MagickMan
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2008
- 7,537
- 3
- 76
Dream On.
You link Newsmax? Might as well link the Enquirer.
Oh, and it's nice of you to finally admit the obvious, that Repubs are obstructionist, even if you mis-attribute their efforts and the scope of them. You merely parrot the excuses they've employed all along. They've been obstructionist in all matters, right down to the confirmation of rather minor functionaries & routine matters.
If the People won't let them run the Govt, they'll be damned if they'll let Dems do it. It's scorched earth policy, an exercise in bitterness & spite.
You're incapable of even looking at anything from a non-partisan perspective, that's amazing... pathetic, but amazing. :awe:
I'm going to tell you that your scenario has about a 0% chance of happening. Taking any and all bets that it will though. I offer very favorable odds!
Explanations why a SCOTUS, especially one stacked in favor of conservatives, wouldn't find Obama's egregious use of executive orders unconstitutional?
*Note, I didn't say "excessive", but although there have been former presidents who have issued more, none have pushed their scope to this extreme.