• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Old NASA Equipment Will Be Visible on the Moon

SirUlli

Senior member
Summary - (Jul 12, 2005) During the Apollo era of spaceflight, many US spacecraft and vehicles were left on the Moon when the astronauts returned home. For the first time in more than 30 years, we'll get a chance to see them again when NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter arrives at the Moon in 2008. It will be equipped with a camera capable of resolving the surface of the Moon down to half a metre (1.6 feet). Some of the larger structures on the Moon are 9 metres (30 feet) across, so they should be easy to spot by the orbiter.
...

and why haven't we photographed them? There are six landing sites scattered across the Moon. They always face Earth, always in plain view. Surely the Hubble Space Telescope could photograph the rovers and other things astronauts left behind. Right?

Wrong. Not even Hubble can do it. The Moon is 384,400 km away. At that distance, the smallest things Hubble can distinguish are about 60 meters wide. The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 9 meters across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image.

Better pictures are coming. In 2008 NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will carry a powerful modern camera into low orbit over the Moon's surface. Its primary mission is not to photograph old Apollo landing sites, but it will photograph them, many times, providing the first recognizable images of Apollo relics since 1972.

The spacecraft's high-resolution camera, called "LROC," short for Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, has a resolution of about half a meter. That means that a half-meter square on the Moon's surface would fill a single pixel in its digital images.

Apollo moon buggies are about 2 meters wide and 3 meters long. So in the LROC images, those abandoned vehicles will fill about 4 by 6 pixels.

What does a half-meter resolution picture look like? This image of an airport on Earth has the same resolution as an LROC image. Moon buggy-sized objects (automobiles and luggage carts) are clear:

"I would say the rovers will look angular and distinct," says Mark Robinson, research associate professor at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, and Principal Investigator for LROC. "We might see some shading differences on top from seats, depending on the sun angle. Even the rovers' tracks might be detectable in some instances."

Even more recognizable will be the discarded lander platforms. Their main bodies are 4 meters on a side, and so will fill an 8 by 8 pixel square in the LROC images. The four legs jutting out from the platforms' four corners span a diameter of 9 meters. So, from landing pad to landing pad, the landers will occupy about 18 pixels in LROC images, more than enough to trace their distinctive shapes.
...
Full Story

http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/abandoned_spaceships_lroc.html?1272005

and also

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/11jul_lroc.htm

that will anythink clear out

Sir Ulli
 
Nice find SirUlli !!

Maybe this will prove that they actually landed there and it wasn't faked, as some people believe.
 
Oh, I'm sure they already done flown up some old studio props they used when they faked them moon landings back in the '60's and crashed 'em on the moon's surface just so they can photograph 'em with this lunar recognizersance camera doo-dad. They're just tryin' to cover their collective behinds!

Besides, how do we know they won't be faking this whole LROC thingy to begin with? Hmmmmm? Listen, if they faked them moon landings, I'm sure they can fake this stuff, too!

See, you gotta git yer butt outta bed perdy early to fool ol' OD!

😉🙂😀
 
Originally posted by: OhioDude
Oh, I'm sure they already done flown up some old studio props they used when they faked them moon landings back in the '60's and crashed 'em on the moon's surface just so they can photograph 'em with this lunar recognizersance camera doo-dad. They're just tryin' to cover their collective behinds!

Besides, how do we know they won't be faking this whole LROC thingy to begin with? Hmmmmm? Listen, if they faked them moon landings, I'm sure they can fake this stuff, too!

See, you gotta git yer butt outta bed perdy early to fool ol' OD!

😉🙂😀

Are you sure about that? Are we sure you are really you and can you prove it?
 
Originally posted by: NokiaDude
Wait, so the Hubble can see lightyears into space but it can't make out rovers on the moon?

Yep
I also read it was never made to image objects so close(relatively) so it's optics & focusing mechanisms work better for far away objects.
And the surface of the Earth or Moon seem to spin by so fast you get kind of a blurry picture. Hubble can't track an object that fast.
 
Back
Top