OH MY! The Canon EFS 18-55 IS lens is HELLA sharp!!!!!

Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
I got it today and I must say its a far cry from the old 18-55 kit lens. This thing is on a league of its own for its price and performance. The spec sheet saying 4 stop improvement, well I have to agree with it. I shot upto 1/4 second with no shake and .3" with a minute shake. I am impressed.

The lens is relatively fast, for what i tested it with. But what impresses me most is the sharpness and IQ of the pictures. I think i just found my next best lens besides the nifty fifty.

I have to agree with photozone's review. I had to do a double take just to make sure these pictures were coming out of this lens.

TGG
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
It's not bad, but bah to rotating front elements, CPLs are so useful and nifty ;)

Photozone's conclusion in full:

Verdict

There were a few moments when I considered not to publish the results due to "political correctness" because to date it was a quite absurd thought that such a cheap, or better "affordable", lens can perform this good and I'm sure that some will not believe the findings even though they're supported by the published field images. Anyway, the resolution capabilities of the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS is nothing short of amazing. This is also surprising regarding the rather small changes in the optical design compared to the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II. Still - the center resolution is excellent throughout the range even at wide-open aperture. Unlike most dedicated APS-C standard zoom lenses it is capable to keep a very good level even at the extreme corners of the image field. Its resolution characteristic is similar to the (much higher priced) EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS at comparable aperture settings, quite a bit better than the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 USM IS and naturally vastly improved over its non-IS predecessor! Field curvature is not an issue. So is it a perfect lens then ? No, naturally not. It has its weaknesses - notably strong barrel distortions at 18mm and very high vignetting at 18mm @ f/3.5. Chromatic aberrations are well controlled at the extreme ends of the zoom range but quite pronounced around 28mm. In the field the lens struggles in contra light situations whereas the bokeh (out-of-focus blur) is pretty good within the limits of its depth-of-field capabilities. All-in-all the optical aspects are impressive and that's not only regarding the low price tag. The image stabilizer is quite efficient with a real world "gain" equivalent to about 3 f-stops. On the mechanical side things aren't so rosy. Canon changed the cosmetics of the lens and it certainly "looks" better now but the actual implementation has only been marginally improved compared to the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II. The plastic quality (down to the lens mount) spoils subjective quality perception quite a bit. The inner lens tube does still wobble significantly and accurate manual focusing remains next to impossible. However, the AF speed and accuracy is very decent and that's probably good enough for most users anyway. The Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS is certainly a value king, priced below 200?/US$, which is a good match for the resolution potential of the current generation of Canon's APS-C DSLRs.
 

OdiN

Banned
Mar 1, 2000
16,430
3
0
No USM focusing = I won't own it.

I had a kit lens long ago when I first got my 20D. I hated it because manual focus with it was nearly impossible to get any sort of critical focus. The focusing element moved too easily.
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Originally posted by: OdiN
No USM focusing = I won't own it.

I had a kit lens long ago when I first got my 20D. I hated it because manual focus with it was nearly impossible to get any sort of critical focus. The focusing element moved too easily.

as long as it's no worse than the nifty 50, it's under $200, and probably even less once it trickles to the used market. But then again, I'm looking at this lens to fill a small gap for myself, not a main lens.
 
Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
I took some pictures but i cannot find my transfer cable (any one from the 4 canon cameras i own).. or the USB card reader.. i'll check this evening again.
 

jamesbond007

Diamond Member
Dec 21, 2000
5,280
0
71

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: kalster
how does it perform wide open, any pics of the lens wide open

I would have thought that the last one at least was wide open, and maybe even the one above, it is a kit lens ;)
 
Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
There is a picture (3rd from bottom) that is at wide. There is a bit of CA in that picture (top of the fountain) but I noticed its because its the focus point was not on that. There is a lot of detail in there..

If you cant see the picture, copy and paste or drag and drop.
 

kalster

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
7,355
6
81
seems much better than the canon original kit lens, which is a pretty poor lens, the 3-4 stop IS is good too, I guess unless you need the reach the 17-85 is pretty much useless at this point (and at that price the tamron 28-75 is a better option, with the loss of wide angle) at 2-3 times the cost of the new kit lens
 
Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
I do believe it is MUCH better than the standard KIT lens. It is a lot sharper and the focusing is better and better bokeh too!

 

jamesbond007

Diamond Member
Dec 21, 2000
5,280
0
71
Originally posted by: TheGoodGuy
I do believe it is MUCH better than the standard KIT lens. It is a lot sharper and the focusing is better and better bokeh too!

I finally got the pictures to work and I'd have to say the only one that has any 'sharpness' is the one with the fountain. Not to rain on your parade, but I'd rather see someone buy a different lens.

EDIT: Please watch your exposures, too; particularly the one with the flower.
 
Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
Originally posted by: jamesbond007
Originally posted by: TheGoodGuy
I do believe it is MUCH better than the standard KIT lens. It is a lot sharper and the focusing is better and better bokeh too!

I finally got the pictures to work and I'd have to say the only one that has any 'sharpness' is the one with the fountain. Not to rain on your parade, but I'd rather see someone buy a different lens.

EDIT: Please watch your exposures, too; particularly the one with the flower.

I'll take more pictures when the weather clears up. I really do believe its better than the old 18-55 kit lens.
 

imported_ThinkPad

Junior Member
Jan 23, 2008
21
0
0
I have this lens for my 20D as well. It's a really good lens for the price you pay.

If it hasn't been mentioned yet, this is the new kit lens for the newly released Canon Rebel XSi.