Obama Shatters Records - Announces $150 Million Haul For September!

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
UPDATE: September's haul has been announced via video at $150 million.

This is both unprecedented and utterly dominating in the modern political landscape. Obama has forever changed how fund raising will be approached by political campaigns, drawing from such a wide pool of small donors that have fed his campaign a steady stream of donations from the primary through November.

You know the saying, put your money where your mouth is? A lot of voters took that to heart this year.

The $100+ million haul in September explains how he can buy 30 minutes of air time the week before the election on all the major broadcast networks.

Now I'm curious what he'll pull in during October.

Text

By Jim Rutenberg
Saturday, October 18, 2008

PHILADELPHIA: Barack Obama is days away from breaking the $188 million advertising spending record set by President George W. Bush in his re-election campaign in 2004, having unleashed an advertising campaign of a scale and complexity unrivaled in the television era.

With advertisements day and night, on local stations and on the major broadcast networks, on niche cable networks and even on video games and his own dedicated satellite channels, Obama, the Democratic candidate, is now running at least four times as much advertising nationwide as his Republican rival, John McCain, according to CMAG, a service that monitors political advertising. That difference is even larger in several closely contested states.

The huge gap has been made possible by Obama's decision to opt out of the federal campaign finance system, which gives presidential nominees a dollar for every dollar they raise but limits to $84 million the amount they can spend between their party convention and Election Day. McCain is participating in the system.

Obama, who at one point promised to participate in it before changing his mind, is expected to announce in the next few days that he raised more than $100 million in September alone, a figure that would shatter previous monthly fund-raising records.

"This is uncharted territory," said Kenneth Goldstein, director of the Advertising Project at the University of Wisconsin. "We've certainly seen heavy advertising battles before. But we've never seen in a presidential race once side having such a lopsided advantage."

While Obama's decision to forgo the matching funds - and the limits that come with them - has given him a spending advantage throughout the election, his television dominance has become most apparent in the past few weeks as he has gone on a buying binge that has allowed him to utterly swamp McCain's campaign with concurrent lines of positive and negative messages.

The Obama campaign's advertising approach - which has included ads of up to two minutes long in which Obama positively lays out his agenda, and even ads in video games like "Guitar Hero" - has helped mask some of his rougher attacks on his rival.

"What Obama is doing is being his own good cop and bad cop," said Evan Tracey, the chief operating officer of CMAG, who calls the ad war "a blowout" in Obama's favor.

Here in Philadelphia, the biggest media market in a critical battleground state, the two candidates have run a mix of positive and negative ads.

During "Doctor Phil" on the CBS affiliate here, Obama showed a minute-long, positive commercial recounting, "One of my earliest memories: going with grandfather to see some of the astronauts, being brought back after a splashdown, sitting on his shoulders and waving a little American flag."

But, minutes earlier, during the late-afternoon news on the NBC station, Obama had banged McCain for a health care plan that an announcer alleges, "could leave you hanging by a thread."

Toward the end of the 4 p.m. newscast on the local CBS station, McCain ran a positive spot, a rarity for his campaign, which has shifted nearly 100 percent to negative ads. McCain spoke directly into the camera and told viewers, "The last eight years haven't worked very well, have they?" He promises, "I have a plan for a new direction for the economy."

An ad on the local NBC affiliate was more typical, trying to tie Obama to Tony Rezko, a Chicago real estate developer convicted of fraud. That spot was a co-sponsored by the Republican National Committee, which is allowed to split half the costs with McCain on an unlimited number of advertisements, helping him to double the number of ads he can buy.

McCain has used such advertisements to keep up with Obama's advertising in vital cities like this one, where the campaigns have combined to spend the most during the general election. But such ads come with a caveat: they must include a reference to congressional issues and leaders, making the message generally less direct. The spot with Rezko also shows pictures of two Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank.

But for every city like Philadelphia, in a state McCain views as important to his chances for victory in November, there are those like Miami, Washington and Chicago, where Obama has often been able to run advertisements nearly unopposed.

Republicans have begun a blitz of automated telephone calls attacking Obama. But by law, the Republican Party's independent advertising unit cannot coordinate with the party leadership or McCain's campaign, meaning it is not always in line with McCain's campaign message. A smattering of outside groups are running hard-charging ads against Obama, but he has the money to immediately meet those attacks with spots directly addressing their charges.

Now spending almost as much as he can in local television markets, Obama has increased his advertising on the broadcast television networks, including during National Football League games and soap operas.

"They're doing the networks because they've saturated these markets and they're looking for more time," Tracey of CMAG said.

On Oct. 12, Obama bought so heavily during NFL games and the CBS News program "60 Minutes" that, according to CMAG, he spent $6.5 million on a day when McCain spent less than $1 million.

Based on current spending, CMAG predicts that Obama's general-election advertising campaign will surpass the $188 million Bush spent on his in 2004 campaign early in the coming week. McCain has spent $91 million on advertising.
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Wow! All that cash spent, and he's still in or just above the margin of error.

Either he really sucks, or people are figuring out that he's in the Chicago, Cook County,Illinois Dem Machine,s pocket and they are resisting the move take Chicago politics and corruption nation-wide.

I'm listening to 'Ring of Fire' on Air America...those guys are sounding pretty scared ....


 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Wow! All that cash spent, and he's still in or just above the margin of error.
You do realize electoral votes win the election, right?

Feel free to provide proof he's within the MOE. I haven't seen any numbers like that since the conventions.
 

AnnonUSA

Senior member
Nov 18, 2007
468
0
0
I guess Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are not getting their usual handouts. It's all now going to Obama.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
And all he had to do to get there was break his word. Some call that a "big lie", or perhaps a "bald face liar"?
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: alchemize
And all he had to do to get there was break his word. Some call that a "big lie", or perhaps a "bald face liar"?
There were a hundred million reasons in September alone why that was a great decision.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
And all he had to do to get there was break his word. Some call that a "big lie", or perhaps a "bald face liar"?
There were a hundred million reasons in September alone why that was a great decision.
Sure, everyone has a price to sell out at! Honesty is for suckers.

 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
And all he had to do to get there was break his word. Some call that a "big lie", or perhaps a "bald face liar"?
There were a hundred million reasons in September alone why that was a great decision.
Sure, everyone has a price to sell out at! Honesty is for suckers.
:laugh: Is that the only lie of the campaign season you can think of?
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
And all he had to do to get there was break his word. Some call that a "big lie", or perhaps a "bald face liar"?
There were a hundred million reasons in September alone why that was a great decision.
Sure, everyone has a price to sell out at! Honesty is for suckers.
:laugh: Is that the only lie of the campaign season you can think of?
It certainly was the biggest one I can think of.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
And all he had to do to get there was break his word. Some call that a "big lie", or perhaps a "bald face liar"?
There were a hundred million reasons in September alone why that was a great decision.
Sure, everyone has a price to sell out at! Honesty is for suckers.
:laugh: Is that the only lie of the campaign season you can think of?
It certainly was the biggest one I can think of.
The biggest?

That's kind of sad, actually.

At least we can conclude that the voters supported his reversal; how else do you pull in $100 million in one month?
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Wow, what a man of the people. Takes the money to buy campaign ads. You know, he could take that money to feed and shelter the poor and gain free campaign support from the media. Either that thought is ahead of its time or Obama is just another politician. I'm leaning the latter.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Wow, what a man of the people. Takes the money to buy campaign ads. You know, he could take that money to feed and shelter the poor and gain free campaign support from the media. Either that thought is ahead of its time or Obama is just another politician. I'm leaning the latter.

That's not why the people gave him the money...to do as he wishes.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Wow, what a man of the people. Takes the money to buy campaign ads.
*BREAKING NEWS*

Money donated by donors to Obama's Presidential campaign is being spent on...CAMPAIGN ADS!

*BREAKING NEWS*

You know, he could take that money to feed and shelter the poor
Glad to see you support the redistribution of wealth. :thumbsup:
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Wow, what a man of the people. Takes the money to buy campaign ads. You know, he could take that money to feed and shelter the poor and gain free campaign support from the media. Either that thought is ahead of its time or Obama is just another politician. I'm leaning the latter.

I don't want the money I give him to feed and shelter the poor. This is really an idiotic statement you made, think about it for a bit and I hope you realize why.
 

DrewSG3

Senior member
Feb 7, 2005
366
48
91
It would've been worse off for McCain if he would've foregone public financing as well.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,703
54,695
136
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Wow! All that cash spent, and he's still in or just above the margin of error.

Either he really sucks, or people are figuring out that he's in the Chicago, Cook County,Illinois Dem Machine,s pocket and they are resisting the move take Chicago politics and corruption nation-wide.

I'm listening to 'Ring of Fire' on Air America...those guys are sounding pretty scared ....

You realize that we will likely never see a 10+ point win in a presidential elections ever again in our lifetime, right? So really, just about every winning candidate will end up being 'just above' the margin of error. All this money is being spent for about 5% of the voters, and it looks like Obama's getting the majority of those.

As for Democrats sounding scared, they are so used to losing elections that if Obama was up by 20 points and then dropped down to 15 they would be scared. Obama has led the polls for nearly the entire campaign, and he's lead by a fairly steady constant margin. His recent spike due to McCain's incompetent campaigning and the financial crisis was bound to be temporary. He will likely soon return to the ~5 point advantage, and remain there until the election, which is will most likely win.
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
Well, I guess that it's a sad fact that the one who spends the most money typically has a huge advantage. I guess that we should just hand the election to the person who can raise the most amount of money.

Heck, I hate Obama but I have a feeling that he is going to win for one reason. He is pulling in and spending A LOT more than McCain. It's not because he's better. It's not because his policies are better. It's not because he's smarter or more dignified or any other quality that you may look for in a president. It's simply because he's outspending his competition 2-1.

WELCOME TO AMERICA!
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: XZeroII
WELCOME TO AMERICA!
Why does McCain suck so hard at fund raising, among other things?
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Wow, what a man of the people. Takes the money to buy campaign ads. You know, he could take that money to feed and shelter the poor and gain free campaign support from the media. Either that thought is ahead of its time or Obama is just another politician. I'm leaning the latter.

You can't govern if you don't win. It's unfortunate, but we don't live in the land of unicorns and puppy dogs. If Obama is altruistic and gives his money to the local soup kitchen to help the poor, you can bet McCain would jump at the chance to NOT do the same and win the election, and then where would the poor people be?

You don't like it? Then try to change the system...but don't blame the candidates for having to play by the rules.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Well, I guess that it's a sad fact that the one who spends the most money typically has a huge advantage. I guess that we should just hand the election to the person who can raise the most amount of money.
Heck, I hate Obama but I have a feeling that he is going to win for one reason. He is pulling in and spending A LOT more than McCain. It's not because he's better. It's not because his policies are better. It's not because he's smarter or more dignified or any other quality that you may look for in a president. It's simply because he's outspending his competition 2-1.
WELCOME TO AMERICA!
I guess that's why Senator Obama is running against the extremely well-heeled Republican campaign machine of Mitt Romney...