• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

odor eating light bulb

kkeennyy

Banned
... but not too hard because glass shards are no fun in your mouth.

fresh2 compact fluorescent light bulbs remove odor while emitting energy efficient light
http://www.fresh2.com/


Let the wild,uniformed speculation begin. After that think of some alternate uses..
 
Well if that Flash presentation on their site doesn't sell you, I don't know what can!


Like every new product, I'll wait to see if it actually makes a difference before even considering it. Science is nice, but not always practical.


If it does work, why not just add Titanium Dioxide to all sorts of things, like wall paint and furniture stain protection, how about laundry detergent...
 
Titanium Dioxide is already in paint. It makes them very very white. I'm sure its the combo of heat and UV from the lamp that does the magic.
 
compact florescent bulbs = EVIL, PAINFUL to even have in peripheral view. Those and halogens should both be illegal.

Not worthwhile regardless of whether they remove odor.



 
Originally posted by: glugglug
compact florescent bulbs = EVIL, PAINFUL to even have in peripheral view. Those and halogens should both be illegal.

Not worthwhile regardless of whether they remove odor.

I personally am getting used to the compact fluorescent bulbs. After I move into the new house, we'll probably use them for all of the lighting. (plus, I plan on powering my house with windmills within a few years....)

 
So now the fact that the crappy florescent bulbs emit UV is a feature?? If I understand how this thing works properly, basically the UV light is breaking off Oxygen ions from the TiO2 coating. The effect and scent would then be the same as Ionic Breeze from Sharper Image or other room air ionizers.

And on the site about the bulbs, it says for them to work the light has to be uncovered (i.e. no diffuser). Sure it may remove odors -- if you don't value your vision.
 
Originally posted by: glugglug
So now the fact that the crappy florescent bulbs emit UV is a feature?? If I understand how this thing works properly, basically the UV light is breaking off Oxygen ions from the TiO2 coating. The effect and scent would then be the same as Ionic Breeze from Sharper Image or other room air ionizers.

And on the site about the bulbs, it says for them to work the light has to be uncovered (i.e. no diffuser). Sure it may remove odors -- if you don't value your vision.

Why is it that you don't like fluorescent lights?
I recently started switching all my lights to the smaller fluorescent bulbs. They are: brighter, whiter light, last much longer, use less energy. Of course, after a while they start to get dimmer (rather than dying suddenly like incandescent bulbs) - so when I reach that point, I'll just replace them. Despite the higher initial cost, they're saving me a fortune since my wife and kids are horrible about turning off lights. A few minutes on google, using the search terms "fluorescent" and "bad for your eyes" revealed nothing, so I wonder what it is that you know that the rest of us don't know.
 
Also, I'm pretty skeptical about the claimed effectiveness on the site. (about eliminating odors)
 
Why is it that you don't like fluorescent lights?
I recently started switching all my lights to the smaller fluorescent bulbs. They are: brighter, whiter light, last much longer, use less energy. Of course, after a while they start to get dimmer (rather than dying suddenly like incandescent bulbs) - so when I reach that point, I'll just replace them. Despite the higher initial cost, they're saving me a fortune since my wife and kids are horrible about turning off lights. A few minutes on google, using the search terms "fluorescent" and "bad for your eyes" revealed nothing, so I wonder what it is that you know that the rest of us don't know.


The way a flourescent light works is by exciting mercury vapor to emit UV-A and UV-C. The UV-C is absorbed by the phosphor coating and reemitted in the visible spectrum, the UV-A is not, and the UV-A makes it through the glass of the bulb. The UV-C absorbption and reemmission is of course not 100%, what it misses is in theory absorbed by the glass producing heat. The amount of UV-A should be very small, but under non-ideal conditions, like bad power input, it might not be.

Also, unlike incandescents, flourescents flicker horribly, which is part of why they are painful to look at. Ask anyone with a migraine which is worse: being near a flourescent or staring directly at the sun, and the answer will consistently be that the flourescent is worse. The other part of why they are bad, particularly without a diffuser is because as you said, they are smaller -- the light is more focused and intense, and its this intensity, not the total amount of light, that makes it painful. Similar to why you are supposed to wear eye protection when working with lasers.

I think it's fairly common knowledge that UV is not good for your eyes, contributing to cataracts and macular degeneration. While the amount of UV from the flourescents is not near as much as you get from the sun (they won't exactly tan you quickly...), since indoors even with them is generally much dimmer than outside, your pupils are more dilated and more of the UV that is there makes it in.

Also, the idea of them being whiter light is wrong, or rather, is pretty much an illusion. Incandescents have a smooth spectral curve, and while it is brighter on the red/orange part of the spectrum than the blue part, there are no gaps. Flourescents have very well-defined spectral lines, emitting mostly only very specific frequencies. One of these happen to fall in the range of the blue-sensing cones in your eye, which happen to be the ones most responsible for color perception. But since it's only at a specific part of that blue spectrum (and much of the greenish range is missing), while the light itself looks whiter, it doesn't reflect off other materials the same as true white light.
 
Okay, who's going to buy one and try it out and tells us all if this odor eating bulb works. That will be our independent peer review.

C'mon, take one for the team, who's in?
 
glugglug, I completely agree with you on the flickering... In fact, what you say is completely correct - - - for the older style fluorescent bulbs. And, as an occasional migraine sufferer, I know they pain they cause.

However, you're wrong to assume this applies to compact fluorescent bulbs.
Check here: http://www.fullspectrumsolutio...pact_fluorescent.shtml
Also, personally, I do not notice ANY flickering with the compact bulbs.

Plus, after reviewing a couple of eye related sites, none are saying anything negative about the compact fluorescent... in fact, they're praising them.
Apparently, there's something that can be done with the ballast to reduce the flicker.
Also, these full spectrum lights allegedly have a closer spectrum to the sun than incandescent bulbs. (I have yet to test this claim - piece of cake to do so though)
 
Back
Top