I voted down on the first deal, didn't vote at all on the 2nd, but I'm pretty sure I already explained that. It looked great for you, but not a trade where the other guy looked like he was trading to win. It looked like he was either asleep at the wheel and clicked yes or was just trading away his good players to mail it in. There doesn't need to be any collusion for those kinds of trades to damage the league. Nobody would like it if I took some part timer for Miguel Cabrera because I stopped giving a shit, for instance. People should vote that down in the interest of league integrity.
That's the first time I've weighed in on any trade. It looked that bad to me. If I'm wrong about that, so be it, that's why it takes a majority. I'm not trying to stonewall anyone from improving their team, but when the trade looks like that, it's hard to see it as legitimate.