OctaCore ARM 2ghz+ CPUs, Mediatek vs AllWinner performance?

[unseengundam101]

I am looking at a newer tablet and I am quite interested at 8-core, 2.0 ghz tablet you can get from MediaTek and Allwinner for under $150.

I am wondering about the performance of following chips:

MediaTek MT8392, ARMv7, 8 core, 2.0 ghz, Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 Mhz GPU
MediaTek MT6595, ARMv7, 2.1/2.2 ghz (4 core) + 1.7 ghz (4 core), PowerVR 6200 @ 600 Mhz GPU
MediaTek MT6595 Turbo, ARMv7, 2.4/2.5 ghz (4 core) + 1.7 ghz (4 core), PowerVR 6200 @ 600 Mhz GPU

AllWinner A83T, ARM Cortex-A7, 8 core, 2.0 ghz, PowerVR SGX544 @ 700 Mghz GPU


Can anyone point me to reviews and benchmark comparing these chipsets?

 

[sm625]

Detailed benchmark results:

They are about equal. They all score between 25k and 30k on antutu.

 

[monstercameron]

I am looking at a newer tablet and I am quite interested at 8-core, 2.0 ghz tablet you can get from MediaTek and Allwinner for under $150.

I am wondering about the performance of following chips:

MediaTek MT8392, ARMv7, 8 core, 2.0 ghz, Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 Mhz GPU
MediaTek MT6595, ARMv7, 2.1/2.2 ghz (4 core) + 1.7 ghz (4 core), PowerVR 6200 @ 600 Mhz GPU
MediaTek MT6595 Turbo, ARMv7, 2.4/2.5 ghz (4 core) + 1.7 ghz (4 core), PowerVR 6200 @ 600 Mhz GPU

AllWinner A83T, ARM Cortex-A7, 8 core, 2.0 ghz, PowerVR SGX544 @ 700 Mghz GPU



Can anyone point me to reviews and benchmark comparing these chipsets?

It should be fairly obvious that the a53 powered mediateks will be faster than the a7 powered allwinner. Even the gpu is beefed up with the rogue 6200 vs a relatively old sgx544.

 

[NTMBK]

It should be fairly obvious that the a53 powered mediateks will be faster than the a7 powered allwinner. Even the gpu is beefed up with the rogue 6200 vs a relatively old sgx544.

One of them actually has A17 cores, not A53.

 

[Nothingness]

They are about equal. They all score between 25k and 30k on antutu.

Did you even try to look up those SoC on Google? It seems obvious you didn't: MT6565 gets more than 50K on AnTuTu: http://www.fudzilla.com/news/mobile/36622-meizu-mx4-scores-51356-in-antutu

Now I am going to wash my hands for quoting an AnTuTu score.

 

[Thala]

One of them actually has A17 cores, not A53.

Should be obvious as all are ARMv7 not ARMv8.

 

[monstercameron]

Should be obvious as all are ARMv7 not ARMv8.

unless im misreading what you commented, a53 is arm v8, while a7 and a17 are v7.

 

[Exophase]

unless im misreading what you commented, a53 is arm v8, while a7 and a17 are v7.

Yes, and as per the original post all of these SoCs are ARMv7.

The MT6595 has 4x Cortex-A17 + 4x Cortex-A7 while the other two SoCs are 8x Cortex-A7. That should make it the obvious performance choice.

 

[unseengundam101]

Almost forgot, so I am guessing these ARM chips are faster than Intel Atoms? Especially for Android performance?