Okay. So the R9 280X 'wins' by default because it's simply faster. But is it $100 faster?
I can't decide between the two cards. I can afford either, but I don't want to waste $100 if it's not substantially faster than the 7950. I plan on overclocking both my i5 4670k and GPU.
Regarding the brand --
Sapphire's 7950 is the cheapest. $210; $190 AR
Gigabyte's looks like the choice for the R9 280X at $300 + 4$ shipping. It seems to hit nearly 1.2Ghz for overclocking.
Not sure what to get though. I'm finding it difficult to compare an overclocked 7950 to an overclocked R9 280X.
I can't decide between the two cards. I can afford either, but I don't want to waste $100 if it's not substantially faster than the 7950. I plan on overclocking both my i5 4670k and GPU.
Regarding the brand --
Sapphire's 7950 is the cheapest. $210; $190 AR
Gigabyte's looks like the choice for the R9 280X at $300 + 4$ shipping. It seems to hit nearly 1.2Ghz for overclocking.
Not sure what to get though. I'm finding it difficult to compare an overclocked 7950 to an overclocked R9 280X.
Last edited: