One and for all: CIA Finds No Evidence Hussein Sought to Arm Terrorists and aluminum tubes "innocuous."

[Zebo]

Text

 

[Tab]

Exactly what I suspected all long, he wanted to keep them for himself! Selfish bastard!

 

[DealMonkey]

Come on Zebo, how many times do you have to be told? It was about liberating the Iraqis, NEVER about WMDs or terrorists or whatever reason du jour you're making up. Come on, say it with me: Lib-er-a-tion. Good.

 

[maluckey]

"under cover of new agricultural facility", "that showed "advances in developing dry storable powder forms of botulinum toxin,"

Aluminum casings.........great for missile material to deliver the above toxins.

The author is basing his statements off of Kays research, and Kay is clearly stating that they DID have dual use programs, and DID order nuclear research equipment. The source is three times removed in your link, and seriously bent by opinion and hearsay statements. To trust the Washington Post to report anything outside of the weather, is asking a lot. Their credibility is about half as good as The Weekly World News.

 

[DealMonkey]

Originally posted by: maluckey
"under cover of new agricultural facility", "that showed "advances in developing dry storable powder forms of botulinum toxin,"

Aluminum casings.........great for missile material to deliver the above toxins.

The author is basing his statements off of Kays research, and Kay is clearly stating that they DID have dual use programs, and DID order nuclear research equipment. The source is three times removed in your link, and seriously bent by opinion and hearsay statements. To trust the Washington Post to report anything outside of the weather, is asking a lot. Their credibility is about half as good as The Weekly World News.

Huh, and I thought the Washington Post was a well-respected paper. By conservatives even. Wow, I guess there's no one left we can trust anymore, is there?

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Huh, and I thought the Washington Post was a well-respected paper. By conservatives even. Wow, I guess there's no one left we can trust anymore, is there?

Don't pay any attention to him The Washington Post is a decent source(notice I didn't claim they were without bias)

CkG

 

[Ldir]

Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Come on Zebo, how many times do you have to be told? It was about liberating the Iraqis, NEVER about WMDs or terrorists or whatever reason du jour you're making up. Come on, say it with me: Lib-er-a-tion. Good.

What is our next story when that falls apart too?

 

[fwtong]

Hearsay is a statement made outside of court. So therefore, all newspaper articles are hearsay. What's wrong with that?

Originally posted by: maluckey
"under cover of new agricultural facility", "that showed "advances in developing dry storable powder forms of botulinum toxin,"

Aluminum casings.........great for missile material to deliver the above toxins.

The author is basing his statements off of Kays research, and Kay is clearly stating that they DID have dual use programs, and DID order nuclear research equipment. The source is three times removed in your link, and seriously bent by opinion and hearsay statements. To trust the Washington Post to report anything outside of the weather, is asking a lot. Their credibility is about half as good as The Weekly World News.

 

[BaliBabyDoc]

"under cover of new agricultural facility", "that showed "advances in developing dry storable powder forms of botulinum toxin,"

Curiously, they have these advances . . . yet no botox.

 

[ReiAyanami]

i guess the dozens of illegal missiles they fired at the start of the war don't exist.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
i guess the dozens of illegal missiles they fired at the start of the war don't exist.

?? Proof?