Originally posted by: mariok2006
What a steal...
Can't wait for the comparison test with the V spec.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
I like how the viper has good gas mileage all of a sudden. :laugh:And the racetrack isn't the only place where the ZR1 trumps its super-car competitors - it beats them at the gas pump, too. According to fueleconomy.gov, the ZR1's EPA-rated 14 city and 20 highway mileage ratings beat 2008 competitors such as the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano (11 city / 15 highway); the Lamborghini Murcielago (8 city / 13 highway) and the Aston Martin V8 Vantage (12 city / 19 highway). They're competitive with the Dodge Viper (13 city / 22 highway) and the Porsche 911 GT3 (15 city / 22 highway).
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
Wow, finally, a car that can beat my motorcycle 0-60. Still, my bike cost $6500 OTD and gets 48 mpg city.![]()
Originally posted by: AdamK47
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
Wow, finally, a car that can beat my motorcycle 0-60. Still, my bike cost $6500 OTD and gets 48 mpg city.![]()
Quit being so JulesMaximus.
Originally posted by: Akiba
I'd rather take the Nissan GT-R than that crap
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
Wow, finally, a car that can beat my motorcycle 0-60. Still, my bike cost $6500 OTD and gets 48 mpg city.![]()
Originally posted by: Akiba
I'd rather take the Nissan GT-R than that crap
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Is the interior not going to suck?
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Is the interior not going to suck?
Now I cant tell if you meant that as a joke or not, but we all know you're a big fan of the Elise (as am I), and the interior of the Elise is quite spartan and sucky too. So it's not really fair for you go "neener" at another car's interior sucking when one of your favorite car's interior isnt all that good to begin with. Unless you've openly admitted that the Elise's interior is lacking (I've never seen that here).
Originally posted by: sjwaste
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
Wow, finally, a car that can beat my motorcycle 0-60. Still, my bike cost $6500 OTD and gets 48 mpg city.![]()
Let's run them head on, shall we?![]()
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Is the interior not going to suck?
Now I cant tell if you meant that as a joke or not, but we all know you're a big fan of the Elise (as am I), and the interior of the Elise is quite spartan and sucky too. So it's not really fair for you go "neener" at another car's interior sucking when one of your favorite car's interior isnt all that good to begin with. Unless you've openly admitted that the Elise's interior is lacking (I've never seen that here).
The Elise doesn't cost $100k though.
Originally posted by: Kromis
Originally posted by: Akiba
I'd rather take the Nissan GT-R than that crap
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: yelo333
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000
I like how the viper has good gas mileage all of a sudden. :laugh:And the racetrack isn't the only place where the ZR1 trumps its super-car competitors - it beats them at the gas pump, too. According to fueleconomy.gov, the ZR1's EPA-rated 14 city and 20 highway mileage ratings beat 2008 competitors such as the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano (11 city / 15 highway); the Lamborghini Murcielago (8 city / 13 highway) and the Aston Martin V8 Vantage (12 city / 19 highway). They're competitive with the Dodge Viper (13 city / 22 highway) and the Porsche 911 GT3 (15 city / 22 highway).
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Is the interior not going to suck?
Now I cant tell if you meant that as a joke or not, but we all know you're a big fan of the Elise (as am I), and the interior of the Elise is quite spartan and sucky too. So it's not really fair for you go "neener" at another car's interior sucking when one of your favorite car's interior isnt all that good to begin with. Unless you've openly admitted that the Elise's interior is lacking (I've never seen that here).
The Elise doesn't cost $100k though.
the Elise doesnt have 600 hp either.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Is the interior not going to suck?
Now I cant tell if you meant that as a joke or not, but we all know you're a big fan of the Elise (as am I), and the interior of the Elise is quite spartan and sucky too. So it's not really fair for you go "neener" at another car's interior sucking when one of your favorite car's interior isnt all that good to begin with. Unless you've openly admitted that the Elise's interior is lacking (I've never seen that here).
The Elise doesn't cost $100k though.
the Elise doesnt have 600 hp either.
The Elise doesn't need it either.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
GM has just revealed the official performance figures:
0-60 - 3.4 sec.
0-100 - 7.0 sec.
1/4 mile - 11.3 @ 131 mph
EPA-estimated fuel economy of 14 city and 20 highway
http://jalopnik.com/396344/200...te-z...8-hp-for-103000