• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OGR-26

S

squaddie

Junior Member
This morning i saw the cow was busy with OGR-26, which is a little strange because there is no info about the start of OGR-26. See the output of the cow.

[Feb 12 09:26:31 UTC] OGR: Loaded 26/1-3-18-5-11-30 (4.74 Gnodes done)
[Feb 12 09:26:31 UTC] OGR: 5 packets remain in buff-in.ogr
[Feb 12 09:26:31 UTC] OGR: 0 packets are in buff-out.ogr
[Feb 12 09:26:31 UTC] 1 cruncher has been started.
[Feb 12 12:30:05 UTC] #1: OGR:26/1-3-18-5-11-30+57-6-14-15 [42,400,320,180]

One of you guys know anything?
 
D.net maybe testing like they did with ogr-25, to find the best length for a stub. But i haven't heard of anything.
 
Wouldn't be too suprised if they were indeed doing ssome early testing. As long as you get credit, it shouldn't be too bad.😉
 
OK, does anybody else understand that stub read-out?

OGR:26/1-3-18-5-11-30+57-6-14-15

It looks like a 6-stub (1-3-18-5-11-30), but there is 4 more numbers listed after the + sign... Does this mean it is a 10-stub unit? I definitely think they need to make the OGR units with more stubs (an OGR-26/6 stub would be HUGE).

JHutch
 
JHutch,
The line "[Feb 12 09:26:31 UTC] OGR: Loaded 26/1-3-18-5-11-30 (4.74 Gnodes done)" leads me to believe that it is indeed an OGR-26/6 stub.

The line "[Feb 12 12:30:05 UTC] #1: OGR:26/1-3-18-5-11-30+57-6-14-15 [42,400,320,180]" that you cite, looks like a stub in progress line.

I know that I read somewhere that they had already decided on the OGR-26 stub length, but this does indeed look like a test. This could be like the OGR-25/5 stubs that were "test" only.
 
Joe O,

It is the +57-6-14-15 that has me confused. Unless I haven't looked at the latest client close enough, I haven't seen the progress display look like that on a OGR25 unit...

I agree that they are probably testing (hence, no official announcements yet), but it makes me wonder what sort of strangeness they have up their sleeve...

JHutch
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top