Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
I can see 2 reasons why Intel would give so much cache to the P4.
1.) They know the performance of the Athlon 64 will decisively beat a normal P4 and the extra cache will somewhat even things up
2.) They know the performance of the Athlon 64 will give top end P4's more than a good run and the extra cache will give them back the lead
Something tells me it's closer to reason #1 than #2...
What really constitutes a "normal" P4....wouldn't it be safe to assume that since Intel has already decided to bump the cache that these are now considered "normal" P4s?? I am not a psychic but I agree with a few of the others, to think that intel will sit idly by and let AMD gain a performance lead is pretty silly....only time will tell what the future holds.
Um, Prescot? Isn't that Intel's solution to the Athlon 64? Prescot which = .09 micron fab and 1MB of L2 cache? Of which the P4 Extreme Edition is still 512KB of L2?
The only difference between the Extreme Edition 3.2GHz P4 and teh "Normal" 3.2GHz P4 is the EXTRA 2MB of L3 cache, not as fast as L2 but probably worth it to reduce memory latency. When I say "normal P4" I'm meaning the ones that don't have 2MB of L2 cache. I say this because I assume Intel has stopped the P4 at 3.2GHz (of which I believe the Prescot will get a new name, P5 or PV or whatever) and I believe all they did was add 2MB of L3 cache to their flagship P4 chip, making it their "Extreme Edition" P4. "Extreme Edition", why in the hell call it "Extreme Edition" if all the new "editions" of the P4 are going to have the same 2MB of L3 cache. If you ask me the Extreme Edition P4 is going to be the last P4, from 1.3GHz to 3.2GHz and quite a bit of cache later, I'd say the P4 is pretty much done, time for P5 against the Athlon 64. Intel is just "rushing" this last bad boy P4 because Prescot apparently won't be ready/cheap enough to compete with the Athlon 64...