OMG!! Dr. burns initials (UK) onto woman's uterus! UPDATE
- Thread starter conjur
- Start date
911paramedic
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2002
- 9,448
- 1
- 76
It's better than the doc that carved his initials in the womans stomach after a c-section. They were about 2" tall or something too. :Q
WHAT THE FVCK IS WRONG WITH YOU!?
take the womans kids away because she's angry over being used as a canvas?!?!
KK
Lifer
- Jan 2, 2001
- 15,903
- 4
- 81
Nothing. Why?
She was also used as a chopping block. Good thing she didn't sue because of that. The damn body part was coming out anyways, maybe this is the way he tests to see if the cauterizer is working. Don't want to cut the body part out and then have the women bleed to death. The woman is only trying to get some money, why shouldn't she. Everybody else does, huh?
KK
feralkid
Lifer
- Jan 28, 2002
- 16,686
- 4,793
- 136
Originally posted by: KK
Nothing. Why?
She was also used as a chopping block. Good thing she didn't sue because of that. The damn body part was coming out anyways, maybe this is the way he tests to see if the cauterizer is working. Don't want to cut the body part out and then have the women bleed to death. The woman is only trying to get some money, why shouldn't she. Everybody else does, huh?
KK
U R 1 sick pup, KK, is it nature or nurture?
KK
Lifer
- Jan 2, 2001
- 15,903
- 4
- 81
Probably nature.
I would like to see the video of this. If the doctor was making a big scene about the whole burning of this uterus then that'd be alittle different, he needs to act professional. But if it was just to test the instrument then what is the harm? I haven't seen the video, could someone please find it?
KK
I would like to see the video of this. If the doctor was making a big scene about the whole burning of this uterus then that'd be alittle different, he needs to act professional. But if it was just to test the instrument then what is the harm? I haven't seen the video, could someone please find it?
KK
Originally posted by: KK
Probably nature.
I would like to see the video of this. If the doctor was making a big scene about the whole burning of this uterus then that'd be alittle different, he needs to act professional. But if it was just to test the instrument then what is the harm? I haven't seen the video, could someone please find it?
KK
there are links to it in that article or from the main wave3.com page
I watched the video... a bit far reaching to claim "testing".
Who cares what he does with the uterus after removal - but to do it before removal, while she's still under. Wrong.
That he videotaped and gave a copy to the patients... he's asking for lawsuits.
Don't overlook the fact that this procedure comes with a change in life perception - lots of emotional issues in the first place. To treat it as inconsequential adds insult to injury.
More power to the plaintiff.
Who cares what he does with the uterus after removal - but to do it before removal, while she's still under. Wrong.
That he videotaped and gave a copy to the patients... he's asking for lawsuits.
Don't overlook the fact that this procedure comes with a change in life perception - lots of emotional issues in the first place. To treat it as inconsequential adds insult to injury.
More power to the plaintiff.
I've made an impression on a few uteruses, but nothing like this....
I worked in surgery for several years, and I've seen some weird things, but I cannot for the life of me think what might have been going through this doctor's head. Although, I think he should be disciplined by his state's medical board and the hospital, I don't think this should be construed as medical malpractice. Having bad taste and malpractice are two different things.
I worked in surgery for several years, and I've seen some weird things, but I cannot for the life of me think what might have been going through this doctor's head. Although, I think he should be disciplined by his state's medical board and the hospital, I don't think this should be construed as medical malpractice. Having bad taste and malpractice are two different things.
Amused
Elite Member
- Apr 14, 2001
- 56,785
- 17,394
- 146
The uterus was coming out anyhow. The woman suffered no physical damage, and admits she is in perfect health. The doctor did his job, and did it well.
If this causes them "emotional damage," they need to sue themselves and their parents for being over-emotional dipsh!ts.
If this causes them "emotional damage," they need to sue themselves and their parents for being over-emotional dipsh!ts.
I could understand if he removed it and then burned UK into it and never showed it to the patient. Why did he think that this woman and her husband would want a copy????
What the big deal?
I remember being under local anesthesia and in surgery while the doctor talked to me and his assisstant about their kids in college etc. He could have been drawing smiley faces all over the part of me he was removing for all I care. All I care is that he does a good job, and that he did.
I remember being under local anesthesia and in surgery while the doctor talked to me and his assisstant about their kids in college etc. He could have been drawing smiley faces all over the part of me he was removing for all I care. All I care is that he does a good job, and that he did.
yeah,
silly doctor. He should have drawn a cardinal and the letters UofL. Stupid hick kentucky fans.
silly doctor. He should have drawn a cardinal and the letters UofL. Stupid hick kentucky fans.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 18K
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter