**Official LOTR: The Two Towers thread - 100% Fresh at Rotten tomatoes so far - LESS THAN 2 WEEKS LEFT!

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
oh man...I can't wait til the 18th.


My last exam is 930-12 on the 18th. Then get some drinks and go see LotR!! :)


sweeeeeet
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
Just realized its at 100% fresh at rotten tomatoes. let's see if it can stay in the 95-100% range like last year :D
 

Storm

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 1999
3,952
0
76
Heres a faq for TTT from someone who has seen an advance screening of it.
Here
If you dont want to spoil your virgin eyes then dont click the link
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
Check out this review from Oscar Watch :Q:Q:Q:Q:Q

Whether you liked Fellowship or not, it does not matter. The Two Towers is one of the greatest cinematic achievements of all time, and it should not be missed.

Everything brilliant about Jackson's Fellowship returns here (minus Sean Bean of course), and more is added. Top of that list must be Andy Serkis as Gollum, the ring-junkie we got just a glimpse of in Fellowship. One of the best performances of the year, Serkis easily steals the spotlight from the excellent Elijah Wood and much-improved Sean Astin. And the fact that he is a CGI creation should not matter. Andy Serkis clocked more hours on Rings then any other actor, and his performance is mesmerising (especially a very disturbing scene where he talks to Smeagol, the hobbit he once was).

Story-wise, it continues straight from Fellowship. Frodo and Sam must go to Mordor to destroy the Ring; Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Gimli (John RhysDavies) and Legolas (Orlando Bloom), are searching for the kidnapped hobbits Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd). The first thirty minutes and so cramed and packed with information that some people may be un-nerved, but rest assured, the pacing soon regains normality, but you're still in for a wild ride.

The movie looks better then Fellowship. The scenery is heart stopping. The cinematography by Lesnie is improved upon. Howard Shore's score is a wonderful continuation on Fellowship's Oscar winning composition, but it grows and suits the film even better this time. The CGI is also improved, mostly in the flawless Gollum, the greatest CGI character of all time, and the amazing final hour, which I will get to shortly. At times, the CGI could be better (on the warg battle particularly), but the story whisps you along so well you just fail to care.

It is hardly rehassed material as well. Ian McKellan delivers another great performance, this time as Gandalf the White, almost a different character then the one we see fall down into the Abyss at the start of the film. Most impressive I felt was some creative ideas mirroring the Aragorn/Arwen relationship, which includes a sorrowful future glimpse into the future, with Arwen standing beside her lovers grave.

But the stealer of the movie is the final hour. Easily one of the greatest battles, if not the greatest battle, of cinema history, Helm's Deep is tragic, violent, exhausting, and simply breath-taking. An attack on Isengard follows, which almost tops this 30 minute masterpiece. Words simply don't describe what Peter Jackson and his crew have done for these two battles. You feel like you are there, dodging swords, arrows, axes, and falling boulders.

I cannot give high enough praise to this film. It is the year's best film, and a milestone in cinema history.
 

tedthebear

Senior member
Jul 5, 2001
236
0
0
I am a big Tolkien fan and I LOVED the first movie with very few complaints but this new one left me with mixed feelings overall. They made too many plot changes for one. Even tho I understand that they have to make adjustments to squeeze everything into 3 hours, I felt that the plot changes they made added about an hour to the movie that could have been used for what they left out! There was too much Helm's Deep and not enough Fangorn for my taste.
Also, the special effects during the ents attack on Isenguard looked really fake. The flood water looked real, but the panoramic shot of the ents walking in the water looked like little stick models which was a shame. The director should have kept the camera point of view on the ground looking UP at the ents so that they always seem huge like trees.
Still, the director did a fantastic job on such a vast project as this and I shouldn't be so picky, but I am a fanatic, so I can't help it.

BTW, Gollum was fantastic and worth the price of admission all by himself (my precious).
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,986
11
81
Yes, now that you mention it, I would have loved to see a camera on the ground pan across, and then settle between two Ents while facing the onrushing water. Maybe even a little 'rooting' action done (with their feet?) - no pun intended.