- Jul 9, 2005
- 3,721
- 0
- 0
In eye for eye terms, the Israelis killed some 4000 in Lebanon in 2005, and 1000 in Gaza in 2008. While Gaza rockets killed less than a dozen Israelis.
Eyes for an eye terms don't work.
What you're saying is not enough Jews died.
This is not how war works, moron.
The Lebanon War was in 2006, not 2005, again - moron.
Also, 4,000 were not killed.
600+ combatants (mostly Hezbollah and some Ammal terrorists - they fought the PLO in the 1980s)
~1,000+ civilians, overwhelmingly shia lebanese.
This is tragic yes, but not inconsistent with these sorts of conflicts.
Hezbollah was a terrorist organization that deliberately hides behind civilians and no-target-zones to exploit Israel's R.O.E.
I'll give you an example:
in the 1996 and 2006 conflict, the IDF declared every UN outpost a "no fire zone." This is what the US military and NATO do.
IDF did this in order to prevent casualties among UN peacekeepers, and civilians who use their outposts as shelter since they know the IDF won't target.
During both conflicts, Hezbollah members deliberately used to the "protection" of the UN security zone to shell Israel cities, knowing the IDF won't fire at them because they are too close to the UN outpost.
This has been confirmed by the UN itself. During the 2006 Lebanon War UN peacekeepers literally sent emails to the Secretary General telling him hezbollah was abusing UN rights. 4 days later, the UN outpost was hit and they all died.
The real problem is the UN soldiers do nothing. Hezbollah literally walks right behind UN peacekeepers, but as long as they don't shoot them the UN can do nothing.
During all the wars the IDF keeps an open channel with the UN to prevent such incidents. Even in the Gaza War the IDF stayed in contact with their Gaza office.
And as well know in 2000 and 2006 Hezbollah kidnapped Israeli soldiers with UN landrovers!
I'm sure if Al-qaeda kidnapped US soldiers with UN vehicles the USA would cut all funding to the organization.
The point is terrorists embed themselves among civilians intentionally to protect themselves, and jack up the casualties if an when civilians are inadvertently hit.
This is not unique to the IDF.
Exactly 1 year after the Lebanon 2, the US military engaged in a similar conflict:
Operation Phantom Thunder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Phantom_Thunder
Nearly 1,500 killed over a 2 month period.
And remember, before the US military even deployed soldiers into Afghanistan, they softed up the country with massive air raids.
Over 8,000 killed in a period of 23 days, and ~1,400 civilians - though of course we don't know the exact number of civilians and we're simply going by US military "estimate."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Crescent_Wind
So US military killed more people in 23 days than Israel had in 23 years.
And you like to talk about eye to eye?
3 soldiers were killed in Crescent Wind (friendly fire), versus 9,000 Afghanis.
How's that sound?
Israel is fighting an organization on their border, with 80,000+ rockets aimed at their city. Hezbollah is the most well-equipped and trained terrorist organization on the planet. Far more organized than the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
USA and NATO are fighting wars thousands of miles away, without a knee-jerk reactionary media designed to condemn everything it does.
It's a different reality, yet the IDF manages to live up to a higher moral standard than Obama's military.
Do you agree?
The statistics agree. The math agrees.
What military should Israel try to emulate? What country's combat policy? Russia? Saudi Arabia? India? USA?
Tell me Lemon Law. If Israel is so evil, how should it behave?