Only getting 2500 3d marks....

[BD2003]

Looks like I'm way underscoring in 3dmark 2001 with 2500. Similar systems (Duron 1000, Radeon LE w/hyperz at 183). And using win2k.

 

[JayPatel]

sounds about right actually... my rig get 2550+

 

[BD2003]

Well, checking on the online result browser, I should be getting somewhere near 3000-3500. Using default settings.

 

[erikiksaz]

what's your system

 

[JJ650]

I have socred 3346 with my rig setup. Tweaked out of course.

My 2001 score

here is what I scored with a 900 Tbird;

900 MHZ


*EDIT*

Added the 900 system.
Kinda surprised the score didn't scale better with the stronger CPU in power.

Video card holding me back. Notice the polygon ( 1 vs 8 light sources). Same exact score. Of course that is cause of the vid card.
At first I thought something was wrong. Duh-huh

 

[GL]

I've gotten just under 2800 with an AIW Radeon at 183MHz and a PIII800->960 in Win2k. I'd say you should be able to get a bit higher than 2500, maybe to 2700 or even 2800.

-GL

 

[RagingGuardian]

I'm scoring a square 3300 with a Duron 1Ghz and Radeon VIVO and Win2k🙂 I can't link or I would post the link to my score.

3dmark 2001

 

[BD2003]

Looking at the result for JJs 900mhz system compared to mine, I see something odd, which makes me thing I have some sort of t&L setting wrong. My cpu is about 10% faster, and im using win2k, but theyre otherwise identical. My multitextured fill rate is past his so its got to be the tnl. High polygon count scores are roughly a third to a half of his. Dot 3 bump mapping is behind. Vertex shader is half his speed, and point sprites are about a 4th of his. But we're both using hardware tnl. What could it be? A specifi registry setting?

 

[BD2003]

Ragingguardian has an even more identical system to mine, yet again he's way outscoring me. How did you tweak yours? Mine is a LE Overclocked to 183 and hyperz enabled.

 

[Phuz]

2500 here..
Duron 1ghz
GF2 GTS
256mb