Okay, that is good to know. Are there any advantages to using 2013 over 2010? Any negatives about it? I have read that it has been redesigned for Windows 8 and tablets.
I used 2003 for many years was happy with it. I bought 2010 primarily because I thought it may be the last version that was designed for a desktop. I used for about three weeks and then upgraded to 2013 under Microsoft's promotion.
I am not that picky, so I do not see a lot of difference between 2010 and 2013, except 2013 is oriented towards tablet use with simpler interfaces. It is not as tablet-oriented as Windows 8, so the changes won't bother most desktop users. However, some people have freaked-out about little issues, like limited color choices. Either version is fine for my desktop.
The most important negative with 2013 for me is that is available to the retail market only in the Click-2-Run version. One has to have a volume license to access (legally) the "msi" version.
Although some of the "experts" think Click-2-Run is great, I think it sucks. First, one is forced to install the entire suite. There are no choices about which application a user may want to install -- all or none. And secondly, updates are no longer included in "Microsoft Update" (the updates listed are for the msi version). The suite updates periodically in the background. I do not like automatic updates for any software, so I turn-off the update feature and then turn-on after "Patch Tuesday". It typically downloads a new version immediately. I let it install and then turn updates off again. The only information provided is the version number. I have to search Microsoft's website if I want to know what was updated.