Atari2600
Golden Member
- Nov 22, 2016
- 1,409
- 1,655
- 136
Filters don't work properly for the AMD products. I wouldn't read much into it, it's probably a bug.
Sorry nope.
Benefit of the doubt stopped applying over 10 years ago.
Filters don't work properly for the AMD products. I wouldn't read much into it, it's probably a bug.
C'mon man, you know you're not supposed to use 4 letter words here.
AT Moderator ElFenix
I wasn't appealing to benefit of the doubt, but common corporate sense: look at the filter menu, it was such a rushed up job they left the options in alphabetical order which means all AMD options are on top!Benefit of the doubt stopped applying over 10 years ago.

You overestimate how much companies care. Hell, even Smeltdown didn't seem to have much of an effect on Intel's client sales; only really the shortage. And it's going to be tough to compel them to switch on just more cores when most of the workloads is not much more than Office and Chrome.
Ah, talk is cheap.
How many AMD based laptops are out there with top quality chassis?
Acer seemed pretty effing happy and caring with what AMD is offering with Zen2 and Navi, per the keynote.
And they are one of the largest mfg's of PC stuff in the world.
If Dr. Su was a he the Acer guy would have been on his knees.
I remember actual brick and mortar Gateway stores in my area around 1996 or so. I think you couldn't actually buy anything in them. Just test machines and place orders. I was a Mac guy then.Lol, can we resurrect Gateway with the cow print boxes, but with fair prices and a good website?
We aren't implying sexual acts here either.
AT Moderator ElFenix
I think this is something that people often fail to understand when they make predictions of AMD swiping huge chunks of marketshare from Intel in the near future. Yes, enthusiasts will likely be flocking to Zen 2 en masse... but large corporate buyers, the ones who will buy more computers to stock up a single office than most enthusiasts will ever buy in their lifetime, will buy either whatever is cheapest, or whatever fits into their current set-up better. And in both cases, that's still likely to be Intel.Its mostly because when your office / work place already has intel based processors deployed on the field, its a nightmare to cross platforms on that single platform line.
Hence why AMD has it hard, because there isnt many companies which have a solid AMD infrastructure.
True given that both machines will run linux and windows near identically, its still on a logistic end as well as support end.
Having to give tech support a extra script when they ask if this an AMD based processor or an Intel based processor, and having the computer illiterate person answer "i dont know" makes it extra backlog in the chain of lines.
Until AMD has probably a solid 10 yrs of deployment, or chains of company that decides they are done with intel and starts flipping all the EOL machines to AMD, its going to be very difficult for AMD to gain any foothold in any OEM market place.
Heck, for an example, just check Dell's current server line-up; there may be the odd Epyc in there, but about half of their servers are still based on Broadwell!
but large corporate buyers, the ones who will buy more computers to stock up a single office than most enthusiasts will ever buy in their lifetime, will buy either whatever is cheapest, or whatever fits into their current set-up better. And in both cases, that's still likely to be Intel.
