Obama's reelection team terrified.

[ricleo2]

"Obama’s team is terrified of the data they are getting back from the internals. Absolutely panicked. Literally panicked. There was a meeting among the president’s re-election team recently, Plough’s group, and the internal polling data was the main topic, and everybody was apparently expressing concern over the numbers. The president was not at this meeting, but was soon after briefed on it. There were no real answers given on how to improve the numbers, and that set the president off. He tore into staff. This has been happening with greater and greater frequency lately. The president kept repeating, “Why isn’t it working?” I am not certain what he was referring to with that question, but he was said to have repeated the question a number of times during the briefing. Whatever “it” might be, the indication is clear. President Obama is panicked over the now very real possibility he will be a one-term president."

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-p...ked-over-re-election-prospects/#ixzz1QDtOb1ll

 

[a777pilot]

Let's hope he just up and quits.

 

[CrackRabbit]

Let's hope he just up and quits.

Can we hope the same from you?

BTW a site where I can sign up and submit my own "news" doesn't rank highly on the credibility meter.
I'm sure that the usual cast of characters will be along shortly to sing its praises though.

 

[ichy]

*yawn*

Polls more than one year before an election mean nothing.

 

[Bowfinger]

Let's hope he just up and quits.

I think you're confusing Obama with Palin.

 

[a777pilot]

I think you're confusing Obama with Palin.

LOL!

I was waiting for that. I didn't have to wait long.

 

[a777pilot]

Can we hope the same from you?

BTW a site where I can sign up and submit my own "news" doesn't rank highly on the credibility meter.
I'm sure that the usual cast of characters will be along shortly to sing its praises though.

There are no unbiased sites on the internet. NONE!

If you know of any by all means let me know.

 

[MotF Bane]

I'll wait for a reliable news source to pick this up. And even then, I won't put any stock in it.

 

[ricleo2]

Let's hope he just up and quits.

I hope he gets impeached for treason and resigns with no pension or other government benefits.

 

[MotF Bane]

There are no unbiased sites on the internet. NONE!

If you know of any by all means let me know.

Your statement is too broad.

<insert pr0n site name here>

 

[Doppel]

"newsflavor.com"

What is that?

 

[Bowfinger]

I hope he gets impeached for treason and resigns with no pension or other government benefits.

Which is also not a news story but simply partisan wishful thinking ... just like your OP.

 

[CrackRabbit]

There are no unbiased sites on the internet. NONE!

If you know of any by all means let me know.

I didn't say biased, I said credible. There is a difference.

 

[Bowfinger]

"newsflavor.com"

What is that?

Based on limited poking around, it appears to be a wing-nut echo chamber. Sort of like Free Republic, but in "news" blog format.

 

[manimal]

In other news a quick joke.

Romney and Huntsman walk into a bar. Nobody noticed...

 

[ricleo2]

This explains the real reason Obama released the oil reserves: Desperation.

 

[ProfJohn]

With the economy in its current shape Obama is toast,

His own words will come back to kill him

"if I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-0ecuS8tWs&feature=player_embedded

 

[a777pilot]

Your statement is too broad.

<insert pr0n site name here>

Porn sites are OK. I was talking about news and/or political sites. Of that group there are no unbiased sites.

 

[her209]

"newsflavor.com"

What is that?

Its like newsmax, but with more flavor.

 

[Bowfinger]

With the economy in its current shape Obama is toast,

His own words will come back to kill him

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-0ecuS8tWs&feature=player_embedded

As I said in one of your threads where you were breathlessly proclaiming some non-issue as the nail in Obama's reelection hopes, it's all about the economy. Barring something truly spectacular like another 9/11 or a sex scandal (with video) involving livestock. Obama's 2012 chances are as good or as bad as the economy is good or bad. Historically this has almost always been the case.

What concerns me is that Republican leaders are well aware of this, and it seems like some are so craven that they might be willing to deliberately damage the economy to help the party. I sincerely hope I'm wrong, but over the last few decades, Congress' ethical standards seem to be dropping even faster than their approval ratings. Likely some connection between the two.

 

[Bowfinger]

Porn sites are OK. I was talking about news and/or political sites. Of that group there are no unbiased sites.

But there are credible sites. Newsflavor isn't one of them.

 

[lord_emperor]

1. Campaign based on change.
2. Don't change anything.
3. ???
4. Get re-elected.

 

[boomerang]

 

[Bowfinger]

1. Campaign based on change.
2. Don't change anything.
3. ???
4. Get re-elected.

Hey, can you help clarify something for me? Half of the time the Obama bashers complain that he hasn't changed anything. The other half they're screeching about how all his extreme changes are destroying America. Which is it?

 

[HamburgerBoy]

I think you're confusing Obama with Palin.

I thought she did. :hmm: