Oh, so that's why my computer is as responsive as a boat anchor

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Text

You'd think that, after having it present since v1.2.something, they would've fixed this peg-the-CPU-and-eat-the-RAM issue. But they're content to pretend it doesn't exist.

Edit: The SS doesn't show the 99% CPU usage, which is periodic, and for whatever reason, hits both cores.
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Firefox eating 152,408 KB over here, with 7 Amazon and 2 ATOT tabs open. Seems like alot to me.

Oh, FFS, Ctrl+E jusched.exe, acrotray.exe, msmsgs.exe and qttask.exe.
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Oh, FFS, Ctrl+E jusched.exe, acrotray.exe, msmsgs.exe and qttask.exe.

:confused: nitpicking for less than a meg and next to ZERO CPU time, when some lazy opensores developer is content to just randomly grab a gig and a half to render ONE tab?

 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!

so close it. big whoop.
 

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,108
5
81
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!
Agreed, they won't admit to the issue either.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!

so close it. big whoop.

That's all well and good if you're average joe who browses the internet. But there are cases where a web browser has a damn good reason to be left open - kiosks, administrative applications, web app consoles.

I've actually steered a project in development away from using Firefox in favor of IE because of this very bug - the application requires 100% uptime - having a tech reboot the machine daily because it's out of RAM isn't an acceptable state.
 

GeekDrew

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
9,099
19
81
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!

so close it. big whoop.

That's all well and good if you're average joe who browses the internet. But there are cases where a web browser has a damn good reason to be left open - kiosks, administrative applications, web app consoles.

I've actually steered a project in development away from using Firefox in favor of IE because of this very bug - the application requires 100% uptime - having a tech reboot the machine daily because it's out of RAM isn't an acceptable state.

I know that there are issues with Firefox, and it's far from perfect... but what *exactly* are you doing, other than just leaving it open, to cause it to use so much RAM? I've intentionally left a browser window open for 2 solid weeks, and it was still under 100 MB used.
 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
Just opened 10 tabs to different websites. 91MB. FF 1.5.06. I got lots of RAM to spare out of the 1GB.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!

so close it. big whoop.

That's all well and good if you're average joe who browses the internet. But there are cases where a web browser has a damn good reason to be left op ( n - kiosks, administrative applications, web app consoles.

I've actually steered a project in development away from using Firefox in favor of IE because of this very bug - the application requires 100% uptime - having a tech reboot the machine daily because it's out of RAM isn't an acceptable state.

I know that there are issues with Firefox, and it's far from perfect... but what *exactly* are you doing, other than just leaving it open, to cause it to use so much RAM? I've intentionally left a browser window open for 2 solid weeks, and it was still under 100 MB used.

Leaving it open. And that's it. Not everyone encounters the issue - but for those who do, it persists. It seems to happen much more frequently on computers with large amounts of RAM (>1gb)
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,449
126
I've been having problems with the newer builds of Firefox causing my hard drive to go nuts for a minute or two while it's clearing out my cache after I start it every day. I was able to fix that by decreasing my cache size from 50 MB to 5 MB, though. It's still annoying, though, and I've never had that problem while using IE.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: LoKe
Turn the tweak on for trim.on.minimize. It'll dump the usage whever you...minimize.

Tried it before - it doesn't.

Amusingly, there seems to be something about ATOT causing it to eat 1.5gb. Because I just restarted the browser SEVERAL times, and it's still sucking down all that RAM.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: EyeMWing

Amusingly, there seems to be something about ATOT causing it to eat 1.5gb. Because I just restarted the browser SEVERAL times, and it's still sucking down all that RAM.

Must be that Crucial Ad making FF suck all the memory so people buy more memory! :p
 

iRONic

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2006
7,666
2,968
136
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Text

You'd think that, after having it present since v1.2.something, they would've fixed this peg-the-CPU-and-eat-the-RAM issue. But they're content to pretend it doesn't exist.

Edit: The SS doesn't show the 99% CPU usage, which is periodic, and for whatever reason, hits both cores.

Borked extensions?
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
The trim works well for me, I'm one of the 100MB after 10 minutes open with 3 tabs crowd and this tweak makes it go down to 3MB when it's minimized.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: iRONic
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Text

You'd think that, after having it present since v1.2.something, they would've fixed this peg-the-CPU-and-eat-the-RAM issue. But they're content to pretend it doesn't exist.

Edit: The SS doesn't show the 99% CPU usage, which is periodic, and for whatever reason, hits both cores.

Borked extensions?

That would be difficult, as I have NONE installed.
 

potato28

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
8,964
0
0
Ohhh the how high can we get the mem usage game? And FYI, the new update is causing this. 1.5.0.6 is coming out in a few days anyways...
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
I posted this a few months ago.

Text

And I've only seen similar/better performance since then. What are you guys doing to your poor FF installations?
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: potato28
Ohhh the how high can we get the mem usage game? And FYI, the new update is causing this. 1.5.0.6 is coming out in a few days anyways...

Actually, just for shits and giggles, I just installed the new update. Or tried to. FF now crashes on load with the error "ZOMG I CAN'T INSTALL THE UPDATE" and retries until you kill the process.

Now posting from IE6.
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: potato28
Ohhh the how high can we get the mem usage game? And FYI, the new update is causing this. 1.5.0.6 is coming out in a few days anyways...

Actually, just for shits and giggles, I just installed the new update. Or tried to. FF now crashes on load with the error "ZOMG I CAN'T INSTALL THE UPDATE" and retries until you kill the process.

Now posting from IE6.

:confused:
 

GeekDrew

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
9,099
19
81
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: sniperruff
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: Raduque
I've seen firefox climb over 300mb, but the 2.0 Beta1 hasn't gone over 190mb. But 1.3gb! :shocked: How many tabs do you have open, 70?

One. It's a bug. A huge, glaring bug that's been there since I started using the damned app. Let it sit for a few days, and it'll steal your megabytes!

so close it. big whoop.

That's all well and good if you're average joe who browses the internet. But there are cases where a web browser has a damn good reason to be left op ( n - kiosks, administrative applications, web app consoles.

I've actually steered a project in development away from using Firefox in favor of IE because of this very bug - the application requires 100% uptime - having a tech reboot the machine daily because it's out of RAM isn't an acceptable state.

I know that there are issues with Firefox, and it's far from perfect... but what *exactly* are you doing, other than just leaving it open, to cause it to use so much RAM? I've intentionally left a browser window open for 2 solid weeks, and it was still under 100 MB used.

Leaving it open. And that's it. Not everyone encounters the issue - but for those who do, it persists. It seems to happen much more frequently on computers with large amounts of RAM (>1gb)

I've used Firefox extensively on machines w/ 512MB, 1GB, 1.5GB, and 2GB of RAM. None of them have exhibited the problem. :confused: