Obama's Safe Schools Czar Promoting Porn And Extreme Sex In The Classroom (NSFW)

Status
Not open for further replies.

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
A few days ago we were posting on the appropriateness of gay marriage. We had the legal argument, the moral argument, the universality of love argument. Glossed over in the discussion was the influence of groups like Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) and North American Man/Boy Love Association ( NAMBLA) in both the straight and the gay communities, what they see as a legitimate agenda and the executive representation they have in the Obama Administration.

It is difficult to imagine the convolution of morality and law which enables government at both State and Federal levels to condone both the goals and the mechanisms of libertine activity by proponents of pedophilia.

Perhaps because it is a NSFW topic, the press won't cover it. But as they were enthusiastic in exposing pedophilia incidence in the Catholic Church, why do they now avoid examining government sponsored activity in schools around the country?

The story is breaking on sites such as BigGovernment.com, already well known for breaking the ACORN story.

This is worse.

I chose to link one more site that is carrying the story, but there are others which you can source on your own. You might not know him, but Jim Hoft is author of Gateway Pundit, one of the leading conservative blogs on the internet today and which currently draws over a quarter of a million readers each month. He has led the pack on many news stories and has been the guest of numerous radio talk shows and panel discussions on current events. Gateway Pundit is often linked by internet news sources and has been mentioned in the Washington Post, New York Sun, and the British daily, Telegraph.

The following story is graphic and the web links will lead to images and text which may get you fired if you bring them up at work. You will have to click to them on your own. The few extracts I include are out of hundreds that are provided. The language and the images have been approved for showing to your kids.

As an introduction to this story I first provide an extract of the BigGovernment.com coverage. The main story on Gateway Pundit follows.

To be clear, this post is not about supporting or not supporting gays or gay rights. This post is about the radical agenda of groups like GLSEN and activists like Kevin Jennings.

I make no excuses for this wall of text. Nobody is forcing you to read it. Your kids don't have that same choice it seems.

*****************************************

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/07...-promoted-fisting-to-14-year-olds/#more-41962

Fistgate: Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s 2000 Conference Promoted ‘Fisting’ to 14 Year-Olds
by Jim Hoft
BigGovernment.com

Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings founded the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) in 1990. In 2007 Kevin Jennings was paid $273,573.96 as the executive director of GLSEN. Recently he was appointed by the Obama administration to run the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools in the US Department of Education.

On Friday, Scott Baker from Breitbart.TV and Co-Host of ‘The B-Cast‘ submitted a shocking report on Obama’s deviant Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings. This report was posted at Gateway Pundit blog.

On Saturday, it was discovered that Kevin Jennings’ organization GLSEN sponsored a youth conference at Tuft’s University in March 2000. This conference was fully supported by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Safe Schools Program, the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and some of the presenters even received federal money. An undercover journalist with Mass Resistance was at the conference and recorded a couple of the workshops.

During one of the conference workshops an activist asks 14 year-old students, “Spit or swallow?… Is it rude?”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXaEoD6jJtw

That man doing the "counseling" is Kevin Jennings, who ran GLSEN, who is now Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar.

That’s not all. The conference also included a workshop where GLSEN activists promoted “fisting” to 14 year olds. Here is the shocking clip where the activists promoted “fisting” to the students:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jD2xtltgfw

The conference included students, teachers, and local and national activists. Mass Resistance recorded this discussion at a 2000 GLSEN conference workshop for children. Here is the transcript:

If it’s all about tolerance, why is the following question necessary?

David LaFontaine, chairman of the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth and the man who is mostly responsible for the Gay Straight Alliances in Massachusetts, tells us, “We believe very strongly that all students should not be sexually active in high school.”

Woman: Question is: What’s fisting?

Man: A little known fact is that you don’t make a fist like this. When they do it, it’s like this. This is a lot easier than this. [laughter]

Woman: You work your way up to it… [unclear] one finger, two fingers, three fingers … Some people can take a hand, or they can’t take a hand.

It’s about tolerance? If Gay Straight Alliances are not about sex, why are the people who run Gay Straight Alliances telling students about fisting? What you did not see is the man leading the discussion positioning his hand and showing 14 year olds how to insert their entire hand into the rectum of their sex partner.

You just heard a public employee promote “fisting” to 14-year-olds.

That man is Kevin Jennings, who ran GLSEN, who is now Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar.

To be clear, this post is not about supporting or not supporting gays or gay rights. This post is about the radical agenda of groups like GLSEN and activists like Kevin Jennings.

There’s more to come…

********************************************

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.co...om-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom – Kevin Jennings and the GLSEN Reading List

Jim Hoft
Gatewaypundit.com
Friday, December 4, 2009, 6:13 AM

Scott Baker from Breitbart-TV.com and Co-Host of ‘The B-Cast‘ submitted this shocking report today on Obama’s deviant Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings.

—-Warning on Content—–

I was recently approached by a team of independent researchers that I have known for some time and have come to trust. They prepared this report involving ‘Safe Schools Czar’ Kevin Jennings and the organization he founded, GLSEN, and asked that I find a way to help draw attention to what they uncovered. Knowing that Gateway Pundit has followed Kevin Jennings since his appointment, as we have on The B-Cast, and on Breitbart.tv, I felt this would be an appropriate place for this report.

Warning: The following material is very explicit.

Scott Baker
Co-Founder, Breitbart.tv
Co-Host, The B-Cast

Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings was the founder, and for many years, Executive Director of an organization called the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN started essentially as Jennings’ personal project and grew to become the culmination of his life’s work. And he was chosen by President Obama to be the nation’s Safe Schools Czar primarily because he had founded and led GLSEN.

GLSEN’s stated mission is to empower gay youth in the schools and to stop harassment by other students. It encourages the formation of Gay Student Alliances and condemns the use of hateful words. GLSEN also strives to influence the educational curriculum to include materials which the group believes will increase tolerance of gay students and decrease bullying. To that end, GLSEN maintains a recommended reading list of books that it claims “furthers our mission to ensure safe schools for all students.” In other words, these are the books that GLSEN’s directors think all kids should be reading: gay kids should read them to raise their self-esteem, and straight kids should read them in order to become more aware and tolerant and stop bullying gay kids. Through GLSEN’s online ordering system, called “GLSEN BookLink,” featured prominently on their Web site, teachers can buy the books to use as required classroom assignments, or students can buy them to read on their own.

According to GLSEN’s own press releases from the period during which its recommended reading list was developed, the organization’s three areas of focus were creating “educational resources, public policy agenda, [and] student organizing programs”; in other words, the reading list (chief among its “educational resources”) was of prime importance in GLSEN’s efforts to influence the American educational system.

The list is divided into three main categories: books recommended for grades K-6; books recommended for grades 7-12; and books for teachers. (The books on the list span all genres: fiction, nonfiction, memoirs, even poetry.)

Out of curiosity to see exactly what kind of books Kevin Jennings and his organization think American students should be reading in school, our team chose a handful at random from the over 100 titles on GLSEN’s grades 7-12 list, and began reading through.

What we discovered shocked us. We were flabbergasted. Rendered speechless.

We were unprepared for what we encountered. Book after book after book contained stories and anecdotes that weren’t merely X-rated and pornographic, but which featured explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air. One memoir even praised becoming a prostitute as a way to increase one’s self-esteem. Above all, the books seemed to have less to do with promoting tolerance than with an unabashed attempt to indoctrinate students into a hyper-sexualized worldview.

We knew that unless we carefully documented what we were reading, the public would have a hard time accepting it. Mere descriptions on our part could not convey the emotional gut reaction one gets when seeing what Kevin Jennings wants kids to read as school assignments. So we began scanning pages from each of the books, and then made exact transcriptions of the relevant passages on each page.

Are we exaggerating, or misconstruing quotes that could be interpreted a different way? No: Read the passages below and judge for yourself. There’s no wiggle room. The language is explicit, the intent clear.

To be specific, the books we read were:

(linked at GatewayPundit.com)

Queer 13

Being Different

The Full Spectrum

Revolutionary Voices

Reflections of a Rock Lobster

Passages of Pride

Growing Up Gay/Growing Up Lesbian

The Order of the Poison Oak

In Your Face

Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son

Love & Sex: Ten Stories of Truth

We can only vouch for what’s in these 11 books, since these are the only ones we’ve read through. Are there other books on the GLSEN reading list that are similarly outrageous? We can’t say for sure, but it seems very likely. What you see excerpted below is probably only the tip of the iceberg.

Let it be clear: This issue has nothing to do with gayness or straightness, which is irrelevant to this report. The point proven here is that the GLSEN reading list promotes the sexualization of children in general, regardless of the “orientation.”

And this is not about censorship: It’s about deciding what constitutes appropriate reading material for children. We’re perfectly OK with these books existing and being read by adults; we only start to worry when these books are assigned to children. All sorts of books are excluded from school reading lists, for all sorts of reasons. Even many books once considered classics are now considered off-limits due to language or attitudes now deemed inappropriate.

And yet, according to Kevin Jennings and GLSEN, books about a 13-year-old getting “my cock sucked and my ass fucked” or about a teenager enjoying the “exquisite bitter taste” of his friend’s semen are not just acceptable, they’re highly recommended.

As GLSEN’s own site says, “All BookLink items are reviewed by GLSEN staff for quality and appropriateness of content.” Really? (Note: GLSEN does advise adults to “review content for suitability.”)

Although GLSEN does not address how books get added to its list, it’s hard to imagine that they are chosen by low-level staffers or volunteers, with no oversight. Since the list of recommended books is one of the organization’s primary tools (”The GLSEN BookLink, an online library of recommended resources, along with the Safe Space program remain cornerstones of GLSEN’s education work.”), it’s likely that the books were chosen carefully.

Kevin Jennings stepped down as Executive Director last year after leading GLSEN since its inception, but every single book mentioned in this report was added to the list while Jennings was in charge (dates are given for each title’s addition to the list). Therefore, it’s reasonable to believe he was aware of the addition of these works – especially since most were added when GLSEN was still quite small and the Executive Director had a hands-on role in daily operations.

Below you will find dozens of excerpts taken from books on the GLSEN “Booklink” recommended reading list for grades 7-12 (i.e. for children between the ages of 12 and 17). To prove that these books are indeed recommended by GLSEN for children, click on each book’s title to see its individual listing on the GLSEN Web site. And to prove that each excerpt is transcribed exactly as it appears in each book, click on the page numbers or the small images along the left to see scans taken directly of the book pages in question. (Ellipses ["..."] indicate unrelated passages not included in some of the transcriptions; click on the full-page scans to see the complete extended quotes.) Each passage is preceded by a brief summary, given in italics.

You decide for yourself if you think these are appropriate for kids as young as 12 years old to read. And then decide if you think the man who headed the organization responsible for recommending these books to children should be in charge of school safety in this country.

Content Warning:

Keep in mind that, although the material below has been deemed by Kevin Jennings and GLSEN to be appropriate for children, some of the excerpts contain explicit language and pornographic descriptions, so if you don’t want to see such things, stop reading now.

______________________________________________


Reflections of a Rock Lobster – Page 13

(At the age of six, the author frequently performed fellatio on his fellow first-graders in the school restroom, part of a “busy homosexual childhood.”)

My sexual exploits with my neighborhood playmates continued. I lived a busy homosexual childhood, somehow managing to avoid venereal disease through all my toddler years. By first grade I was sexually active with many friends. In fact, a small group of us regularly met in the grammar school lavatory to perform fellatio on one another. A typical week’s schedule would be Aaron and Michael on Monday during lunch; Michael and Johnny on Tuesday after school; Fred and Timmy at noon Wednesday; Aaron and Timmy after school on Thursday. None of us ever got caught, but we never worried about it anyway. We all understood that what we were doing was not to be discussed freely with adults but we viewed it as a fun sort of confidential activity. None of us had any guilty feelings about it; we figured everyone did it. Why shouldn’t they?

Revolutionary Voices – Page 103

(An illustration about the change from “boy to man,” showing two Boy Scouts pointing at and looking at two adult men engaging in anal sex.)

Queer 13 – Pages 43, 44 + 45

(A 13-year-old boy has a violent sexual encounter with an older man, which causes the boy to become desperate for sex, and he ends up spending the rest of the year promiscuously getting “my cock sucked and my ass fucked” by “a seemingly endless supply of dicks” belonging to older men, concluding with “I really did enjoy those sexual encounters.”)

One day, on the bus to shop class, this ugly fuck of a man sat behind me and put his foot in the crack of my seat. He was skinny, with a patchy, pencil-thin mustache that besotted his oily face. I ignored him for most of the trip. I did notice that he changed buses when I did, but this time he sat beside me. He tried a little small talk, but then he suddenly and very nervously put his hand on my crotch. It never occurred to me to tell him not to. I’m not sure if I agreed to it or not, but he managed to get me to follow him to a nearby rest room at another secondary school “to play.” In the bathroom stall, lit by two scant rows of fluorescent lights, half of them burnt-out or flickering, he tried to kiss me, but I was too nauseated to do that. He sucked my nipples and played with my cock. I had no idea what to do. He then tried to get me to suck his. Somehow I knew this was expected of me, but I just could not put his ugly, foul-smelling penis into my mouth. When he forced it in I gagged so hard I started vomiting. Undaunted, he tried to put his cock in my ass. Thankfully, he came prematurely. He pulled up his trousers and left me in the toilet stall confused, frightened, crying, and praying to God for forgiveness of my horrible sin. I spent a good deal of time locked in the stall, trying to clean up, trying to wipe the smell of that act off with wet toilet paper, but I was doused in the stench of that man and what he had done.

This incident should have soured me on men, but it only made me more confused and needful. One day later, something accidental happened that would change my life. I discovered that at a urinal I could actually see someone else’s penis. I was ecstatic and fearful, but I wanted more. One day, at a local shopping mall, as I was trying to sneak a peek at penises in the rest rooms, a man at the urinal actually turned to me and started playing with himself. He flashed me a gold-toothed smirk and motioned for me to come over. Shocked, I zippered up and ran out, but the seeds had been laid. The whole world of rest-room sex had opened itself up to me.

Soon I was spending a great deal of time hanging out in shopping malls and cruising the rest rooms for sexual encounters. My rest-room exploits started to be a great burden on my mind. The better part of the year was spent making deals with God, asking for a sign, then ignoring and rationalizing everything I perceived to be a sign, praying for forgiveness, and being obsessed with raging hormones and a seemingly endless supply of dicks. I believed that it was all part of a test by God to see if I was a sinner. I was.

I had known before that something was up, and that I was attracted to men, but this toilet thing was a whole new realm of sin and Satan, a new level that I had never before imagined. The following years were spent praying for forgiveness and trying to purge my homosexuality through prayer and Bible study. While my classmates wondered what sex was like, content to masturbate over pinups, I was out there having my cock sucked and my ass fucked. These were grown men I was tricking with. Some were nice, grateful for a young boy to have their way with. Some were harsh and mean. There were a few nasty encounters, brutal and painful experiences, near-rapes, but through it all, I never thought that I had the ability to say no.

I was scared about what I was doing, scared of God’s judgment and of being caught in all those rest rooms and parks, but I really did enjoy those sexual encounters. That feeling of doing it to them and them doing the same for me was just too damn good.

Continued with many more references and full links at:

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.co...om-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/


Thread locked due many personal insults way above what's accepted even in this forum

Red Dawn
Anandtech Admin
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bobsmith1492

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2004
3,875
3
81
You exist to service a machine, troll.

Regardless of political leanings, someone who teaches these kinds of things should never be involved in, much less in charge of, educating ANYONE's children, much less the entire country.

EDIT: side note, are the forums broken again or did you break a 10 year hiatus in posting just to say this?
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
One
Big
Assed
Mistake
America

Kevin Jennings has no business being anywhere near children. What kind of sick fuck demonstrates fisting to kids? That fucker is a menace. Well done Obama, well done.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
notreading.gif


but, uh, seriously... I think it's a fine line between what kids need/want to know regarding sex ed and should be taught versus where it becomes inappropriate for a school setting.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
One
Big
Assed
Mistake
America

Kevin Jennings has no business being anywhere near children. What kind of sick fuck demonstrates fisting to kids? That fucker is a menace. Well done Obama, well done.

The federal government had no business being anywhere near children.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,629
6,190
126
WTF is this? Good god man, get a life. All I heard(audio quality is extremely poor) were kids asking questions and the guy answering them.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
WTF is this? Good god man, get a life. All I heard(audio quality is extremely poor) were kids asking questions and the guy answering them.

Wrong.

That was another "teacher" asking that sick fuck "what is fisting", not a student. Of course I don't expect you to be honest in your appraisal of this situation. Even if it was a student that asked the question, which it was not, the appropriate answer was not a demonstration of proper technique. Do you support "teachers" demonstrating fisting to children?

You're treading on sick fuck territory too if you see no problem with this.
 
Last edited:

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,629
6,190
126
Wrong.

That was another "teacher" asking that sick fuck "what is fisting", not a student. Of course I don't expect you to be honest in your appraisal of this situation. Even if it was a student that asked the question, which it was not, the appropriate answer was not a demonstration of proper technique. Do you support "teachers" demonstrating fisting to children?

You're treading on sick fuck territory too if you see no problem with this.

There is no problem with this. Was it another Teacher? The audio is so poor it's hard to tell. However, if the kids are asking these questions, tell them the damn Truth about it.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
There is no problem with this. Was it another Teacher? The audio is so poor it's hard to tell. However, if the kids are asking these questions, tell them the damn Truth about it.

So, if kids were asking how to poison their parents, tell them the damn Truth about it!

You are a sick fuck.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
WTF? Sex Ed, sex questions get asked. Are you an Idiot?

I can't seem to ever remember a sex ed class where "fisting" was demonstrated when I was in school. Is fisting an elective or required class in Canada?

I might be an idiot, but there is no doubt you are a sick fuck for thinking this is OK. I don't converse with sick fucks, so consider this conversation over between us.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
It was NOT a teacher who asked, it was a kid.

These "kids" are 14.

Hate to break it to you, but most "kids" these days are not-at-all-innocent-under-any-circumstances at 14.

I guarantee the kid was asking "What is Fisting?", thinking he was being a wise-ass, and knowing full well what it is, just trying to get a few chuckles from his chuckle-buddies. I'm sure he was completely surprised to recieve a serious and honest answer.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,629
6,190
126
I can't seem to ever remember a sex ed class where "fisting" was demonstrated when I was in school. Is fisting an elective or required class in Canada?

I might be an idiot, but there is no doubt you are a sick fuck for thinking this is OK. I don't converse with sick fucks, so consider this conversation over between us.

Good.

At any rate, just because we were too naive to know what Fisting was, doesn't mean that Kids these days are too. If they ask, they need to be told the Truth. Telling them the Truth has nothing to do with "Encouraging" them, that's a whole different thing.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Gardener said:
You exist to service a machine, troll.
I fully expected this thread to bring out supporters of both GLSEN and NAMBLA.

Welcome.

Yep, you've convinced me. Obama is a NAMBLA supporter. It makes obvious sense on it's face. And the White house is a cover operation for a giant pedophilia ring. I take your allegation very seriously.

Also, the fact that Gardener called you a troll CLEARLY establishes that he, too, is a NAMBLA supporter. And a pedophile, too.

You're brilliant. Everything you write makes complete sense.
 
Last edited:

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,254
136
Good.

At any rate, just because we were too naive to know what Fisting was, doesn't mean that Kids these days are too. If they ask, they need to be told the Truth. Telling them the Truth has nothing to do with "Encouraging" them, that's a whole different thing.

I've know what fisting was since I was 12, still haven't ever attempted it. Shocking, Knowledge /= deep burning desire to engage in the act ASAP.
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
So, if kids were asking how to poison their parents, tell them the damn Truth about it!

You are a sick fuck.

Beyond my personal outrage, which I kept out of the OP, I posted this story because I found that a significant number of posters here see nothing wrong with any type of sexual expression and also do not see any negative societal impact from either the indoctrination or the blatant sexual imprinting ("choice of sex roles") of kids.

There have been numerous claims that gay marriage, for example, is as wholesome as straight marriage. In recent days there have been many attempts to castigate traditional relationships while at the same time advocating what might be euphemistically called "extreme" relationships.

I believe there are serious consequences to attempts, as are well illustrated above, to rush sexual activity of all types to young children of all ages. The organized efforts of national groups like GLSEN and NAMBLA target kids at the earliest ages and start the "education" process when kids start school in kindergarten.

My wife and I did public education overseas for a while. We also chose places to live here in the US with "very good" school systems. We wanted our kids to experience life and have friends of all demographics, much as we did when we were growing up.

For a variety of reasons, including requests by our kids that they be taken out of the public school system, we put them into Catholic schools. One trigger was the aggressiveness of sexual activity that each was experiencing. Our youngest, at 10, started to refuse to go to school as he did not want to participate in this early sexual aggressiveness. We did not find out the actual cause until recently - kids are not particularly comfortable in bringing topics like this out. By removing him from the distractions his reading level jumped two full years and he is now in all advanced classes. And though we are much more aware and cautious, we no longer have as much worry.

This report shows just how tolerant the instructors are of any and all practices and just how far they are willing to go to push and encourage the practice of sex of all kinds into the classroom using any and all teaching/indoctrinating methods in the name of "tolerance."

I caution anyone reading this who has kids of any age in school to do more than blindly accept the assurances of school administrators that their classes are mainstream. The definition of "mainstream" is considerably different than what you might expect. The aggressiveness of sexual training is usually couched in terms like "prevention of child abuse," "sexual tolerance"and "gender acceptance." How that training is often actually conducted, and what is actually being taught, is presented in the OP.

I recognize and am disturbed that enough here see no problem with pushing sex of all types in the classroom and into the lives of the youngest of kids. To what purpose, only they know.

You have a choice in many things. The most important is your local school system. If you are not involved, your kids will likely be introduced as never before and at an earlier age than you can imagine into a hedonistic world of sex, drugs and violence. Take responsibility for the caring role you took on when you had kids. If you don't, there are a lot of actors that have agendas and you pass on that responsibility to them.

As far as our Czar For Safe and Drug Free Schools in the US Department of Education, Kevin Jennings - I urge you to write to the man who selected him, President Obama, to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, to your Congressman and to your Senator and demand he be removed from his appointed Federal office.

I also urge you to contact your local press and ask them to cover this story. It is that important.
 
Last edited:

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,706
6,139
136
There is no reason for NAMBLA to exist. It's a group of men that want to fuck little boys. In any reasonable society they would be put down as you do any diseased animal.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Beyond my personal outrage, which I kept out of the OP, I posted this story because I found that a significant number of posters here see nothing wrong with any type of sexual expression and also do not see any negative societal impact from either the indoctrination or the blatant sexual imprinting ("choice of sex roles") of kids.

Poor little man, it must be very difficult for you to contemplate that there are people out there getting incredible sexual pleasure engaging in other than the missionary position with the lights off. And that teenagers ask questions about these other practices - and get honest answers - OH MY GOD!!!
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Beyond my personal outrage, which I kept out of the OP, I posted this story because I found that a significant number of posters here see nothing wrong with any type of sexual expression and also do not see any negative societal impact from either the indoctrination or the blatant sexual imprinting ("choice of sex roles") of kids.

There have been numerous claims that gay marriage, for example, is as wholesome as straight marriage. In recent days there have been many attempts to castigate traditional relationships while at the same time advocating what might be euphemistically called "extreme" relationships.

I believe there are serious consequences to attempts, as are well illustrated above, to rush sexual activity of all types to young children of all ages. The organized efforts of national groups like GLSEN and NAMBLA target kids at the earliest ages and start the "education" process when kids start school in kindergarten.

My wife and I did public education overseas for a while. We also chose places to live here in the US with "very good" school systems. We wanted our kids to experience life and have friends of all demographics, much as we did when we were growing up.

For a variety of reasons, including requests by our kids that they be taken out of the public school system, we put them into Catholic schools. One trigger was the aggressiveness of sexual activity that each was experiencing. Our youngest, at 10, started to refuse to go to school as he did not want to participate in this early sexual aggressiveness. We did not find out the actual cause until recently - kids are not particularly comfortable in bringing topics like this out. By removing him from the distractions his reading level jumped two full years and he is now in all advanced classes. And though we are much more aware and cautious, we no longer have as much worry.

This report shows just how tolerant the instructors are of any and all practices and just how far they are willing to go to push and encourage the practice of sex of all kinds into the classroom using any and all teaching/indoctrinating methods in the name of "tolerance."

I caution anyone reading this who has kids of any age in school to do more than blindly accept the assurances of school administrators that their classes are mainstream. The definition of "mainstream" is considerably different than what you might expect. The aggressiveness of sexual training is usually couched in terms like "prevention of child abuse," "sexual tolerance"and "gender acceptance." How that training is actually conducted, and what is actually being taught, is presented in the OP.

I recognize and am disturbed that enough here see no problem with pushing sex of all types in the classroom and into the lives of the youngest of kids. To what purpose, only they know.

You have a choice in many things. The most important is your local school system. If you are not involved, your kids will likely be introduced as never before and at an earlier age than you can imagine into a hedonistic world of sex, drugs and violence. Take responsibility for the caring role you took on when you had kids. If you don't, there are a lot of actors that have agendas and you pass on that responsibility to them.

As far as our Czar For Safe and Drug Free Schools in the US Department of Education, Kevin Jennings - I urge you to write to the man who selected him, President Obama, to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, to your Congressman and to your Senator and demand he be removed from his appointed Federal office.

I also urge you to contact your local press and ask them to cover this story. It is that important.

subjective reasoning...thanks for your opinion.

enjoy catholic school...as a product of a catholic education myself I would never send my kids to catholic school.

Way too many perverts. :)
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
Poor little man, it must be very difficult for you to contemplate that there are people out there getting incredible sexual pleasure engaging in other than the missionary position with the lights off. And that teenagers ask questions about these other practices - and get honest answers - OH MY GOD!!!

There is a difference between an "honest answer" and demonstrating the "proper" technique for fisting someone's anus. I don't know what kind of sex education you were taught, but it should not emcompass sexual technique other than basic biology of how the plumbing works, how to protect yourself from falling victim to sexual disease, unwanted pregnancy, and sexual predators.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,169
53,642
136
There is no reason for NAMBLA to exist. It's a group of men that want to fuck little boys. In any reasonable society they would be put down as you do any diseased animal.

This thread has nothing to do with NAMBLA, it was an attempt to smear a group by association by a not-too-smart guy.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,629
6,190
126
There is a difference between an "honest answer" and demonstrating the "proper" technique for fisting someone's anus. I don't know what kind of sex education you were taught, but it should not emcompass sexual technique other than basic biology of how the plumbing works, how to protect yourself from falling victim to sexual disease, unwanted pregnancy, and sexual predators.

Really? hmmm, interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.