Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: Lothar
As long as I do better than the S&P 500, I don't care so much about rankings.
So far since I started Jan 17th(my 1st purchase)
ATOT VSE portfolio: +10.42%
S&P 500: +0.43%
Doesn't risk matter here though? I've seen emerging markets funds brag about how well they did relative to the S&P500, when in fact the EM fund had a much higher beta. Wouldn't risk-adjusted returns be a better measure?
Every stock my portfolio has a lower beta than the S&P500 index, therefore my portfolio overall carries a lot less risk.
My portfolio was only down -1.02% today.
Compare that with the -2.20% and -2.30% drop in the S&P500 and Nasdaq.
There's no EM funds there.
All money made so far has been on longs.
I could go the easy route and short Citi, Capital One, Washington Mutual, Ambac/MBIA, but I don't believe in short selling stocks that much.
If it's that easy to beat the S&P500 on a risk-adjusted basis, then why invest in mutual funds at all? Heck, if you can do that, why not be a fund manager, since 80% of them cannot beat their benchmark index in the long term after expenses are subtracted?
My question is somewhat rhetorical, but as a novice investor who stumbled onto the diehards forum, I often question their strategy of buying and holding low expense index funds when everywhere I look, someone claims to be making a fortune through trading.
Because most mutual/index funds offer something I can't get or don't want to waste time getting.
For US/domestic stocks I generally pick my own stocks(FAIRX is the only exception).
I can easily use my friends CapitalIQ info or the SEC website to look up information.
In the US I can easily search and lookup financial statements myself which isn't too much of a hassle and I actually know about the company's product.
For foreign companies, it's a different matter.
I'm only directly in 4 foreign companies for her. Everything else(majority) foreign is in index funds. I don't want to waste time researching the hundreds/thousands of companies on the Mexican Bolsa index when I can just pick a Mexican or Latin American fund and be done with.
I'm in VIPSX because I know little about treasuries other than they're good to hold at certain times and they add diversification.
I like my current job as a healthcare professional and wouldn't trade it for the world.
I also like that my job won't be a cyclical business.
The same reason why eventhough I built my own computer, I'd never major in computer science(or anything related to it).
"fortune"? The term in itself is relative.
Just because a person says they have a 10% return doesn't mean anything.
Do you know if that return is from a $100 investment portfolio or a $1 million one?
In fact the bigger your portfolio, the less chances of you making big returns. That's why some mutual funds are closed to new investors. I'm sure you've heard Buffett and many others complain that it's hard to make juicy returns when you control billions of dollars worth of portfolio.
And yes for
MOST people, holding index funds will be better than going to buy stocks in companies you know nothing about because someone else told you so or because you drink their coffee every morning.
Anyone IRL who mentions investment advice, I give them the evil eye look and tell them index funds.
In conclusion, diehards forum has the correct strategy. Stay with them.