It pisses me off that the news in the US (from almost all sources) is so sensationalist that they report everything for ratings splendor.
Opinion polls in Palestine showed Hamas winning by a landslide before the election. US news sources have been reporting that for weeks. Yet, after the election, the same US news sources are reporting the Hamas victory as a 'stunning upset.' Every headline seems to have 'upset' in it.
It's not an upset just because their political views are not in line with the US political views when the election results are perfectly inline with predictions. Rather, imo, they're calling it an upset as 'propaganda' to US readers that this can only be a bad thing.
I, for one, have heard so much sh1t talked about Hamas that I can't wait to see what they actually do. If a former terrorist group turn political party decides to rely less on terrorism and more on traditional political means for change, what the hell is so bad about that? I actually would rather see Hamas do something good for once. However, the US news says this will 'throw the mideast into turmoil'.. Well WTF is it already?
BTW, I am a conservative in the US.. But, I think there's a big difference between Hamas terrorists and Hamas the political party.. Anything against the US is called a 'terrorist' right now.
MSNBC
Fox News (associated press - same article?)
CNN (practically the same thing AGAIN)
Reuters
---------------------------------------------
Thread
Mod
Opinion polls in Palestine showed Hamas winning by a landslide before the election. US news sources have been reporting that for weeks. Yet, after the election, the same US news sources are reporting the Hamas victory as a 'stunning upset.' Every headline seems to have 'upset' in it.
It's not an upset just because their political views are not in line with the US political views when the election results are perfectly inline with predictions. Rather, imo, they're calling it an upset as 'propaganda' to US readers that this can only be a bad thing.
I, for one, have heard so much sh1t talked about Hamas that I can't wait to see what they actually do. If a former terrorist group turn political party decides to rely less on terrorism and more on traditional political means for change, what the hell is so bad about that? I actually would rather see Hamas do something good for once. However, the US news says this will 'throw the mideast into turmoil'.. Well WTF is it already?
BTW, I am a conservative in the US.. But, I think there's a big difference between Hamas terrorists and Hamas the political party.. Anything against the US is called a 'terrorist' right now.
MSNBC
Fox News (associated press - same article?)
CNN (practically the same thing AGAIN)
Reuters
---------------------------------------------
Thread
Mod