- Feb 1, 2008
- 11,265
- 2,972
- 136
"Parents rights bill" introduced in the Iowa Senate
Debated topic?
Only because a few radical homophobic, racist mothers made this into a "debated topic".
Oh... Great...
Now we'll see just how many new teachers this will attract into teaching.
And, how many of the current teachers will remain in teaching.
And so.... You have a parent of a gay kid vs the anti-gay homophobic racist religious fundamentalist parent. One opposes the teachers lesson of the day, the other does not. Which parent do you think will win out? And, what further laws and constraints will that anti-gay homophobic racist religious fundamentalist parent deem necessary to impose next? Heinrich Himmler in every class with a whip?
Commentary:
You know.... any parent who wishes to do so can simply "sit-in" on a class, as an observer. So WHY do we need more laws just because of some homophobe anti-gay racist religious fundamentalist parent? Why would that homophobe anti-gay racist religious fundamentalist parent want to run to their state legislature instead of simply sitting-in on a class. Even just one class might be nice.
Who do these anti-gay racist religious fundamentalist parents think are teaching their kids in the first place? Some hairy naked guy wearing a leather jockstrap?
I thought that republicans, and iOwa is a republican controlled state, but I thought republicans were for fewer laws and constraints, not more. And for more freedoms?
I swear, someone has figured out a way to clone Adolf Hitler from his ashes, duplicating the process several times over, then installing as republican governors across the country. And, in republican state legislatures.
We haven't seen this nonsense since Nazi Germany back in 1938, and that WAS only in Nazi Germany.
Parents.... banning books, deciding which books people can and can not read, telling the teacher what they can and can not teach, and parent approval of every subject matter to be taught by a teacher.
And how does THAT work?
Every morning before school each and every parent gathers to "preview" the days lesson? Then, they take a vote?
Jack and Jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water.
No!
It must be...
Evangelist Jack and Jill went up the hill, thinking only religious thoughts, to fetch a pail of holy water, however only with first having their parents permission. And neither Jack nor Jill had any gay thoughts as they fetched.
And Jack did not fall down and break his crown, Jack knelt to the ground thanking god they were born white and not black. And not born fags.
DES MOINES, Iowa — Parents’ rights relating to their children’s education has been a widely debated topic. A bill outlining what those specific rights would entail has been introduced in the Iowa Senate.
Debated topic?
Only because a few radical homophobic, racist mothers made this into a "debated topic".
The bill lists out several things that would be implemented into law, such as parents being able to know what is being taught to their kids; requiring written permission ahead of time for lessons that contain obscene material; access to information to hold school board members accountable, etc. The bill’s sponsor outlines some misconceptions of the legislation.
Oh... Great...
Now we'll see just how many new teachers this will attract into teaching.
And, how many of the current teachers will remain in teaching.
“What this bill does not do is ban a book. What this bill does not do is vilify a teacher,” Sinclair said. “What this bill does not do is prevent schools from teaching things that are uncomfortable. But what it does do is put a parent in the driver’s seat of what ultimately their child is exposed to in our tax-funded educational system.”
And so.... You have a parent of a gay kid vs the anti-gay homophobic racist religious fundamentalist parent. One opposes the teachers lesson of the day, the other does not. Which parent do you think will win out? And, what further laws and constraints will that anti-gay homophobic racist religious fundamentalist parent deem necessary to impose next? Heinrich Himmler in every class with a whip?
Commentary:
You know.... any parent who wishes to do so can simply "sit-in" on a class, as an observer. So WHY do we need more laws just because of some homophobe anti-gay racist religious fundamentalist parent? Why would that homophobe anti-gay racist religious fundamentalist parent want to run to their state legislature instead of simply sitting-in on a class. Even just one class might be nice.
Who do these anti-gay racist religious fundamentalist parents think are teaching their kids in the first place? Some hairy naked guy wearing a leather jockstrap?
I thought that republicans, and iOwa is a republican controlled state, but I thought republicans were for fewer laws and constraints, not more. And for more freedoms?
I swear, someone has figured out a way to clone Adolf Hitler from his ashes, duplicating the process several times over, then installing as republican governors across the country. And, in republican state legislatures.
We haven't seen this nonsense since Nazi Germany back in 1938, and that WAS only in Nazi Germany.
Parents.... banning books, deciding which books people can and can not read, telling the teacher what they can and can not teach, and parent approval of every subject matter to be taught by a teacher.
And how does THAT work?
Every morning before school each and every parent gathers to "preview" the days lesson? Then, they take a vote?
Jack and Jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water.
No!
It must be...
Evangelist Jack and Jill went up the hill, thinking only religious thoughts, to fetch a pail of holy water, however only with first having their parents permission. And neither Jack nor Jill had any gay thoughts as they fetched.
And Jack did not fall down and break his crown, Jack knelt to the ground thanking god they were born white and not black. And not born fags.
Last edited: