Ohio vote official

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
The final tally does not become official until the EC votes.

Up until them, anybody could change their vote.

If it is felt that the vote is incorrect, then apply pressure to the EC.
 

MidasKnight

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2004
3,288
0
76
A recount will not change the outcome. But since it's officially counted now then those that want to pay the State of Ohio $$ for a recount will just go ahead. That's ok by me.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Kerry lost. Get over it.

You know, the people *I* see having trouble "getting over it" are Bush voters...hmm.


Or they are complaining about the Kerry die-hards not willing to accept that their man was not as good as professed to be.

As long as the neo-Dems continue to cry foul and conspiracy, then the Bush supporters will defend their man.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Kerry lost. Get over it.

You know, the people *I* see having trouble "getting over it" are Bush voters...hmm.


Or they are complaining about the Kerry die-hards not willing to accept that their man was not as good as professed to be.

As long as the neo-Dems continue to cry foul and conspiracy, then the Bush supporters will defend their man.

Well, you have a point, but it's a Chicken and Egg problem. Who's going to stop first?

And I would also like to point out that for a while here on P&amp;N, every other thread was a Bushie predicting the liberalism will die or how having the majority on your side makes you right (come again?). Of course, in the interests of fairness, the other half of the threads were Kerry die-hards saying the election was stolen or that a little over half the country is stupid hicks ;)

Maybe we ALL need to get over it, eh?
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Kerry lost. Get over it.

You know, the people *I* see having trouble "getting over it" are Bush voters...hmm.


Or they are complaining about the Kerry die-hards not willing to accept that their man was not as good as professed to be.

As long as the neo-Dems continue to cry foul and conspiracy, then the Bush supporters will defend their man.

Well, you have a point, but it's a Chicken and Egg problem. Who's going to stop first?

And I would also like to point out that for a while here on P&amp;N, every other thread was a Bushie predicting the liberalism will die or how having the majority on your side makes you right (come again?). Of course, in the interests of fairness, the other half of the threads were Kerry die-hards saying the election was stolen or that a little over half the country is stupid hicks ;)

Maybe we ALL need to get over it, eh?

Most would like to get over it; There are a few who seem to troll the issue that will not get over it. And they generate a rise from a die-hard on the other side of the spectrum. Probably that is what the intent of the post is.

At this point, most (not all) thread posts seem to be started from those that feel they were wronged.

Hopefully after Jan, those trolling type of threads will die out.

 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
I don't think it is a die-hard thing like people can not accept losing as it is a "He better not have pulled a fast-one again."
Being SURE is a good thing for Democracy no matter how much bushies want to just whine about "getting over it"
I am curious how the right-wingnuts would react to the very suspicious voter stuff if Kerry won.
Those people would pour MILLIONS into getting recount after recount, or more likely, just assasinate him in the time-honored tradition of the right-wingnuts.
Where's our Ukraine? :|
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
I don't think it is a die-hard thing it is a "He better not have pulled a fast-one again."
Being SURE is a good thing for Democracy no matter how much bushies want to just whine about "getting over it"
I am curious how the right-wingnuts would react to the very suspicious voter stuff if Kerry won.
Those people would pour MILLIONS into getting recount after recount, or more likely, just assasinate him in the time-honored tradition of the right-wingnuts.

There is difference between wanting to be sure, and bitching about how you were wronged before the facts were even on the table.

I'm all for making sure things turned out the way they were supposed to. I can't see why anyone would oppose being 100% just because their guy won. If Kerry had won and there were accusations and questions, I'd want them answered if only so people would shut up about it.

Really that's what it will take for people to "get over it". Hot air now is one thing, but hot air after several months of looking into things and recounts is something else.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
nah, that sonofabitch stole it again. until I see proof -it stinks the whole media playing down the vote fraud stuff and trying to get eveyone to hold hands is not going to silence those who think this whole thing stinks after the sham to democracy of the last one yeah right everyone is just going to go turn their eyes and pretend it couldn't happen again. (like he wouldn't? haha if you think so you need to turn the idiot box off)
They are afraid of what would happen. There have been millions of protesters and bush can't even go out in public without geting a oath. That is a very paranoid man and if I was him I would be too.
IF (and if he did win I am fine with the next four years.) he did screw around again there gonna have to rename texas "Little Ukraine" baby!
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Kerry lost. Get over it.

You know, the people *I* see having trouble "getting over it" are Bush voters...hmm.


LOL, they can be recounted till everyone's eyes bleed for all I care.

Hell, I'll even contribute $ so the votes can be recounted a 3rd time:thumbsup:
 

bigj3347

Senior member
Sep 19, 2004
458
0
0
No matter what Bush supporters say, nothing will convince the Democrats that Bush won the election fair and square. Did it ever occur to any of you Democrats that Kerry never once took a stand on any issue?? All he ever said was vague campaign rhetoric in his futlie attempts to cover up his Senate voting record. Even though you might disagree with Bush, you knew where he stood. He was always against gay marriage, abortion, and all for whatever it takes in the war on terror. Kerry even had the audacity to put a time table on the war on terror. Democrats have nobody to blame but themselves for losing this very winnable election. I'm a moderate, and I would've voted for Wesley Clark over Bush. I would've even voted for Howard Dean over Bush. At least Dean knew where he stood on issues important to the voters. Like Bush, Dean didn't try to appease everyone and end up not satisfying anyone. That PR picture of Kerry in his hunting outfit is downright hilarious.
Kerry's laughable attempt to appeal to southern voters.

Like I said before, grow up and stop blaming Bush for your own parties inability to nominate a suitable presidential candidate.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
Topic Title: Ohio vote official
Topic Summary: Kerry lost. Get over it.

Get over it? Who in here said that Ohio didn't lose out to the Radical Religious Right??? :confused:

Ohio sucks A$$ along with the rest of the Red States.

I dunno DM Ohio may have had a half brain-dead population but there were MANY peeps who were working hard fighting the good fight. We don't even know if OH is legit yet. (If we will ever) Just 'cause the state has more republicans does not mean the whole state is fuxx0red. For real CA had a lot of Bush votes doesen't mean I am calling myself names. Props for all the blue voters everywhere. That is pretty sucky to write off half (possibly more) of every state (except utah those religious cultists can kiss my bootay -and their angel of moron-I too.)
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
" No matter what Bush supporters say, nothing will convince the Democrats that Bush won the election fair and square. "

I'm a Democrat and I don't know what you are talking about.

 

bigj3347

Senior member
Sep 19, 2004
458
0
0
I'm sorry but wikipedia isn't exactly a credible source, anybody can add stuff to wikipedia. Note how all the sources are from liberal organizations who publish left wing conspiracy theories with out any factual information. The article you linked is even being voted on for deletion. You guys can bitch about it all you want, but it's not gonna put Kerry in to the white house. Thank God.
 

wchou

Banned
Dec 1, 2004
1,137
0
0
Originally posted by: Tom
" No matter what Bush supporters say, nothing will convince the Democrats that Bush won the election fair and square. "

I'm a Democrat and I don't know what you are talking about.

lmao... whats up chap? cha? oh god, there is nothing fair about a rigged election. There is no honesty when it comes to $$$ used to help him win rather then by voters. Only an idiot buried in quick sand would believe anything.
so i'd have to agree with you, i do not kinow whats he talking about either. just spewing crap i guess. :roll: