- Dec 18, 2003
- 3,628
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: TuxDave
You need some serious lessons on how to wire a breadboard.![]()
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: TuxDave
You need some serious lessons on how to wire a breadboard.![]()
lol, that is actually incorrect (the overflow bit is wrong, no sums over 23 work), the final revision looked a lot better color coding wise (and was correct).
Originally posted by: MagnusTheBrewer
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: TuxDave
You need some serious lessons on how to wire a breadboard.![]()
lol, that is actually incorrect (the overflow bit is wrong, no sums over 23 work), the final revision looked a lot better color coding wise (and was correct).
When breadboarding, getting it to work is almost secondary. The purpose is to organize the circuit to make logical sense and allow for redesign much like commenting in programming. If this was never explained to you in school, they did you a tremendous disservice.
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: MagnusTheBrewer
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: TuxDave
You need some serious lessons on how to wire a breadboard.![]()
lol, that is actually incorrect (the overflow bit is wrong, no sums over 23 work), the final revision looked a lot better color coding wise (and was correct).
When breadboarding, getting it to work is almost secondary. The purpose is to organize the circuit to make logical sense and allow for redesign much like commenting in programming. If this was never explained to you in school, they did you a tremendous disservice.
That would have saved my group an enormous amount of time. We designed the circuit on the computer, tested it (apparently not thoroughly enough), then built it. The TA came around to check it, and no sums >23 worked. So we fixed the design in about 2 minutes. Then we asked if we had to fixed the actual implementation since that would take ~45 minutes and we just wanted to get out of there. The damn TA made us fix it. meh. Our fault I suppose, but still a PITA.
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: Analog
Get out of my digital design class!
In my intro to computer engineering course, we worked with breadboards for the first few labs, and from then on we used VHDL and a programmable logic chip. So much better than screwing around with those breadboards, even relatively simple logic circuits could get very messy to wire.Originally posted by: Analog
Nice Rat's nest. In this century, we use VHDL.![]()
Originally posted by: Gibson486
I hate digital logic. Never like dit, never will. Analog for the win!!!!
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
Originally posted by: Gibson486
I hate digital logic. Never like dit, never will. Analog for the win!!!!
Heh, in the end, everything is analog.
Originally posted by: Gibson486
I hate digital logic. Never like dit, never will. Analog for the win!!!!
Originally posted by: njmodi
Originally posted by: Gibson486
I hate digital logic. Never like dit, never will. Analog for the win!!!!
Digital is so much easier than analog -> 1 and 0only 2 things to learn.
