yea, I'm pretty happy with the hire. He's a solid coach, that can teach fundamentals, defense and TEAM play. too often UCLA had a bunch of guys trying to showcase for the league.
What I didn't like was the article in the Times today that JA Adande wrote about Howland being the safe choice etc. I'm fine with the safe choice. He WANTS to coach at UCLA, which goes a long way in my book. I think he's a solid get and could last here a while. He grew up in Cerritos watching UCLA play. He knows what the fans have seen in the past, so knows first hand about the tradition and 11 banners hanging in Pauley.
UCLA fans have been painted unreasonable by the media but like bruined wrote, what they want is:
1. basketball played in a structured way, a system, not playground ball
2. no bad losses
3. no slumping at the beginning of the season, then playing just well enough to get to the sweet 16 and then get blown out
4. Play consistent basketball to get a high seed in the tournament. Lavin's teams were always inconsistent, I think the highest seed under him was a 3 his first season and a 5 the others.
UCLA fans expect the program to be like Kansas,Arizona,Kentucky and Duke. Competitive every year for the Conference title, getting to the Final Four around once every 4 years. That may seem like alot, but that's what schools like Arizona, Kentucky and Duke do, year in and year out. Kansas I would include in the competitiveness, but the first time they made the final four since '88 was last year.