Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
hey ..u get good money for being in a sh*tty sitcom. beats whatever allowance u probably got. and he survived it.
This relates to the quality of his movies, how?
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
hey ..u get good money for being in a sh*tty sitcom. beats whatever allowance u probably got. and he survived it.
This relates to the quality of his movies, how?
never said it did, just saying is all. plus u derided him for making money as a child when u didn't do any better.. what gives u the right to feel so superior![]()
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
hey ..u get good money for being in a sh*tty sitcom. beats whatever allowance u probably got. and he survived it.
This relates to the quality of his movies, how?
never said it did, just saying is all. plus u derided him for making money as a child when u didn't do any better.. what gives u the right to feel so superior![]()
I gues you're the one doing drugs, cause my original post has nothing to do with his child work. Andy Griffith and Happy Days were pretty terrible shows, though. In fact, I would place them on the same level as his movies.
Originally posted by: Squisher
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
hey ..u get good money for being in a sh*tty sitcom. beats whatever allowance u probably got. and he survived it.
This relates to the quality of his movies, how?
never said it did, just saying is all. plus u derided him for making money as a child when u didn't do any better.. what gives u the right to feel so superior![]()
I gues you're the one doing drugs, cause my original post has nothing to do with his child work. Andy Griffith and Happy Days were pretty terrible shows, though. In fact, I would place them on the same level as his movies.
Happy Days and the Andy Griffith Show were both extremely funny.
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
hey ..u get good money for being in a sh*tty sitcom. beats whatever allowance u probably got. and he survived it.
This relates to the quality of his movies, how?
never said it did, just saying is all. plus u derided him for making money as a child when u didn't do any better.. what gives u the right to feel so superior![]()
I gues you're the one doing drugs, cause my original post has nothing to do with his child work. Andy Griffith and Happy Days were pretty terrible shows, though. In fact, I would place them on the same level as his movies.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
hey ..u get good money for being in a sh*tty sitcom. beats whatever allowance u probably got. and he survived it.
This relates to the quality of his movies, how?
never said it did, just saying is all. plus u derided him for making money as a child when u didn't do any better.. what gives u the right to feel so superior![]()
I gues you're the one doing drugs, cause my original post has nothing to do with his child work. Andy Griffith and Happy Days were pretty terrible shows, though. In fact, I would place them on the same level as his movies.
its irrelevant whether the shows were good. he made good money is the point, so its not all bad. all shows back then were pretty horrid. but his current movies are not as bad as happy days. sorry, if apollo 13 and a beautiful mind are only as good as happy days to you, u have ur head up ur ass
Originally posted by: preslove
He and Ron Howard are the two most over-rated film-makers around today. Their material ranges from mediocre to fvcking terrible, and yet they get awards and props from all kinds of stupid people. The Doors is one of the worst films of all time. Fvck them both.