OJ Simpson is getting VIOLENT again!!!!

radiocore

Golden Member
Aug 25, 2000
1,011
1
0
hmm...doesn't sound that bad to me <shrugs> lets see when we get more info on the story :cool:
 

PCAddict

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 1999
3,804
0
0
I agree, I'd like to hear more about it. The guy in the other car could have been f*#$ing with OJ or something. Believe me, I am NOT defending OJ. He is guilty. Even if he didn't do the deed himself, he was involved in carrying out those murders in some way.

 

gittyup

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 2000
5,036
0
0
With a temper like his, it is only a matter of time for him to go off the edge again! :frown:
 

fdiskboy

Golden Member
Sep 21, 2000
1,328
0
0
I think he did it (the double murders). He'll pay someday. Everyone gets what is coming to them eventually.
 

yakko

Lifer
Apr 18, 2000
25,455
2
0
I bet the other guy did a hell of a lot more than &quot;flick his lights&quot; at OJ. Since OJ only has one incedent of violence where he hit his ex-wife I don't really think something that small would set him off.
 

Optimus

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2000
3,618
0
0
OJ is innocent of this one too! To convict him, you'd have to ignore all the Simpson DNA evidence... and that would be downright nutty.

Also, OJ wasn't there - he was ninja-fighting some informants (who had turned violent during questioning) downtown while on the trail of his wife's real killer.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,169
1,812
126


<< Since OJ only has one incedent of violence where he hit his ex-wife I don't really think something that small would set him off. >>

That has to be the strangest statement I've read all day. I hope you're being sarcastic.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Perhaps OJ thought the guy flashing his lights was one of the &quot;real killers,&quot; whom he has been so diligent in flushing out for the past 4 years.
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
yakko: It's strange because OJ is a murderer. If you doubt that, then you might possibly want to check into psychiatric help because you are obviously delusional.
 

Optimus

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2000
3,618
0
0
Yakko - I think it goes:

If OJ will commit violence against his wife, then OJ is likely to commit violence against others too.
 

axelfox

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
6,719
1
0
OJ is innocent of this one too! To convict him, you'd have to ignore all the Simpson DNA evidence... and that would be downright nutty.

LOL
 

Yo Ma Ma

Lifer
Jan 21, 2000
11,635
2
0
If the light was flicked then you must convict :p

Seriously, OJ is walking scum. He probably thinks he can walk on water and get away with it now, hopefully that mentality will be his undoing one day.
 

yakko

Lifer
Apr 18, 2000
25,455
2
0


<< It's strange because OJ is a murderer. >>



So the fact that Ron Goldman was known to rip off drug dealers that he dealt with couldn't possibly have contributed to his demise. Oh that's right drug dealers never retaliate they are too nice for that. Why don't you people look at all the facts about all the people involved and not just one person? The way in which they were killed is exactly the type of thing that drug dealers do when you piss them off repeatedly.



<< If OJ will commit violence against his wife, then OJ is likely to commit violence against others too. >>


Have you ever commited violence against anyone? If you answer yes that means if anyone around you says you did it then you must have because you commited violence before no matter what any of the evidence says. There would not even need to be a trial to prove you guilty because you obviously are.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,169
1,812
126


<< << If OJ will commit violence against his wife, then OJ is likely to commit violence against others too. >>

Have you ever commited violence against anyone? If you answer yes that means if anyone around you says you did it then you must have because you commited violence before no matter what any of the evidence says. There would not even need to be a trial to prove you guilty because you obviously are.
>>



Uhhh... I was just shocked that you consider OJ hitting his ex-wife not to be a big deal. If I saw any one of my long-time friends beating his wife, I'd report him to the police immediately, and I would testify against him in court. That kind of behaviour is completely unacceptable.

 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
What Eug just said!

Anyway, this thread wasn't intended of a debate about OJ's innocense. As far as I'm concerned (as far as any sane individual is concerned - no offense intended hehe) OJ is as guilty as sin; he was let off because of planting of evidence and various other &quot;reasonable doubt&quot; conflicts. But just because some evidence was planted and the cops were overzealous in the matter doesn't change the fact this piece of garbage is driving around after the murder of two innocent people.

My only wish is that one day him and Tyson manage to headon collision each other and they both die on the spot.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Yakko:

You may be insane. I would suggest a full psychological workup if you seriously think OJ is not guilty. Were you on the jury by any chance?
 

yakko

Lifer
Apr 18, 2000
25,455
2
0
I don't think he is guilty or innocent. I do not have enough facts to prove it either way. Considering the lifestyle that Ron Goldman led I would not rule out it being people he pissed off. I wasn't there so I don't know. Since you were obviously there to see it all to know that he is so guilty why didn't you stop the crime? None of us here has enough evidence to convict him so none of us should be saying he's guilty. I hope you guys are never on a jury if something happens to me.

As for hitting his wife it happened one time and in the same situation I might have hit her too. He didn't beat her he hit her. Big difference. I bet you guys don't even know what the situation was when he did hit her do you?
 

PCAddict

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 1999
3,804
0
0
Was it when he saw her through the window, umm... giving something to another guy?