- Oct 9, 1999
- 15,216
- 3
- 81
Its out on PC, XBOX and PS3.. I would rather do PC like the original but I use the PS3 quite a bit.. ugh.. where should my $60 go..
No, it is terrible.I'd wait until it hits the $10 bargain bin price.
Which is pretty much what I did for Duke Nukem 3D.
All the reviews point to this being a fairly mediocre game. Not terrible, but not worth spending that much money on.
After 12 f*cking years, is this all we have to look forward to?
I'd wait until it hits the $10 bargain bin price.
Which is pretty much what I did for Duke Nukem 3D.
All the reviews point to this being a fairly mediocre game. Not terrible, but not worth spending that much money on.
I had eggs for breakfast. Your mom had sausage.
wait does this mean the world is going to end and pigs will fly?
Terribly awesome at being a major suckfest.terribly awesome
And as I expected, the pro reviewers are complaining about modern issues, not the fact that it doesnt live up to 12 years of hype or the previous game.
So this truly does stink.
Wow... that looks horrible.As much as I love Duke and will buy this anyways, I'd recommend that you read a review and especially watch that Quick Look video (essentially the first 30 minutes of gameplay) before purchasing.
Cons:
-What the FUCK, LINEAR LEVELS? I truly missed box levels where you explore on your own. You are going through one LOOOOOOOONNG passage the whole game. This game plays like any other modern SP FPS.
terribly awesome
I prefer linear levels over confusing designs that are easy to get lost in.
Half-Life and Half-Life 2 are linear designs, and they are great games.
On the other hand, Doom 3 level design was so bad, that I had to buy a walk-through book just to get through the levels.
