buckshot24
Diamond Member
- Nov 3, 2009
- 9,916
- 85
- 91
I'm just wondering...
In what context could Mittens saying "The government does not create jobs" be favorable...or true?
What the **** is he talking about? The government creates jobs both directly and indirectly, so I'm completely confused by why he even said that; snarking while he said it even.
Moron.
Intrade odds on Obama winning 2nd debate go from 70% before debate to 99% after. Gives you a good idea of what happened, lol.
A gooberment job doesn't help the economy it hurts , Its helps the 1 person but hurts the tax payers as its part of the debt problem , You can;t fix a problem by adding to it , So alot of these so called new jobs are gooberment and replaceing the 10,000 jobs that people retire from every day , Basicly we have a net job loss in private sector and a gain in the gooberment sector. NOT good not good at all
Is that the same Intrade that had Obamacare being struck down at 77%? Gives you a good idea of its relevance, lol.
77% is hardly a lock. You'd have a point if it was at 99%.
It looks like a demon has gotten a hold of you, you are lying again!
I know you aren't talking about Obamas job numbers because most of his growth had come from the private sector. If we were adding more government jobs as past presidents have done unemployment would be even lower and the recovery would be stronger.
It looks like a demon has gotten a hold of you, you are lying again!
I know you aren't talking about Obamas job numbers because most of his growth had come from the private sector. If we were adding more government jobs as past presidents have done unemployment would be even lower and the recovery would be stronger.
The point you're missing is we need other jobs to support those government jobs. If there was no government there would be jobs but if there were no private sector there would be no government jobs. If you think otherwise then lets just hire everybody in the country to work for the government and see how long our economy lasts.So, what you're saying is, that teachers, firefighters, policemen, corrections officers, NASA and all iterations of supporting industries that made this country great from the 60's all the way to present, and say, ALL OF THE MILITARY are hurting tax payers?
You're going to have to explain yourself on that one.
So, what you're saying is, that teachers, firefighters, policemen, corrections officers, NASA and all iterations of supporting industries that made this country great from the 60's all the way to present, and say, ALL OF THE MILITARY are hurting tax payers?
You're going to have to explain yourself on that one.
The point you're missing is we need other jobs to support those government jobs. If there was no government there would be jobs but if there were no private sector there would be no government jobs. If you think otherwise then lets just hire everybody in the country to work for the government and see how long our economy lasts.
Obummer added 600,000 gooberment jobs in last 2 months . It was in first debate no denile was made
Simply mentioning "terror attack" isn't calling it one. Plus you have all those lies about a video which is what the real problem was. Obama wasn't calling it a terror attack even if he mentioned "terror attack" in that speech."Get the transcript" -Obama
I LOL'ed so hard when Romney got caught in his own trap.
No, the point you're missing is no matter how you slice it, the government creates jobs. DIRECTLY and INDIRECTLY.
Don't jump in this conversation half-removed without answering my original question.
I'm more convinced than ever after this debate that Obama is toast. He's up there flailing around, he has no answer for this economy.Nope. You better get that demon checked out, it's turning you into a liar.
http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/e...nment-jobs-are-finally-starting-to-come-back/
http://www.politifact.com/new-jerse...ssman-bill-pascrell-says-more-600000-public-/
But hey it wasn't denied in the first debate so it must be true! /s
Twist it around anyway you want ,,, Thats what demons do . You can also create laws that need to be inforced so you hire more cops to enforce laws or you create more regulations . Because there all theives and give the appearance there trying control it , SHOW TIME FOLKS / Creating more laws so you can hire more folks to inforce them is not progress . its regression .
Simply mentioning "terror attack" isn't calling it one. Plus you have all those lies about a video which is what the real problem was. Obama wasn't calling it a terror attack even if he mentioned "terror attack" in that speech.