I've noticed that Honda and Toyota's OEM oil filters have low rated filtering efficiency compared to some of the aftermarket options.
For example, the well-regarded Honda A01 (made by Filtech) is only rated for ~65% efficiency at 20 microns. Toyota's OEM filters have a similarly low rated efficiency. A PureOne is rated for 99.9% efficiency at 20 microns.
In the case of the Honda A01, it also has 40% more filter media than a PureOne (151 vs 108 square inches). So it would seem like Honda is going for a high flow rate with that much filter media + a low restriction, less efficient media.
Which brings me to the question...is using a high-efficiency (more restrictive) filter like a PureOne really a good idea when the OEM filters are mostly designed to favor higher flow?
For example, the well-regarded Honda A01 (made by Filtech) is only rated for ~65% efficiency at 20 microns. Toyota's OEM filters have a similarly low rated efficiency. A PureOne is rated for 99.9% efficiency at 20 microns.
In the case of the Honda A01, it also has 40% more filter media than a PureOne (151 vs 108 square inches). So it would seem like Honda is going for a high flow rate with that much filter media + a low restriction, less efficient media.
Which brings me to the question...is using a high-efficiency (more restrictive) filter like a PureOne really a good idea when the OEM filters are mostly designed to favor higher flow?
Last edited: