Obama Picture from MSNBC

GrGr

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2003
3,204
1
76
They love to do that.

Like the pic of Putin as Time Person of the Year. A very cold, steely pale blue light giving him a sinister mien in this mug like shot (down right in the link).

link

"The Russian President's pale blue eyes are so cool, so devoid of emotion that the stare must have begun as an affect, the gesture of someone who understood that power might be achieved by the suppression of ordinary needs, like blinking. The affect is now seamless, which makes talking to the Russian President not just exhausting but often chilling. It's a gaze that says, I'm in charge."

:roll: at Time magazine.





 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
As the right wing moonbats have run out of ways to attack Hillary and Obama on political positions so they cherry pick a few photos to make them look evil.

I am underwhelmed at the quality of the logic. After all, Ted Bundy was such a fine looking man.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
well the obama squad tend to laugh at pics of hilary as well.. so fairs fair
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
everyone's got bad angles.

when you're being photographed 24/7, the cameras are bound to catch them.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,925
2,907
136
Originally posted by: Lemon law
As the right wing moonbats have run out of ways to attack Hillary and Obama on political positions so they cherry pick a few photos to make them look evil.

I am underwhelmed at the quality of the logic. After all, Ted Bundy was such a fine looking man.

Yea, because MSNBC is known for their right wing bias......:roll:
 

laketrout

Senior member
Mar 1, 2005
672
0
0
All kidding aside - its still surprising that MSNBC would actually use that photo as its visual representation of the candidate. I knew CNN was already in the bag for Hillary - didn't MSNBC was too.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: laketrout
All kidding aside - its still surprising that MSNBC would actually use that photo as its visual representation of the candidate. I knew CNN was already in the bag for Hillary - didn't MSNBC was too.

Chris Matthews has an orgasm every time he talks about Obama, and had to apologize after saying Clinton wouldn't even be a candidate without Bill having been president. Most of the other pundits seem to feel the same way. They run one picture you don't like and suddently an entire network is in Hillary's pocket? You conspiracy nuts are entertaining.