Only three weeks and POOF! XBOX 360 Gone.

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Is there a point? (Edit: I can't even invoke Oldsmoboat's Law since you don't claim it's funny :) )

With a failure rate of 30% (though it may be higher), there are over 900,000 people just like him with 2+ failures.

Even MS admits the original 360 design is unreliable. Zephyr helps, and Falcon hopefully helps even more.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
He has high levels of persuasion. By high I mean none.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Is there a point? (Edit: I can't even invoke Oldsmoboat's Law since you don't claim it's funny :) )

With a failure rate of 30% (though it may be higher), there are over 900,000 people just like him with 2+ failures.

Even MS admits the original 360 design is unreliable. Zephyr helps, and Falcon hopefully helps even more.

You know, your calculations leave out a key component - the amount of time it takes to fail. ;) That seems to vary widely.

It doesn't surprise me that this was linked from a crappy website like the Consumerist. Way to get on that story guys. :thumbsup: Of course I would have linked to one of the stories from a couple of months ago about the $1 billion charge for the repairs instead of giving some mouth-breather an audience. ;)

I'm not defending Microsoft - the failure rate is inexcusable. I just really hate the Consumerist.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
You know, your calculations leave out a key component - the amount of time it takes to fail. That seems to vary widely.

True, I was/am just a little puzzled about what's thread-worthy of a 360 failure rant video when this kind of failure is common and we all know it happens.

I missed whatever was novel or funny about this rant in particular, though I see this could be amusing:
He has high levels of persuasion. By high I mean none.

Still . . . is that all there is? :confused:
 

VIAN

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2003
6,575
1
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
You know, your calculations leave out a key component - the amount of time it takes to fail. That seems to vary widely.

True, I was/am just a little puzzled about what's thread-worthy of a 360 failure rant video when this kind of failure is common and we all know it happens.

I missed whatever was novel or funny about this rant in particular, though I see this could be amusing:
He has high levels of persuasion. By high I mean none.

Still . . . is that all there is? :confused:
The point of this thread is not just to showcase another sob story. It's about the fact that after waiting 2 months, he got less than 1 month of playtime before it broke again. The video is not very pleasant, but less than 1 month isn't a reasonable length of time after a repair. In fact, I don't think people have looked into that issue. Sure it may take about 1 year to fail. But after MS wastes 2 months of you time, how long will the returned console last you then. I would've expected it to last another year, but I was sorely mistaken. Just think about this - if he sends it again, that would be almost half a year without the 360 operational. And how long will it last when it comes back the second time?

Originally posted by: TecHNooB
Is that you?
No it isn't me.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
I'll tell you what not to buy, that dumbass "pornstar" shirt he's wearing. What a goof. Yeah, let me go out and buy a PS3 which has no games I want to play instead of waiting for the next revision of the 360. Yeah, I think I'll do that. :roll:

BTW, my Elite is working just fine. And I had it since launch. Maybe he means, instead of a core or platinum 360, everyone should get an Elite instead. :)