Only 3.4 Million Honeycomb Tablets Sold?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Until they have a shipping product, it's vaporware.

You can get the developer release right now, and I believe W8 tablets have been demo'd at trade shows. W8 isn't vaporware, it will come to market. Vaporware refers to products that never make it to market.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
You can put the dev preview of Win8 on a tablet right now if you want. Come on...you aren't really calling the next major iteration of Windows vaporware, are you? That seems a little silly. You can argue that you don't think it will have as long a battery life as an iPad, or opine on how popular you think it will become, but obviously it will exist in some fashion, come on...
 

ChAoTiCpInOy

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2006
6,442
1
81
You can get the developer release right now, and I believe W8 tablets have been demo'd at trade shows. W8 isn't vaporware, it will come to market. Vaporware refers to products that never make it to market.

You can put the dev preview of Win8 on a tablet right now if you want. Come on...you aren't really calling the next major iteration of Windows vaporware, are you? That seems a little silly. You can argue that you don't think it will have as long a battery life as an iPad, or opine on how popular you think it will become, but obviously it will exist in some fashion, come on...

I would argue that it's till a year off and yes we do have a developer preview, but in the end. You're comparing a device that isn't anywhere near final to a device that is already on its 2nd iteration and will be on its 3rd when W8 "may" come out.
 

vshah

Lifer
Sep 20, 2003
19,003
24
81
Yes, they are, but what will end up on tablets won't be a full blown distro of W8, or compatible with current Windows programs, and that's what people are expecting/thinking when they hear about Windows on a tablet.

but the same reason for that incompatibility (windows for tablets will be compiled for/running on ARM instruction set) means that battery life should be higher than what most people think of when they hear "windows tablet"
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,828
37
91
Until they have a shipping product, it's vaporware.

way to backpedal :thumbsup:.
just man up, admit you were ignorant about W8. nothing wrong with it, just don't spread FUD and research first. are ya too good to say "oh, i didnt realise that. i'll look up more about it..thaks"????
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Guess I haven't kept up with W8, just re read an article I skimmed earlier, my bad.

It'll be the first version of Windows I won't upgrade to since Windows 286 :(
 

runawayprisoner

Platinum Member
Apr 2, 2008
2,496
0
76
but the same reason for that incompatibility (windows for tablets will be compiled for/running on ARM instruction set) means that battery life should be higher than what most people think of when they hear "windows tablet"

Yes, but they will also disregard it completely when they know that they had to trade off access to every single one of their familiar x86 applications in exchange for that higher battery life figure.

Or battery life would just suck the same as it does right now if x86 is used, so there is no improvement at all... except in hardware.
 

mosco

Senior member
Sep 24, 2002
940
1
76
Kindle Fire sales will be insane, it will be the best selling Android based tablet

The funny thing is, even when the kindle fire comes out, its not going to provide a huge increase on the google stats page, because it won't have the android market on it.
 

vshah

Lifer
Sep 20, 2003
19,003
24
81
Guess I haven't kept up with W8, just re read an article I skimmed earlier, my bad.

It'll be the first version of Windows I won't upgrade to since Windows 286 :(

I'm waiting to see what improvements they make to the core windows desktop experience as well. I might not be the earliest of adopters. The multi tasking implementation looks awesome though

Sent from my Sensation using Tapatalk
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
Yes, but they will also disregard it completely when they know that they had to trade off access to every single one of their familiar x86 applications in exchange for that higher battery life figure.

Or battery life would just suck the same as it does right now if x86 is used, so there is no improvement at all... except in hardware.

Yep. A Windows tablet only interests me if I can run already existing X86 applications. From what I've seen, these tablets will have poor battery life and are more bulky, so it looks like I'll be waiting a few more years at least.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,480
8,340
126
Yep. A Windows tablet only interests me if I can run already existing X86 applications. From what I've seen, these tablets will have poor battery life and are more bulky, so it looks like I'll be waiting a few more years at least.

I think they'll go the way of the Zune and Win7 phones. The Xbox is about the only hardware Microsoft has been able to pull off well.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Yep. A Windows tablet only interests me if I can run already existing X86 applications. From what I've seen, these tablets will have poor battery life and are more bulky, so it looks like I'll be waiting a few more years at least.

Lets not forget by the time W8 launches next fall there will be a new generation of Zacate out there for launch on a new node process. The MSI wind I link uses the 5.9 TDP Zacate they should be able to take that under 3 next time around on 32/28 NM. Also W8 has not even been tuned yet for performance or battery life. So battery life should be much better for W8 tablets that launch next fall.
 

runawayprisoner

Platinum Member
Apr 2, 2008
2,496
0
76
Lets not forget by the time W8 launches next fall there will be a new generation of Zacate out there for launch on a new node process. The MSI wind I link uses the 5.9 TDP Zacate they should be able to take that under 3 next time around on 32/28 NM. Also W8 has not even been tuned yet for performance or battery life. So battery life should be much better for W8 tablets that launch next fall.

Compare that to less than 1W on most ARM SoCs now.

Also TDP is irrelevant because it's only the nominal thermal profile. It's not a representative of how much power the whole system (CPU + chipset) draws. CPU can draw 10W and emit 7W of thermal, and that's still normal.
 

Puddle Jumper

Platinum Member
Nov 4, 2009
2,835
1
0
Compare that to less than 1W on most ARM SoCs now.

Also TDP is irrelevant because it's only the nominal thermal profile. It's not a representative of how much power the whole system (CPU + chipset) draws. CPU can draw 10W and emit 7W of thermal, and that's still normal.

The higher power usage of Zacate doesn't seem to bad when you consider how much faster it is than any ARM SoC on the market. There is always the ULV Ivy Bridge parts as well that will be considerably faster than Zacate and so far ahead of anything ARM offers there is no real point in even comparing their performance.
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,828
37
91
Yep. A Windows tablet only interests me if I can run already existing X86 applications. From what I've seen, these tablets will have poor battery life and are more bulky, so it looks like I'll be waiting a few more years at least.

i suspect there will be some x86 tablets out over the next couple of years. That or if developers are able to figure out rewriting their x86 applicationso_O
Who knows but i think it may push Android aside or perhaps just push its use on down to cheaper tablets?
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Microsoft has been trying to sell tablets since after XP came out. I doubt they are going to succeed now. Like someone else said, this will likely go the way of the Zune and Win7 phones.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Microsoft has been trying to sell tablets since after XP came out. I doubt they are going to succeed now. Like someone else said, this will likely go the way of the Zune and Win7 phones.

The technology of today is more conducive to making a lightweight, long battery life tablets than they were in 2001 when XP Tablet Edition first came out. :p

I don't see W8 tabs matching iPad level sales, but they'll be a solid product, and they'll support ARM. I'm not sure if MS will be locking down the hardware specs for a W8 tablet though, the way they do with WP7 handsets. If they do, hopefully, they choose something powerful.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
The technology of today is more conducive to making a lightweight, long battery life tablets than they were in 2001 when XP Tablet Edition first came out. :p

I don't see W8 tabs matching iPad level sales, but they'll be a solid product, and they'll support ARM. I'm not sure if MS will be locking down the hardware specs for a W8 tablet though, the way they do with WP7 handsets. If they do, hopefully, they choose something powerful.

Can't remember if it was Intel or MS that limited hardware specs for netbooks, IMHO, those restrictions to protect notebooks crippled netbooks in short order...

And yeah, tablets were a pet project of Gates for decades, the technology now exists to make these devices, it must have been frustrating to be relatively powerful back then and not be able to produce what you dreamed about...

The thing is, I think we'll see a hybrid of tablets and notebooks as the next big thing. I'm thinking MBA/UltraBooks with a flip touchscreen.
 
Last edited:

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Can't remember if it was Intel or Apple that limited hardware specs for netbooks, IMHO, those restrictions to protect notebooks crippled netbooks in short order...

Can't blame Apple for that one. They wanted nothing to do with mini notebooks for under $300 when they were coming out with mini notebooks for $1,799 (Macbook Air).

You have to blame Wintel for that. Intel kept Nvidia out of the market, and MS made things worse by restricting the hardware with Windows Starter edition.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Can't remember if it was Intel or MS that limited hardware specs for netbooks, IMHO, those restrictions to protect notebooks crippled netbooks in short order...

Microsoft did that. The Atom powered netbooks weren't powerful enough to run Vista, but they ran XP alright. At a time when MS was trying to phase out XP and push people to Vista, they imposed the restrictions to keep XP at the extreme low end.