- Oct 30, 2004
- 808
- 0
- 76
As my photo collection grows in size, exponentially since the acquisition of my D50 last year, I'm giving more thought to backing up my digital files to off-site storage. I currently mirror my pictures on two separate hard drives, but don't want to just keep burning files to DVD only.
I've only cursorily used Flickr, pics.bbzzdd, etc, so bear with my ignorance here, please. Is it possible, to use something like Flickr or Smugmug to store my photos, which would then be retrievable in their original size, not just shrunk down to 1024 or whatever they display at on the page?
I'm only interested in storing JPEG at this point, I don't shoot enough RAW for it to be unmanageable with DVDR archiving yet. But I would like to get my photos back in pristine form in the event of a fire or other catastrophe. I have no problem paying the $25/year to Flickr if I could actually do this, but from what I've read in their TOS, there's no guarantee this is possible.
Would I be better off using a data backup service like Carbonite, rather than a photo hosting service?
Thanks for any input.
I've only cursorily used Flickr, pics.bbzzdd, etc, so bear with my ignorance here, please. Is it possible, to use something like Flickr or Smugmug to store my photos, which would then be retrievable in their original size, not just shrunk down to 1024 or whatever they display at on the page?
I'm only interested in storing JPEG at this point, I don't shoot enough RAW for it to be unmanageable with DVDR archiving yet. But I would like to get my photos back in pristine form in the event of a fire or other catastrophe. I have no problem paying the $25/year to Flickr if I could actually do this, but from what I've read in their TOS, there's no guarantee this is possible.
Would I be better off using a data backup service like Carbonite, rather than a photo hosting service?
Thanks for any input.
