vietnam in a TV interview..probably cost him general even so.
JO's meaning "Junior Officers"? No, they won't be chasing screwups if they have any NCOs with them who are worth a damn.Originally posted by: tnitsuj
"Of course they are going to be well discliplined and not question orders given to them, what good would they be as an Army if they did"
theoretically. Most are, but a large majority of a JO's time is spent chasing after f*** ups.
Originally posted by: burnedout
JO's meaning "Junior Officers"? No, they won't be chasing screwups if they have any NCOs with them who are worth a damn.Originally posted by: tnitsuj
"Of course they are going to be well discliplined and not question orders given to them, what good would they be as an Army if they did"
theoretically. Most are, but a large majority of a JO's time is spent chasing after f*** ups.
Originally posted by: SwissArmyBilly
You are right Red. Politicians have historically used our service men as pawns for their own ends. It is disgusting that they think our boys are suddenly chess pieces when it suits them, instead of fathers, husbands and sons.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: burnedout
JO's meaning "Junior Officers"? No, they won't be chasing screwups if they have any NCOs with them who are worth a damn.Originally posted by: tnitsuj
"Of course they are going to be well discliplined and not question orders given to them, what good would they be as an Army if they did"
theoretically. Most are, but a large majority of a JO's time is spent chasing after f*** ups.
That is just coming from the experience of my Wife who is a JO O-2, and all her other JO friends who seem to spend tons of time cleaning up little messes in thier divisions. Thier Chiefs do a lot of the work, but it all seems to come back to them.
Open letter from Vietnam vet to GI's in Iraq
Roger that. NCOs are the real backbone of the Army. Our officers rarely got involved with enlisted matters except for UCMJ or awards. Even on UCMJ matters, the company or battalion CO dished out the punishment. All the PL's (2nd and 1st LT) did during AR-15 hearings was stand there and give recommendations. NCOs take care of the enlisted soldiers in the U.S. Army.Originally posted by: mastertech01
Believe it or not there are quite a few JO's with their own messes to clean up. A young man is a young man and they make mistakes just like a private. They tend to have an umbrella of security from the Officer Corps to keep these things quiet of course. Of course when the privates out number the officers 100-1 or so it certainly magnifies the enlisted group's problems. The NCO most often is the one who keeps the enlisted soldier in line, tends to the soldiers family problems, and takes the slam dunk when the soldier screws up. Very rarely in my experience did the JO even get involved in soldier personal problems. It went from soldier to first line supervisor (NCO) to Platoon Sgt (NCO) 1st Sergeant (NCO) to Commander. Often the NCO got to visit the Command Sergeant Major for a followup butt chewing as well. Politics galore and sh!t ALWAYS rolls downhill.
Originally posted by: Zebo
He's assuming most of these "volunteer" force can read. I was in and can tell you 1/2 was illiterate 1/2 are in cause they have no other choice..it's either strave or join up. In veitnam there was a draft, subseqeuntly the troops represented a diverse IQ pool.. I seriously doubt any of this volunteer force would feel the same as he does since they are heavily screaned and court marshalled or discharged for having independent thought. I certainly can't imagine a guy like hackworth a col who said in 1971 we will loose vietnam in a TV interview..probably cost him general even so.
Originally posted by: burnedout
Roger that. NCOs are the real backbone of the Army. Our officers rarely got involved with enlisted matters except for UCMJ or awards. Even on UCMJ matters, the company or battalion CO dished out the punishment. All the PL's (2nd and 1st LT) did during AR-15 hearings was stand there and give recommendations. NCOs take care of the enlisted soldiers in the U.S. Army.Originally posted by: mastertech01
Believe it or not there are quite a few JO's with their own messes to clean up. A young man is a young man and they make mistakes just like a private. They tend to have an umbrella of security from the Officer Corps to keep these things quiet of course. Of course when the privates out number the officers 100-1 or so it certainly magnifies the enlisted group's problems. The NCO most often is the one who keeps the enlisted soldier in line, tends to the soldiers family problems, and takes the slam dunk when the soldier screws up. Very rarely in my experience did the JO even get involved in soldier personal problems. It went from soldier to first line supervisor (NCO) to Platoon Sgt (NCO) 1st Sergeant (NCO) to Commander. Often the NCO got to visit the Command Sergeant Major for a followup butt chewing as well. Politics galore and sh!t ALWAYS rolls downhill.