OC'd I5-750 @4GHz VS any other CPU?

Clorky

Member
Sep 12, 2012
95
0
61
Hello, the title may be misleading, but my question is pretty simple:

I have I5-750 OC'd at @4GHz with Noctua NH-U9B SE2
Graphics card: 7950 OC'd either.

Could there be a bottleneck?

Which CPU would you recommend for a gamer? Will there be a huge FPS difference if i get for example I5-2550K and OC it to like 4,0GHz?
Which is the lowest price/highest quality CPU for gaming?
And last question - What is the temperature border for I5-750?
 
Last edited:

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
I think you'd see maybe 15% more fps max by taking that upgrade, more like 8-10% average. I wouldnt do it. I wish I could run my i5-750 that high, but all I have is some xigmatek cooler that costed $5 AR. I let the thing get as hot as 88C. wth right? If it blows I'll buy a 3570k.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
Well if you get a 2500k/2550k then why stop at 4ghz? I'd think that 4.4-4.5ghz at similar vcore/temps would be more realistic and give a larger performance increase to you.
 

Bill Brasky

Diamond Member
May 18, 2006
4,324
1
0
Could there be a bottleneck?

Yes.

Which CPU would you recommend for a gamer? Will there be a huge FPS difference if i get for example I5-2550K and OC it to like 4,0GHz?

3570k.

This is very game dependent. Some games love more cpu and others don't care. For the games that will use more cpu, you might see 10-30% fps gain and better minimums depending on your settings. Will it be HUGE? In my opinion, no.


Which is the lowest price/highest quality CPU for gaming?

Do you live near a Microcenter? This makes a difference.

And last question - What is the temperature border for I5-750?

I didn't like going higher than 75C, but I think thermal throttling begins around 95C? I'm not sure about that. It could be 105.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/109?vs=701
 

Clorky

Member
Sep 12, 2012
95
0
61
Thanks guys!

Well if you get a 2500k/2550k then why stop at 4ghz? I'd think that 4.4-4.5ghz at similar vcore/temps would be more realistic and give a larger performance increase to you.
I can't. System resets after going higher than 4,1GHz - Overclock failed, but the cooler should be theoretically more effective, right?
Also, after Prime95 stresses for like an hour, max. temps in HWinfo reached 82 degrees Celsia, but only for like a second, so i don't really pay that much attention on that.
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
I don't really think it's worth swapping out a i5-750 clocked that high. Hang on to what you have until you have trouble getting a new game release to run satisfactorily.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
Thanks guys!


I can't. System resets after going higher than 4,1GHz - Overclock failed, but the cooler should be theoretically more effective, right?
Also, after Prime95 stresses for like an hour, max. temps in HWinfo reached 82 degrees Celsia, but only for like a second, so i don't really pay that much attention on that.

This is with your i5-750?

4ghz is about the normal limit on the i5-750's without some hard core tweaking....Best I remember getting on mine is 4.4ghz or so but it takes a lot of tinkering around.

Just in case....You do realize you'd have to change your MB to upgrade.

The 2500/2550k's have a lot more overclocking headroom unless you get a dud of a chip. 4.4-4.5ghz or so shouldn't be too hard.

My 2550k's limit looks to be just above 5.6ghz with some crazy vcore :)

My 2550k does 4.5ghz @1.3v's VS my old i5-750 4ghz @1.325v's
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
20,222
7,342
136
Don't upgrade. I have a very similar system and you're only going to get a minimal increase in speed by exchanging your CPU+mboard. If you really need extra FPS then add another 7950 for CF.
 

I4AT

Platinum Member
Oct 28, 2006
2,631
3
81
I wouldn't bother until Haswell and DDR4. If you switch over now you're making a small upgrade to a platform that's nearing its EOL, and by the time it's necessary to make the large upgrade you have to start from scratch with a whole new socket.

Unless you're a 2560x1440 or 120hz gamer I see no reason why a 4ghz Nehalem isn't enough for any of today's games. And if that were the case you probably would've upgraded already without asking.
 

Clorky

Member
Sep 12, 2012
95
0
61
Thank you.

Allright, so, last question - Is 4.0GHz temperatures allright reaching sometimes more than 75? Or should i go for 3,8GHz and keep the temperatures a little below 75?
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
Thank you.

Allright, so, last question - Is 4.0GHz temperatures allright reaching sometimes more than 75? Or should i go for 3,8GHz and keep the temperatures a little below 75?

Temps around 75*C under extreme loads isn't bad....Pretty much inline with the guys running stock intel coolers at stock speeds for the most part.
 

Makaveli

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2002
5,026
1,624
136
Hello, the title may be misleading, but my question is pretty simple:

I have I5-750 OC'd at @4GHz with Noctua NH-U9B SE2
Graphics card: 7950 OC'd either.

Could there be a bottleneck?

Which CPU would you recommend for a gamer? Will there be a huge FPS difference if i get for example I5-2550K and OC it to like 4,0GHz?
Which is the lowest price/highest quality CPU for gaming?
And last question - What is the temperature border for I5-750?

I would wait for haswell!
 

nforce4max

Member
Oct 5, 2012
88
0
0
You can reduce any noticeable bottleneck by improving the memory i/o performance and keeping up to date when it comes to storage. Slow and aging drives make terrible bottlenecks for any games that are very sensitive to the page file.
 
Nov 26, 2005
15,197
403
126
Hang in there, Haswell is right around the corner.. save your money now and buy the platform when it arrives. Basically what I'm doin.
 

Denithor

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2004
6,298
23
81
Let me give you the benefit of my personal experience here.

I went from an i5 750 @ 3.2GHz in my main box to an i7 3770 @ 4.2GHz. GPU is 7870 (not overclocked). I saw some improvements in games but nothing earthshattering, mostly things just got a little smoother.

Regarding temperatures, I run my gear in a very cramped HTPC case with the PSU mounted just above the HSF. With a stock cooler on the i5, when encoding video it routinely hit 95-98C and would throttle down to prevent overheating. I got a lower profile cooler (Scythe Kozuti) for the i7 and it never gets above 80C doing the same work. So your temps are fine, no worries there.

Overall I'd say wait for Haswell. I was planning to do exactly that but found my i7 in the for sale section here for $200 and couldn't resist. :)
 

MrK6

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2004
4,458
4
81
I went from an i5-750 @ 4.1GHz to a 2500K @ 5.0GHz. In games the difference is minimal, usually unnoticeable (rendering however, it blows it away). At the time I was comparing Skyrim bottlenecks running more cells of the world at a time (before the game was patched and better optimized), as well as BF3 multiplayer. Basically any game/situation that was enough to deter my experience on the i5-750, the 2500K helped but wasn't dramatically better.
 

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
My i5 2500K overclocked to 4.5GHz doubled my benchmark scores from an E8400 using the same 2 GTX 460 1GB.

I'll never half to upgrade my CPU again.
 

RaistlinZ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2001
7,470
9
91
I would put money 5 years from now you won't still be on a 2500k!

:cool:

Heh, he just might be. My i7-930 feels just as fast today as the day I built it 2 years ago. I can certainly see it lasting 3 more years if my needs don't change. I bet the 2500k would be the same.