Obama Ready To Ctrl+Z Bush's White House Policies

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
He's hitting the ground running. His supporters will find it very comforting that unlike Bush, who set new records for vacation days taken by a President, Obama has a sense of urgency about him.

He realizes the American people elected him and strong Democratic Congressional majorities to make swift, decisive actions that will put us on the road to recovery. And undoing the ass-backward executive orders and policies Bush implemented is one of the first orders of business.

I'm very pleased to see that science will once again reign supreme when Obama reverses Bush's ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.

Text

By Ceci Connolly and R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 9, 2008; A16

Transition advisers to President-elect Barack Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders that could be swiftly undone to reverse White House policies on climate change, stem cell research, reproductive rights and other issues, according to congressional Democrats, campaign aides and experts working with the transition team.

A team of four dozen advisers, working for months in virtual solitude, set out to identify regulatory and policy changes Obama could implement soon after his inauguration. The team is now consulting with liberal advocacy groups, Capitol Hill staffers and potential agency chiefs to prioritize those they regard as the most onerous or ideologically offensive, said a top transition official who was not permitted to speak on the record about the inner workings of the transition.

In some instances, Obama would be quickly delivering on promises he made during his two-year campaign, while in others he would be embracing Clinton-era policies upended by President Bush during his eight years in office.

"The kind of regulations they are looking at" are those imposed by Bush for "overtly political" reasons, in pursuit of what Democrats say was a partisan Republican agenda, said Dan Mendelson, a former associate administrator for health in the Clinton administration's Office of Management and Budget. The list of executive orders targeted by Obama's team could well get longer in the coming days, as Bush's appointees are rushing to enact a number of last-minute policies in an effort to extend his legacy.

A spokeswoman said yesterday that no plans for regulatory changes had been finalized. "Before he makes any decisions on potential executive or legislative actions, he will be conferring with congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle, as well as interested groups," Obama transition spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said. "Any decisions would need to be discussed with his Cabinet nominees, none of whom have been selected yet."

Still, the preelection transition team, comprising mainly lawyers, has positioned the incoming president to move fast on high-priority items without waiting for Congress.

Obama himself has signaled, for example, that he intends to reverse Bush's controversial limit on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, a decision that scientists say has restrained research into some of the most promising avenues for defeating a wide array of diseases such as Parkinson's.

Bush's August 2001 decision pleased religious conservatives who have moral objections to the use of cells from days-old human embryos, which are destroyed in the process.

But Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) said that during Obama's final swing through her state in October, she reminded him that because the restrictions were never included in legislation, Obama "can simply reverse them by executive order." Obama, she said, "was very receptive to that." Opponents of the restrictions have already drafted an executive order he could sign.

The new president is also expected to lift a so-called global gag rule barring international family planning groups that receive U.S. aid from counseling women about the availability of abortion, even in countries where the procedure is legal, said Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he rescinded the Reagan-era regulation, known as the Mexico City Policy, but Bush reimposed it.

"We have been communicating with his transition staff" almost daily, Richards said. "We expect to see a real change."

While Obama said at a news conference last week that his top priority would be to stimulate the economy and create jobs, his advisers say that focus will not delay key shifts in social and regulatory policies, including some -- such as the embrace of new environmental safeguards -- that Obama has said will have long-term, beneficial impacts on the economy.

The president-elect has said, for example, that he intends to quickly reverse the Bush administration's decision last December to deny California the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles. "Effectively tackling global warming demands bold and innovative solutions, and given the failure of this administration to act, California should be allowed to pioneer," Obama said last January.

California had sought permission from the Environmental Protection Agency to require that greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles be cut by 30 percent between 2009 and 2016, effectively mandating that cars achieve a fuel economy standard of at least 36 miles per gallon within eight years. Seventeen other states had promised to adopt California's rules, representing in total 45 percent of the nation's automobile market. Environmentalists cheered the California initiative because it would stoke innovation that would potentially benefit the entire country.

"An early move by the Obama administration to sign the California waiver would signal the seriousness of intent to reduce the nation's dependence on foreign oil and build a future for the domestic auto market," said Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Before the election, Obama told others that he favors declaring that carbon dioxide emissions are endangering human welfare, following an EPA task force recommendation last December that Bush and his aides shunned in order to protect the utility and auto industries.

Robert Sussman, who was the EPA's deputy administrator during the Clinton administration and is now overseeing EPA transition planning for Obama, wrote a paper last spring strongly recommending such a finding. Others in the campaign have depicted it as an issue on which Obama is keen to show that politics must not interfere with scientific advice.

Some related reforms embraced by Obama's transition advisers would alter procedures for decision-making on climate issues. A book titled "Change for America," being published next week by the Center for American Progress, an influential liberal think tank, will recommend, for example, that Obama rapidly create a National Energy Council to coordinate all policymaking related to global climate change.

The center's influence with Obama is substantial: It was created by former Clinton White House official John D. Podesta, a co-chairman of the transition effort, and much of its staff has been swept into planning for Obama's first 100 days in office.

The National Energy Council would be a counterpart to the White House National Economic Council that Clinton created in a 1993 executive order.

"It would make sure all the oars are rowing in the right direction" and ensure that climate change policy "gets lots of attention inside the White House," said Daniel J. Weiss, a former Sierra Club official and senior fellow with the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

The center's new book will also urge Obama to sign an executive order requiring that greenhouse gas emissions be considered whenever the federal government examines the environmental impact of its actions under the existing National Environmental Policy Act. Several key members of Obama's transition team have already embraced the idea.

Other early Obama initiatives may address the need for improved food and drug regulation and chart a new course for immigration enforcement, some Obama advisers say. But they add that only a portion of his early efforts will be aimed at undoing Bush initiatives.

Despite enormous pent-up Democratic frustration, Obama and his team realize they must strike a balance between undoing Bush actions and setting their own course, said Winnie Stachelberg, the center's senior vice president for external affairs.

"It took eight years to get into this mess, and it will take a long time to get out of it," she said. "The next administration needs to look ahead. This transition team and the incoming administration gets that in a big way."
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
What is fascinating is that Obama's team has been hard at work planning on running the country from day one.
And McCain barely had a transition team meeting. Even when he was ahead in the polls.
 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
there are some liberal policies that W had that i like..... everything else, not so much...
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: techs
What is fascinating is that Obama's team has been hard at work planning on running the country from day one.
And McCain barely had a transition team meeting. Even when he was ahead in the polls.
Apparently Bill Clinton was on day 5 when he named his cabinet. I don't know where Bush was. Obama certainly seems to be at work, I guess putting all the ducks in a row. Perhaps his first few hours will be spent simply signing the documents he now will have the authority to sign.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
That's called separation of power. The American people elected a Democrat to the White House so he could enact his agenda.

Republicans can voice their opposition in Congress with something called a "vote".
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!

I completly disagree. Obama has made it clear he intends to include free lube in his health care plan.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
That's called separation of power. The American people elected a Democrat to the White House so he could enact his agenda.

Republicans can voice their opposition in Congress with something called a "vote".

Dumb. You can voice your opposition to the President in congress as well. It's called a "debate". Any other words of wisdom from Mr Propaganda?
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
That's called separation of power. The American people elected a Democrat to the White House so he could enact his agenda.

Republicans can voice their opposition in Congress with something called a "vote".

Dumb. You can voice your opposition to the President in congress as well. It's called a "debate". Any other words of wisdom from Mr Propaganda?

Your signature is supposed to come at the end of your statement, not at the beginning.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: techs
What is fascinating is that Obama's team has been hard at work planning on running the country from day one.
And McCain barely had a transition team meeting. Even when he was ahead in the polls.
Apparently Bill Clinton was on day 5 when he named his cabinet. I don't know where Bush was. Obama certainly seems to be at work, I guess putting all the ducks in a row. Perhaps his first few hours will be spent simply signing the documents he now will have the authority to sign.

Bush had less time to prepare since Gore was trying to steal the election.

In any case, pwnage not found, unless you believe that Bush did the same pwnage to Clinton.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Obama made a point of saying he was going to take as long as needed in choosing his cabinet, so that he gets it right.
After all he could just pick the head of the Arabian Horse Association to be Director of FEMA, but I think we know how the Bush selection process worked out.
Sounds like a plan.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
That's called separation of power. The American people elected a Democrat to the White House so he could enact his agenda.

Republicans can voice their opposition in Congress with something called a "vote".

Dumb. You can voice your opposition to the President in congress as well. It's called a "debate". Any other words of wisdom from Mr Propaganda?

Your signature is supposed to come at the end of your statement, not at the beginning.

Gosh, aren't you a clever one? Funny to see the liberal P&N'ers circle the wagons with one condescending statement after another.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Dumb. You can voice your opposition to the President in congress as well. It's called a "debate". Any other words of wisdom from Mr Propaganda?

Your signature is supposed to come at the end of your statement, not at the beginning.
:laugh: :thumbsup:
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
That's called separation of power. The American people elected a Democrat to the White House so he could enact his agenda.

Republicans can voice their opposition in Congress with something called a "vote".

Dumb. You can voice your opposition to the President in congress as well. It's called a "debate". Any other words of wisdom from Mr Propaganda?

Your signature is supposed to come at the end of your statement, not at the beginning.

Gosh, aren't you a clever one? Funny to see the liberal P&N'ers circle the wagons with one condescending statement after another.

This is the second thread I've seen it in. Just trying to help you out there, buddy.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Guess what will happen when Republicans voice their opposition? The Dems will probably flood the media with reports of the right being "devisive!"

If only the Republicans will go along with getting raped without lube, in the name of unity!
That's called separation of power. The American people elected a Democrat to the White House so he could enact his agenda.

Republicans can voice their opposition in Congress with something called a "vote".

Dumb. You can voice your opposition to the President in congress as well. It's called a "debate". Any other words of wisdom from Mr Propaganda?

Your signature is supposed to come at the end of your statement, not at the beginning.

Gosh, aren't you a clever one? Funny to see the liberal P&N'ers circle the wagons with one condescending statement after another.

This is the second thread I've seen it in. Just trying to help you out there, buddy.

Lame.
 

microbial

Senior member
Oct 10, 2008
350
0
0
Overdue we fix what's broken in this country. Time to roll-up our sleeves and get to work.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: microbial
Overdue we fix what's broken in this country. Time to roll-up our sleeves and get to work.

I hear Michael Brown is ready, willing and able to resume his position as Director of FEMA.
Not to mention Rumsfeld at the DOD.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,363
1,222
126
Originally posted by: techs
What is fascinating is that Obama's team has been hard at work planning on running the country from day one.
And McCain barely had a transition team meeting. Even when he was ahead in the polls.

That's what happens when one guy had to work to get to where he is at and the other relied on the good 'ol boy network.
 

microbial

Senior member
Oct 10, 2008
350
0
0
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: microbial
Overdue we fix what's broken in this country. Time to roll-up our sleeves and get to work.

I hear Michael Brown is ready, willing and able to resume his position as Director of FEMA.
Not to mention Rumsfeld at the DOD.

I saif Fix not fuc..k.

Come to think of it, those two can help this country and redeem themselves. The first puppy is going to need full-time shit scoopers.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: techs
What is fascinating is that Obama's team has been hard at work planning on running the country from day one.
And McCain barely had a transition team meeting. Even when he was ahead in the polls.
Apparently Bill Clinton was on day 5 when he named his cabinet. I don't know where Bush was. Obama certainly seems to be at work, I guess putting all the ducks in a row. Perhaps his first few hours will be spent simply signing the documents he now will have the authority to sign.

Bush had less time to prepare since Gore was trying to steal the election.

In any case, pwnage not found, unless you believe that Bush did the same pwnage to Clinton.
I imagine he probably did, and that is also pwnage!

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,588
6,713
126
We've gone from an absolute dolt to a stupendous statesman. I think Bush deserves some credit for that.
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Interesting...

My belief, right or wrong, is that the majority voted for change because of the bad economy first and foremost...

The people who I know that are a part of what many would consider Obama's base constituency are very socially conservative but feel that the republicans favor the wealthy with regards to money...

it will be interesting to see how in four years reversing these policies effects Obama's public appeal, especially if he isn't able to do anything to either shift perception away from himself should the economy still suck, or take alot of undue credit should things get better....

For reference I say look at what just happened in california...if anything that is a slap in the face followed by double barrel middle fingers to the liberal agenda given that state is one of their powerhouses.