Oklahoma Supreme Court orders Ten Commandments removed from Capitol

[xBiffx]

Umm... you've read the 10 commandments and you're aware of their history, right?

Yeah, but I'm not aware how that benefits a religion. Was their history on display?

 

[fskimospy]

Yeah, but I'm not aware how that benefits a religion. Was their history on display?

They are part of the foundational texts of several major religions. Displaying them on government property serves as a de facto endorsement of that religion.

Come on, this isn't complicated.

 

[JD50]

Yeah, but I'm not aware how that benefits a religion. Was their history on display?

Was their history on display? What does that even mean and how is that relevant? It's a religious symbol.

It amazes me that people criticizing the placement of these sensible rules in a government location seem to have never read them. It's not like they include "Though shalt have no other gods before me", prohibitions on idols or graven images or using the name of the deity in an unholy context, specifications about setting aside day(s) for worship, and so on.

There is nothing religious about them.

xBiffX, you don't see a problem with that?

 

[xBiffx]

They are part of the foundational texts of several major religions. Displaying them on government property serves as a de facto endorsement of that religion.

Come on, this isn't complicated.

So again, how does this benefit a religion. More broadly, how does this benefit only religion? Even more broadly, what is this benefit and why is it not allowed?

 

[Atomic Playboy]

So again, how does this benefit a religion. More broadly, how does this benefit only religion? Even more broadly, what is this benefit and why is it not allowed?

It's endorsement of a particular religion or religions which prominently feature the 10 Commandments (Judeo-Christian religions). It's not the state's place to endorse ANY religion. Prominent portrayal of religious texts on state grounds amounts to free advertising, and it's seen as the state legitimizing one religion over others.

 

[fskimospy]

So again, how does this benefit a religion. More broadly, how does this benefit only religion? Even more broadly, what is this benefit?

You're asking how the government endorsing a religion (or religions) benefits them? Isn't that obvious? Even though it probably only benefits religion, whether or not it only benefits religion is not relevant, as it would still be illegal even if it had some other purpose.

As to what that benefit is, I will quote Sandra Day O'Connor:

Endorsement sends a message to nonadherents that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community.

 

[brycejones]

JHC on a stick, Texashiker is off doing tug jobs so xBiffx feels the need to step in and play his role.

 

[JSt0rm]

the righty bubble had a bad week. They all need therapy badly after that but instead they will double down.

 

[xBiffx]

It's endorsement of a particular religion or religions which prominently feature the 10 Commandments (Judeo-Christian religions). It's not the state's place to endorse ANY religion. Prominent portrayal of religious texts on state grounds amounts to free advertising, and it's seen as the state legitimizing one religion over others.

You're asking how the government endorsing a religion (or religions) benefits them? Isn't that obvious? Even though it probably only benefits religion, whether or not it only benefits religion is not relevant, as it would still be illegal even if it had some other purpose.

As to what that benefit is, I will quote Sandra Day O'Connor:

Where is this endorsement you speak of? I don't see anything on that statue that claims one religion or a set of religions is better or worse than any other.

Are no smoking signs an endorsement for tobacco companies simply because they mention their product?

 

[JSt0rm]

Where is this endorsement you speak of? I don't see anything on that statue that claims one religion or a set of religions is better or worse than any other.

Are no smoking signs an endorsement for tobacco companies?

Stop trying to be cute. Do you really have time for such nonsense?

 

[nickqt]

So again, how does this benefit a religion. More broadly, how does this benefit only religion? Even more broadly, what is this benefit and why is it not allowed?

Well, the state capitol is a place of secular law making. So, how does the Ten Commandments benefit secular law?

Let's look specifically at the Oklahoma monument.

"I am the Lord thy God". - doesn't benefit secular law making.

1: "Thou shalt have no other Gods before me". doesn't benefit secular law making. This does allow me to worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster, as long as I worship his noodly appendage after God.

2. "Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images"...too late, because this whole monument is a graven image. Oh, and doesn't benefit secular law making.

3. "Thou shalt not take the name of the lord thy God in vein." Hey, look! another pointless writing that doesn't benefit secular law making.

4. "Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy". Irreleveant to secular law making. Anyone else notice a theme developing?

5. "Honor they father and thy mother that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. Irrelevant.

6. "Thou shalt not kill". Well, yeah. Here we go! Of course, I'm assuming that Oklahoma already has this law on the books. Redundant - not needed.

7. "Thou shalt not commit adultery". Maybe that's on the books in Oklahoma, but I doubt it. Irrelevant.

8. "Thou shalt not steal". Here's the second relevant law, but again, it's already on the books somewhere. Redundant - not needed.

9. "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor". It's only a crime when you lie to the gub'mint, and it's on the books. Half relevant, totally redundant.

10. Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's house, wife, manservant, maidservant, cattle, or anything". I hope this isn't on the books in Oklahoma. Irrelevant.


So, these 10 commandments serve what purpose being located on state capitol property? Oh, none. They serve zero purpose. Anything listed on that piece of rock that is relevant is already a law. At best, its redundant for 2-3 laws. For the other 7, it's irrelevant.

 

[xBiffx]

the righty bubble had a bad week. They all need therapy badly after that but instead they will double down.

Unlike yourself who requires therapy all the time.

 

[GagHalfrunt]

I would have happily donated towards the cost of a monument to my Noodly Master.


Gotta give the Oklahoma Supreme Court some credit, it's rare to see intelligent decisions come out of that area of the country when religion is involved.

 

[fskimospy]

So again, how does this benefit a religion. More broadly, how does this benefit only religion? Even more broadly, what is this benefit and why is it not allowed?

Oh, and if you happen to want a more thorough discussion about displaying the ten commandments on public grounds here you go:

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/545/844.html

 

[xBiffx]

So, how does the Ten Commandments benefit secular law?

Many laws have their roots in those Commandments or at least the principles around them. I'm fairly certain this is why they were even placed there to begin with. Not to promote some religion over the other. But hey, the ACLU got work to do. Who am I to get in the way of progress.

 

[nickqt]

Many laws have their roots in those Commandments or at least the principles around them. I'm fairly certain this is why they were even placed there to begin with. Not to promote some religion over the other.

As in many, you mean 2-3. And they're already on the books, so why the need for a stone monument that has 7 absolutely irrelevant laws that are not on the books?

 

[fskimospy]

Where is this endorsement you speak of? I don't see anything on that statue that claims one religion or a set of religions is better or worse than any other.

Are no smoking signs an endorsement for tobacco companies simply because they mention their product?

You can't seriously be arguing this nonsense. Read the SCOTUS opinion that I linked if you want to know how it's an endorsement.

Who knew that when people put a "Barack Obama" sign in their front yard that they aren't endorsing him? They just happen to be mentioning that someone named Barack Obama exists. hahaha.

 

[JD50]

Many laws have their roots in those Commandments or at least the principles around them. I'm fairly certain this is why they were even placed there to begin with. Not to promote some religion over the other. But hey, the ACLU got work to do. Who am I to get in the way of progress.

It doesn't matter why they were placed there.

 

[JSt0rm]

in my religion we think Christianity itself is a trick of the devil. People are allowed to sin in this religion and be forgiven later on. This perpetuates sin. I want this placed on a rock next to the 10 commandments.

 

[xBiffx]

You can't seriously be arguing this nonsense. Read the SCOTUS opinion that I linked if you want to know how it's an endorsement.

Who knew that when people put a "Barack Obama" sign in their front yard that they aren't endorsing him? They just happen to be mentioning that someone named Barack Obama exists. hahaha.

Let me know when the sign in question says Catholic, Jewish, or any other religion that this sign supposedly endorses.

Again, I guess the no smoking sign can be seen as an endorsement for Philip Morris now.

 

[JSt0rm]

Unlike yourself who requires therapy all the time.

You say that like its a bad thing to seek help? You are one fucked up homo

























sapien

 

[fskimospy]

Let me know when the sign in question says Catholic, Jewish, or any other religion that this sign supposedly endorses.

Again, I guess the no smoking sign can be seen as an endorsement for Philip Morris now.

Seriously, I already linked you a SCOTUS opinion on exactly this topic. Are you being deliberately obtuse?

It is an endorsement of abrahamic religions and therefore unconstitutional. If you have any further questions as to how exactly I have provided you with the controlling legal opinion on the matter.

By the way a no smoking sign is a sign of disapproval by governments, and could certainly be taken as such. Disapproving or endorsing smoking is not unconstitutional like this is though.

 

[Atomic Playboy]

I feel like the sheer energy required to have a thought would knock xBiffx unconscious.

 

[K1052]

Many laws have their roots in those Commandments or at least the principles around them. I'm fairly certain this is why they were even placed there to begin with. Not to promote some religion over the other. But hey, the ACLU got work to do. Who am I to get in the way of progress.

Beyond the not stealing and not killing lets hear some more examples to support you claim.

 

[JSt0rm]

Beyond the not stealing and not killing lets hear some more examples to support you claim.

but seriously dont fuck your neighbors wife. That one is pretty good.