Odd WU series...

[UNLTuba]

My last four complete WUs have had the exact same AR - two of which had the exact same Ra, Dec. Am I crunching the same WU, or what's the deal? Is this some sort of a joke? Here is what I'm talking about. Just thought it was weird...

 

[Confused]

UNLTuba History Entry
Seti File Name 07jn01ab.2405.1184.690904.0
Time Recorded Fri 2001 Jun 08 2:41:11am (226 days 2 hr 9 min ago)
Ra, Dec 14.621, 18.01
Angle Range 0.417
Estimated Tera FLOPs 4.10872
Downloaded from seti@home -no date-
Downloaded from SetiQueue -no date-
Uploaded to SetiQueue Sun 2002 Jan 20 2:15:18am (1 hr 35 min ago)
Uploaded to seti@home at Sun 2002 Jan 20 2:15:19am (1 hr 35 min ago)
Last upload status success
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Completed by UNLTuba
Seti User ID 3400113
Platform i386-winnt-cmdline
Seti@home Version 3.03
Cpu Time 49 min 28 sec
14-Day Average Cpu Time 5 hr 2 min

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


UNLTuba History Entry
Seti File Name 07jn01ab.2405.1184.690904.100
Time Recorded Fri 2001 Jun 08 2:41:11am (226 days 2 hr 10 min ago)
Ra, Dec 14.621, 18.01
Angle Range 0.417
Estimated Tera FLOPs 4.10872
Downloaded from seti@home -no date-
Downloaded from SetiQueue -no date-
Uploaded to SetiQueue Sun 2002 Jan 20 1:25:40am (2 hr 26 min ago)
Uploaded to seti@home at Sun 2002 Jan 20 1:25:41am (2 hr 26 min ago)
Last upload status success
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Completed by UNLTuba
Seti User ID 3400113
Platform i386-winnt-cmdline
Seti@home Version 3.03
Cpu Time 7 hr 19 min
14-Day Average Cpu Time 5 hr 1 min




Each WU has a unique filename, which seems to be identical here apart from the first ends in .0 and the second ends in .100. These are two WUs 100 apart.

Also, if you look, the first was completed in 49 min 28 sec, which means that the particular WU was very noisy and so the program stopped processing it.

Hope this clears it up 🙂

ConfusedBW