Ah hell, what was I thinking. You and HR are right. We need to just get rid of subsidized care (Obamacare) and go back to the way we were. All will be just fine in the long run. I'm sure that those that want care can easily get it...they are just living healthy young lifestyles and saving money.
All is well...carry on.
You can't even read what I posted without losing your ability to think. That's not my post, that's your failure to take a second to think about what I said.
First, the governments not understanding health care.
Properly implemented, information technologies WILL save money. It will require MORE investment that Obamacare (which I didn't mention if you paid any attention to before losing all objectivity). Even as it stands better and more timely information in hospitals will save lives and improve overall outcomes. That in itself provides reductions in disability payments, workman's compensation and therefore people become a revenue source from taxes instead of being a sink in terms of money.
TL;DR answer. Improving information technology combined with proper use WILL save money.
Hired guns-
Gruber doesn't get it. See #1
The general public.
Here's a good example.
Oh bullshit. It costs 2.5 times per capita in the US vs what the rest of the industrialized world costs for healthcare and we don't even cover all of our people vs the rest of the world that does. If they can offer to everyone at those prices, we can do it near them too. And I don't want to hear that shit about everyone here can get care. It's bullshit. The ER is NOT care. It's for emergencies, not cancer.
None of this addresses a single thing I was talking about. Nothing. It demonstrates a complete lack of understanding beyond Fox News level, a prejudice to remain uninformed and assumes that by quoting "2.5" an comprehension of what health care is to begin with. A 1950's system is replaced by the 1970's version to be implemented in the 21st century as the nee plus ultra of all possible systems. A complete rejection of the possibility to make something even better than exists now. A presentation of total ignorance of how any system works in the real world, but knows aggregate expensed comparing one system from nations culturally less complicated, physically smaller, geographically diverse, than what is generally found elsewhere. No understanding of medicine itself and how it should be practiced, but "2.5" replaces quality of care and how to go about getting what is better and less expensive here. Then we fall back on things I never even said like ERs and "everyone can get care" things I never argued for.
That's the public for you.
Edit- engineer and I are good and understand each other. I leave the post otherwise intact as there are non personal concerns which I believe are valid.