Obama is a snake and we have to turn on him

[BoberFett]

Obama is a warmongering, economy wrecking douchnozzle? Really?
He ended the idiotic Iraq war, and the economy is doing a lot better now than when he took office. I might not like everything he is doing, but he is doing a hell of a lot better than Bush. Anyone who thinks they are the same is either lying or insane.

And there it is, more half-hearted whimpering about Obama, when you'd be howling in protest if a Republican did the same thing.

So just because he hasn't invaded another country (yet, he's still got a couple years) but is instead using drones to blow up innocent brown people halfway around the world, he's not a warmonger?

You and the rest of the Democrats are just a bunch of jizz-gurgling sychophants.

 

[Incorruptible]

Obama is a warmongering, economy wrecking douchnozzle? Really?
He ended the idiotic Iraq war, and the economy is doing a lot better now than when he took office. I might not like everything he is doing, but he is doing a hell of a lot better than Bush. Anyone who thinks they are the same is either lying or insane.

You're doing a real good job at lying. obama wanted troops to stay longer in Iraq and it was under a bush negotiation that troops would leave.

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/05/barack-obama-did-not-end-the-war-in-iraq

bush started the drone war and obama has expanded the drone war and used more drone strikes than bush. He has killed many innocent people in these countries who now hate us and created more terrorists.

The source is a militant left wing site.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...resident_ordered_more_than_george_w_bush.html

As for the economy once again you're wrong. obama supported the bailouts which did a lot more harm than good and will only encourage more of the same. He has killed and prevented jobs with the EPA attacking the oil pipeline and coal plants. And many of the jobs created were part time.

Anyone who believes that BS about obama is either lying or insane.

 

[frowertr]

You're doing a real good job at lying. obama wanted troops to stay longer in Iraq and it was under a bush negotiation that troops would leave.

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/05/barack-obama-did-not-end-the-war-in-iraq

bush started the drone war and obama has expanded the drone war and used more drone strikes than bush. He has killed many innocent people in these countries who now hate us and created more terrorists.

The source is a militant left wing site.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...resident_ordered_more_than_george_w_bush.html

As for the economy once again you're wrong. obama supported the bailouts which did a lot more harm than good and will only encourage more of the same. He has killed and prevented jobs with the EPA attacking the oil pipeline and coal plants. And many of the jobs created were part time.

Anyone who believes that BS about obama is either lying or insane.

Yeah, after all, Obama has only been in office for 5 years now. There is no way any of this could be his fault...



When does anything actually become his fault to you lefties?

 

[ivwshane]

You're doing a real good job at lying. obama wanted troops to stay longer in Iraq and it was under a bush negotiation that troops would leave.

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/05/barack-obama-did-not-end-the-war-in-iraq

bush started the drone war and obama has expanded the drone war and used more drone strikes than bush. He has killed many innocent people in these countries who now hate us and created more terrorists.

The source is a militant left wing site.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...resident_ordered_more_than_george_w_bush.html

As for the economy once again you're wrong. obama supported the bailouts which did a lot more harm than good and will only encourage more of the same. He has killed and prevented jobs with the EPA attacking the oil pipeline and coal plants. And many of the jobs created were part time.

Anyone who believes that BS about obama is either lying or insane.

Finally you admit your insanity. It must have taken a lot of courage to write what you did and then immediately call it BS.

 

[Incorruptible]

Finally you admit your insanity. It must have taken a lot of courage to write what you did and then immediately call it BS.

I was referring to the post I was responding to. Typical ignorant leftist who completely ignores the post because it's critical of that pos obama.

 

[bshole]

So just because he hasn't invaded another country (yet, he's still got a couple years) but is instead using drones to blow up innocent brown people halfway around the world, he's not a warmonger?

As long as Americans aren't dying, I have a hard time getting too upset about it.

I will take Obama's foreign policy over Bush's insanity EVERY day of the week.

 

[BoberFett]

As long as Americans aren't dying, I have a hard time getting too upset about it.

I will take Obama's foreign policy over Bush's insanity EVERY day of the week.

Typical Democrat scumbag.

 

[IGBT]

Your obama is not the wizard of smart. If it wasn't for the fact that the liberal media have mesmerized reverence and groundless adoration his regime would have ended years ago. Without the curtain and firewall of low information voters your obama would be seen for what he actually is. Political / economic and social blight.

 

[Incorruptible]

As long as Americans aren't dying, I have a hard time getting too upset about it.

I will take Obama's foreign policy over Bush's insanity EVERY day of the week.

Good job supporting the murder of innocent people. obama has continued and expanded the policies of bush with drones.

 

[bshole]

Aw give it a break. Seriously. Drones are not specifically targetting innocent people. They hit a terrorist kingpin and everybody near that target is collateral damage. That is one hell of a lot better than mustering a half million American soldiers, toppling governments, igniting civil wars, Americans maimed and dead, and causing 100s of thousands of civillian casulties. For Republicans to be crying crocodile tears over 10s of civillians casulties in the face of the wholesale slaughter that occurred under Bush is WAY BEYOND laughable.

Republicans are beyong redemption in international affairs. Bringing the neo-con chicken hawks up on criminal charges would be a first step towards forgiveness. The incessant war-mongering is WAY past its expiration date.

By the way, it is nice to see Incorruptible standing up for Islamic terrorists. How are we to deal with terrorist kingpins if we can't DRONE them?

PS. Obama gets an A+++ on foreign policy in my book. He has done a fantastic job in that arena. If a Republican was in power, we would have thousands more dead Americans lost in the quagmire of IRAN that they want so desparately to get into.

 

[BoberFett]

Aw give it a break. Seriously. Drones are not specifically targetting innocent people. They hit a terrorist kingpin and everybody near that target is collateral damage. That is one hell of a lot better than mustering a half million American soldiers, toppling governments, igniting civil wars, Americans maimed and dead, and causing 100s of thousands of civillian casulties. For Republicans to be crying crocodile tears over 10s of civillians casulties in the face of the wholesale slaughter that occurred under Bush is WAY BEYOND laughable.

Republicans are beyong redemption in international affairs. Bringing the neo-con chicken hawks up on criminal charges would be a first step towards forgiveness. The incessant war-mongering is WAY past its expiration date.

By the way, it is nice to see Incorruptible standing up for Islamic terrorists. How are we to deal with terrorist kingpins if we can't DRONE them?

PS. Obama gets an A+++ on foreign policy in my book. He has done a fantastic job in that arena. If a Republican was in power, we would have thousands more dead Americans lost in the quagmire of IRAN that they want so desparately to get into.

Civilians you don't care about. Amirite?

While you're up there, tell us about Obama's colon health.

 

[thraashman]

Aw give it a break. Seriously. Drones are not specifically targetting innocent people. They hit a terrorist kingpin and everybody near that target is collateral damage. That is one hell of a lot better than mustering a half million American soldiers, toppling governments, igniting civil wars, Americans maimed and dead, and causing 100s of thousands of civillian casulties. For Republicans to be crying crocodile tears over 10s of civillians casulties in the face of the wholesale slaughter that occurred under Bush is WAY BEYOND laughable.

Republicans are beyong redemption in international affairs. Bringing the neo-con chicken hawks up on criminal charges would be a first step towards forgiveness. The incessant war-mongering is WAY past its expiration date.

By the way, it is nice to see Incorruptible standing up for Islamic terrorists. How are we to deal with terrorist kingpins if we can't DRONE them?

PS. Obama gets an A+++ on foreign policy in my book. He has done a fantastic job in that arena. If a Republican was in power, we would have thousands more dead Americans lost in the quagmire of IRAN that they want so desparately to get into.

Civilians you don't care about. Amirite?

While you're up there, tell us about Obama's colon health.

The use of drones in the war on terror is an improvement over the way it was run under Bush. That one is kinda hard to deny. That doesn't make collateral damage ok and it doesn't make the classifying of any military age male as an enemy combatant ok. There needs to be an improvement over how we conduct the war on terror that is not just ending it and reduces the number of civilian casualties as much as possible. It is unfortunate that the host governments of these countries are unable to police themselves to stop terrorists. And unfortunately in war there is always collateral damage.

 

[jackstar7]

Snake? What? No.

Snake-Oil Salesman? Yes.

 

[Jaskalas]

Well OP, I agree with Oliver Stone. I didn't see that coming.

 

[Incorruptible]

Aw give it a break. Seriously. Drones are not specifically targetting innocent people. They hit a terrorist kingpin and everybody near that target is collateral damage. That is one hell of a lot better than mustering a half million American soldiers, toppling governments, igniting civil wars, Americans maimed and dead, and causing 100s of thousands of civillian casulties. For Republicans to be crying crocodile tears over 10s of civillians casulties in the face of the wholesale slaughter that occurred under Bush is WAY BEYOND laughable.

Republicans are beyong redemption in international affairs. Bringing the neo-con chicken hawks up on criminal charges would be a first step towards forgiveness. The incessant war-mongering is WAY past its expiration date.

By the way, it is nice to see Incorruptible standing up for Islamic terrorists. How are we to deal with terrorist kingpins if we can't DRONE them?

PS. Obama gets an A+++ on foreign policy in my book. He has done a fantastic job in that arena. If a Republican was in power, we would have thousands more dead Americans lost in the quagmire of IRAN that they want so desparately to get into.

I am standing up for the innocent children that are killed in these strikes. You have lost any credibility that you had.

 

[bshole]

You have lost any credibility that you had.

Yea I am always losing stuff. I guess that's just another thing that I've lost. Ah well, maybe I can order some more on Amazon. With overnight shipping I should have my credibility back tomorrow.

 

[BoberFett]

The use of drones in the war on terror is an improvement over the way it was run under Bush. That one is kinda hard to deny. That doesn't make collateral damage ok and it doesn't make the classifying of any military age male as an enemy combatant ok. There needs to be an improvement over how we conduct the war on terror that is not just ending it and reduces the number of civilian casualties as much as possible. It is unfortunate that the host governments of these countries are unable to police themselves to stop terrorists. And unfortunately in war there is always collateral damage.

Just so we're clear, Democrats are OK with war as long as Americans aren't dying?

"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it." — Robert E. Lee

 

[bshole]

Just so we're clear, Democrats are OK with war as long as Americans aren't dying?

"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it." — Robert E. Lee

I dont know about Democrats but for myself, if America goes to war I vastly prefer that we leave the dying to our opponents.

I am a little disappointed that you apparently prefer to have Americans dying in our engagements.

 

[Linux23]

End the Fed. End lobbying. End life long terms for lawmakers. And then get back to me whether it makes a difference if any one man or woman is going to do anything but the status quo.

Until then, lets get ready to elect the next talking puppet for the elite and prepared to have our civil liberties abolished even further.

You guys really need to watch the documentary on Chavez called South of the Border, directed by Stone.

 

[thraashman]

Just so we're clear, Democrats are OK with war as long as Americans aren't dying?

"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it." — Robert E. Lee

There you go with your lack of reading comprehension again you little scamp. Too bad I said nothing remotely like that.

 

[Incorruptible]

Yea I am always losing stuff. I guess that's just another thing that I've lost. Ah well, maybe I can order some more on Amazon. With overnight shipping I should have my credibility back tomorrow.

Good to see you make light of the killings of innocent people and admit that I destroyed you.

 

[Darkman]

WND EXCLUSIVE

Big Brother cops crush push to impeach

Reports of police threatening, intimidating Americans at overpass rallies

Gina Loudon
Published: 3 days ago

Thousands of Americans have participated in numerous Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment rallies across the nation over the past few weeks – and now there’s word of several arrests and police intimidation of citizens who peacefully protest on public walkways.

WND reported, when the movement first launched, that Americans were staging protests on freeway overpasses and calling for Obama’s impeachment .

Now, police have responded to some protest sites after reports of profanity and items being thrown from overpasses. Protester and organizer Lisa Zimmerman said none of the claims have been substantiated, and there is a concerted effort to shut down the protests. In two separate incidents, three overpass protesters have been arrested.

It’s finally here! “Impeachable Offenses” is the first draft of the articles of impeachment!

At a rally west of St. Louis, Mark Messmer and Duane Weed were arrested. The incident was caught on a YouTube video that’s racking up about 50,000 views per day.

As seen in the video, the protesters, while standing on a public sidewalk, asked repeatedly what law they were breaking and why they were being asked to leave.

One officer can be heard saying, “I’ve been polite and asked you to leave the overpass.”

Another officer can then be heard saying, “Can you come with me? Do you recognize I am a peace officer? I’ve asked you and told you that you needed to leave.”

One protester asked, “Are we breaking a law here? What law am I breaking?”

An officer spoke up: “Failure to comply with the highway patrol. I’ve given you two chances. Third time, I’m going to arrest you.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/big-brother-cops-crush-push-to-impeach

 

[justoh]

Hard to justify or defend the expanded usage of drone strikes and to excuse collateral damage when it's probably doing more harm than good - galvanizing anti us sentiment and likely producing more terrorists than they're removing.

The worst thing about him is that unlike bush or the people he ran against in 2008 and 2012 (or most republicans, generally speaking, especially those running for office), he appears to be quite intelligent and educated, making his actions that much more difficult to understand or accept.